As a side note i think the cavs are a better team if they had everyone and if you flip the situation around and take away 2 of the 3 best players on the warriors and the cavs have everyone, then i think the cavs would have won in 4 maybe 5 games and to me thats why lebron is better he can post up and be a big or he can take the ball up the cort and command the offense like a point gaurd and he can put a crippled team on his back and beat the nba champs on their home court (Gmae 2) nobody else can do that.
- Cavs win50% (10)
- It would have been close likely a game 725% (5)
- warriors still win25% (5)
Most Helpful Guy
It's impossible to say how it would have gone down.
First, you gotta remember that Blatt's offense essentially turned Love into a spot up shooter. Irving might have made a bigger difference, but at the same time the Cavs got some pretty inspired performances from Mathew Dellavedova--you gotta take that into account too.
I'd say that the Warriors would have still won, probably in six.0
- Show AllShow Less