In a Lowe's home improvement store near Charlotte a Copperhead snake hiding in a tree in the nursery of the garden department bit a man. The man was later taken to the hospital. Do you believe the store should be held responsible or not?
I believe it was nothing more than a freak accident.
- Yes, Lowe's should be held liable44%(7)39%(13)Vote35%(6)
- No, it was just a freak accident56%(9)61%(20)Vote65%(11)
Most Helpful Girl
That was a freak accident. Lowe's shouldn't be liable for snakes being in trees, that's just something some snakes do. And it's not like they inspect every tree before opening. Now, if they were supposed to and they didn't, yes, they should be held responsible. But really, no.3