Any ideas and suggestions?
Do you think 29-33 years old is a good age for reproduction of a woman? Especially for the first children?
What Girls Said 6
Mentally, emotionally, and spiritually? Yes.
Physically? It has it's risks according to doctors :/
Typically, by that age, your average woman has evolved and corrected her pre-woman tendencies. So she's more likely to be a more emotionally stable, wise, skilled mother. Not only that, but hopefully by then she's developed the qualifications to have a nice amount of money in the bank for savings and financial needs.0
That is probably when you are the most ready to have children. I know people who had children younger then that and they found it almost intolerable.0
33 might be on the higher side if you plan for more than one baby, but what do I know?0
The gyno will determine that.0
What Guys Said 4
There's not really a "good age for reproduction" I say , there's a reproduction viable age , and an age where it starts to become risky but a "good" one.
Define what does a "good age" to you entails.
What makes an age "good" ?0
Well... biologically it is a good age. I think that mid to late thirties is a better age to have children. You have more money, your career is more stable, and you have more time.0
Generally speaking, after 16 the earlier the better. Realistically 20-25 is the "best age" for women to reproduce, however 29-34 is not bad. My mom was 33 and I turned out okay.0
Yeah, but the younger the better (within reason) because of higher fertility and less chance of abnormalities with the offspring.0
Select as Most Helpful Opinion?
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.