Why didn't they kill Osama Bin Laden's sons and daughters?

What if they become terrorists too?


0|0
5|7

Most Helpful Guy

  • So are you saying that we should automatically punish everyone for crimes their parents committed?

    2|0
    0|0
    • They didn't have a problem with killing his son and shooting his wife in the ankle

    • They did that because he was in a terrorist base and was going to shoot

What Guys Said 6

  • Killing the children for the wrongdoings of their parents.
    Nice morality.

    1|1
    0|0
  • Anyone could technically become a terrorist. We can't go kill them because of the possibility they might be terrorist. What happens if they turn out normal and don't go into terrorism then you have killed an innocent person.

    1|0
    0|0
  • Because what good person kills someone for the sins of their parents?

    Killing people for crimes they haven't committed is wrong no two ways about it.

    1|0
    0|0
  • Good question... in the US, bleeding heart liberals claim that children who are abused will grow up to be abusers. It's the same for terrorists. Hopefully now we will get it right with ISIS.

    1|0
    0|0
  • To keep the title of hide-and-seek champion out on the line

    1|0
    0|0
  • Probably a tactical thing.

    1|0
    0|0

What Girls Said 5

  • Then they'll be dealt with accordingly. You can't just go around killing people because they might do something terrible. That's not justice - that's vigilantism.

    1|1
    0|0
  • Troll better not harder

    1|0
    0|0
  • What if? Every child had the chance of becoming a terrorist. We could kill all children under your logic. They'll kill his children IF they follow in his footsteps. If your father was a murderer does that mean you'll become one as well? No.

    1|0
    0|0
  • You don't kill people just because their parents did something bad.

    1|0
    0|0
  • This question makes no sense.

    1|0
    0|0
Loading...