I have noticed that some have the opinion of you winning the person over their past lovers. others say that they have finished playing around and want someone to settle with who hasn't played the field. how do you feel and what number for each gender would you say puts them in category of experienced. what about someone who sleeps around vs someone who is a serial dater.
personally I would prefer someone who is nearer to my personal dating history meaning: inexperienced. this is just preference and when you meet someone it might go out the window. but I was wondering what your opinions are.
Most Helpful Guy
I settled down after quite a number of women. I think maybe around 40 to 50, I lost exact count, and only a fraction of those really stood out (some were even girls I only dated for weeks). Not sure if that qualifies me as "experienced" or not.
But I didn't settle down because I wanted to settle down. I just ended up falling deeply in love when I met the one who would be with my wife.
I actually wanted to find love but cycled through women thinking it was impossible. I only "liked" them.
As for me, I never cared about sexual history. If I like a woman, I like a woman. Doesn't matter if she's a virgin or has had a hundred partners. I was never insecure about the number of lovers. Virgins or close actually make me a little more uncomfortable than ones who have had a healthy (but not ridiculously excessive) number of partners since I'm sometimes worried that I'm going to end up corrupting them. Often with virgins I feel like I'm not the right guy to take that away from her since I have such a hard time falling in love.0
- Show AllShow Less
Most Helpful Girl
I personally wouldn't feel comfortable as you know, if you have asked, what they may have done in the past. I am linking this boy who has done a lot more than me because I am kinda inexperienced with boys.
If I knew what the guy has done then it is a turn off for me as he has maybe done it with many girls which I find disturbing1