I can only assume it's because both are popular series and that negates the need to analyze them further in order to draw comparisons. It's like comparing Star Wars to the Hunger Games - pointless. Two entirely different concepts that don't merit a comparison.
Really they do? I have no idea, I don't know but could because I think the Twilight actor had acted in one of the Harry Potter movies, I think it's the "Harry Potter and Goblet of Fire", so they might be comparing their performances or something? However doesn't makes sense to me also.
Harry potter movies have nothing to do with twilight movies.
Lol, I don't know. They are two completely different things. I think people just like to be stupid when it comes to that stuff. If you don't like Twilight, then don't like it. You don't have to bash it so much, though. If you don't like Harry Potter, it's not big deal. I don't see why people compare them. I never did and I love Twilight, but I never got into Harry Potter. I don't hate it though.
I never got that. The Harry Potter books has this thing called character development that is nonexistent in twilight. This was how twilight should've ended. Sam can take muscles, Dean can take sparkly. starecat.com/.../...tion-twilight-supernatural.jpg
Exactly Harry Potter has a purpose . To protect his friends and himself from Voldemort. In twilight the purpose was who is going to save Bellas ass. Harry potter is and will remain a movie with a lot of meanings and good story with great actors. Twilight has nothing to compare to Harry Potter only stupid fangirls say that. Sorry if i offend someone of the Twilight fangirls :P