Most Helpful Girl
it really depends, reasons may vary from case to case.
if person A and person B started off their relationship just as friends, it's pretty normal for the rejector to feel upset if the other party suggested they were really after something more (sexual), and they even refuse to stay friends when the reply to the romantic/sexual advance id 'no, thanks'. it's a bit like being betrayed, when you just wanted a friend while the other person *pretended* to be friends to just get in your pants.
if person A and person B start interacting from scratch, and the first approach is a date-proposal, then yeah it makes perfect sense to refuse to 'be friends' with someone who doesn't want us as lovers - because what we want from each other is not the same thing, and final goals collide.
also, not all romantic/sexual relationships can turn into friendships, after they end, for the same exact reason. if someone who brutally dumped me (and who was NOT my friend before we started dating) proceeded to ask me to 'stay friends', well fuck off. that's power hunger and manipulation indeed.
Most Helpful Guy
. Copy paste coming but my answer was about FRIENDZONING... but the sames rules apply it's about POWER, CONTROL and oh yeah and a EGO BOOST for the rejector/friendzoner
"What be messing me up is when Those girls decide to say something similar to "why don't/can't we be "FRIENDS" OR "Why don't you talk to me anymore" -_-
Like umm why in the world would I be friends with someone I found to be attractive? Seems that Friendzoner JUST WANTS to be DICK/have power over the friendzonee more times than not to pad their own ego sometimes LOL.
So why not just simply quit being FRIENDS with them in the 1st place? is what I always say. So either she gone be MINE or NOTHING at all in my mind LOL " i1127.photobucket.com/.../...f.com-add-text_15.gif