It's really stupid. By your thinking, love shouldn't exist other than as a defined term for an umbrella of biological processes, which you should know? So why cement yourself with legalese and added responsibilities? I don't get it.
Most Helpful Girl
The lamest argument against atheism is bringing love life of a person into the argument and wanting to connect believing in God with being able to love.
The only difference between a God believer and an atheist is that an atheist is after a logical believable explanation even for his or her love, and that explanation doesn't make him stop having or enjoying that feeling. and that's apart from the fact that knowing about the actual reasons of the creation of a feeling inside can help him or her deal with the issues associated with that feeling better.
but that believer believes in something he/she can't even explain and like always he is lost in a feeling and the most he/she can do is to pray for something that again S/he can't explain to help him and "brighten" the way for him.
We know for example that the hormone oxytocin has direct effect on a mother's love for her child or a person's affection. and aside from oxytocin injection for mothers for some medical reason it's being suggested as something that can improve behaviours in people that naturally lack oxytocin like some people in some disorders. Literally science improving love.
Is that something odd and is that love unreal and impure because it was improved in a purely materialistic way? no, love is love. you can't explain what causes it, an atheist can actually explain. That is all.
It doesn't matter what makes us love each other the ability to love is what matters, and above that valuing the feeling of love.
and an atheist is able to even improve that feeling while you can't do anything about it with your belief.1