That depends on the quality of the tattoo. My sister has amazing tattoo designs on her. She designs them herself. They are both minimalistic, black/white but still sufficiently detailed. I'll have to snatch her latest "fox" designs and scan them.
But some of them are just really trashy and bad-looking.
I really hate tattoos, I have dated a couple of women with a few tattoos, they were nice women and I enjoyed being with them. But I just could not get past those big ass tattoos over their bust, neck, arms, legs, belly and back.
One visible tattoo is okay, especially if it is located on an arm or leg. I wouldn't want to date someone with a lot of tattoos. One time I dated someone with a tattoo on her lower back. Fucking her from behind, the tattoo was a distraction. She had a nice ass and I would have been more turned on by it if I didn't feel like I was in the fucking art gallery.
It would be nice to see a girl without them for once honestly. Maybe stand out and be one who doesn't have them. haha. Honestly one or two tats is ok for me, but some girls are all tatted up and that's kind of trashy in my opinion.
If/when I want to see artwork, I can go to a museum or simply look around. Tattoos make a woman (or guy) look cheap, sorry to say. It screams "no" to me. Why does someone have to do that? Their natural beauty is what matters, not paintings on them. It shows a lack of respect to their body, as well as other less desirable qualities. I run from women with them. I prefer clean ones. Just saying,