a girl answered a question about another girl becoming a hooter's girl. she said that her and her teacher classify people in two groups...eye candy and brain candy. and that if the girl works at hooters she will be eye candy. my question really is what if your both? I average a 4.0 and yet I've been told I'm very attractive and am often hit on. can you really only be eye candy or brain candy or can you be both?
You can definitely be both, there are so many variations of people that sometimes it is hard to believe, but having said that to not have a person who can't be both eye candy and brain candy would be weird considering how many people there are in this world.
In some ways I'd like to agree. I know some beautiful girls that were brain candy. Now, having good grades in school, I would not catagorize as brain candy. For example, I know some pretty intellectual people but I would not care to have any intellectual discussions with them. However, there are some girls who fun and intellectually very interesting. But I don't think I'd want her more in the physical sense (sometimes I do). I think you are appealing to differant parts of the brain and in people they like it isolated. Its kind of like saying people read Playboy for the articles. People that are into more diverse pleasures read the articles and oogle the women.
Obviously, one can be both; the eye-candy/brain candy distinction is complete crap.
Any mature person knows not to judge a book by its cover. Why would it not apply to Hooters girls? Probably some noxious little blend of prudery and snobbery, but certainly no rational thought, nor respectable sentiment.
Yes, I think you can be both. Separating girls in only two different categories like that seems a little black and white.You don't have to be strictly one or the other. I know plenty of girls who have both beauty and brains. ^-^
you answered your own question. you average a 4.0 and are considered to be very attractive. you know as well as everyone that answered this post, that the girl and her teachers theory is a pile of sh*t