I'm serious. I actually pointed this out on someone else's question and so now I'm asking the male community with female input. A lot of guys, especially on here, claim that they don't just want sex from a woman and most women are wrong to think that, yet, for some reason, sex is almost always a deal breaker. And I've seen guys on here on various questions and Takes say this. Guys claim they want a good woman and it seems that even if they find one, if she's not going to have sex with you and wants to wait a while, then you leave. Like, she'll make you dinner, rub your shoulders, spend time with you, be great all around, but if you don't have sex, you leave. Well, most men will, not all.
So... if you aren't wanting a woman just for sex, why is that almost always a deal breaker?
Most Helpful Guy
deal breaker in what way?
I don't just date a girl for her looks but that doesn't mean that looks don't matter at all. And it's the same with sex. I'm willing to wait until she feels ready but I'm not the type of guy who likes to wait until marriage and we need to be sexually compatible.
So no, I definitely don't want just sex from a girl but it's an important thing in a long term relationship, so it's not like it doesn't matter at all and I don't give a fuck if I'll ever have it and once it happens, what we do.1
- Show AllShow Less
Most Helpful Girl
Wow, these blue answers you're getting are confusing. They say they want more than sex but aren't willing to wait until she's ready for sex, but feel like she doesn't love them if she doesn't put out soon (because love = physical relations I guess). Therefore having no sex is the deal breaker that drives them away because the relationship doesn't feel like a real relationship.
So in other words, introducing sex into the relationship has to be acted on male terms or there is no relationship at all. Interesting.0