Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
G@G Community 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
How Do I Look? 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel & Leisure 
Trending & News 
Updates:
- Intelligence is not atomic. It has types.
Some people are emotionally intelligent, they can feel your emotions easily and support you the way you need.
Some people are socially intelligent. They know how to maintain a high number of friendships and contacts without compromises.
Some people are highly talented artists.
Some are intellectuals, some are highly intelligent in business, some in science, some in politics.
You cannot limit a person to a single type of intelligence and judge them based on that. That would be unfair.
As for me, emotional intelligence matters the most.0|00|0Is this still revelant? 
Anonymous11 dIf she has a favourite Kardashian, there won’t be a second date0|00|0Is this still revelant?
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!What Girls & Guys Said
128- That's one of my biggest turn-offs, actually. So no; never. I actually WAS with a girl like this as well in 2015 (had a banging body, but learned she was a feminist and closed-minded), and had to dump her because I can't be with someone who I can't respect.0|00|0
- Are you saying like someone with Tourettes where they will start cursing you out on accident, or someone who doesn't know my language well or just someone who can talk at all, like they physically can't speak, because if it was any of those then yes I would be chill dating them, but if it was someone who wasn't intelligent enough to speak, I don't know if I could do it, probably not.0|00|0
- Probably not overly important to me depending what you classify as "intelligent conversation". I'm not a big talker in general, and a lot of topics people talk about bore me lol, so I probably won't care so much. Example I'll never sit and talk politics with someone, ever!0|00|0
- Anonymous12 dDefine intelligent conversation.
I have seen people talk about which colors to match in which lighting, and it was still very intelligent. I guess when we let people talk about things they are passionate about, we can see the light in their eyes.0|00|0 - I mean I don't need to delving deap into the works of Nietzsche or Marcus Aurelius or discussing the the evolutionary history of arthropods.
Some of the most fun conversations I've had have been just nerding out over fandoms or arguing over the proper way to construct a cheeseburger.
It could just be that I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "intelligent conversation" though.0|00|0 - yes, intelligence is an acquired ability and not inherent and I can guarantee you that if anyone in contact with me is not able to become intellectually sound or at least sound like one , then I lose but I never lose and I love challenges.
I will in fact transform the girl such that she will start feeling like a PhD researcher.0|00|0 - Anonymous11 dI don't know what you mean. There are numerous subjects and points of discussion. You can delve into many individual subjects and tie it all back together to a point. I can't fathom anyone one who could not maintain such stimulating conversation, Squirrel!0|00|0
- Most likely not. I do know people who have a limited background and limited life experience due to circumstances beyond their control. But if they can still hold a somewhat intelligent conversation than that is good.0|00|0
- They need to be able to hold a decent conversation. Intelligence helps but I've got enough of that for us both.0|00|0
- No, i have my moments of when i am super serious. I sometimes need my times of no funny business and more lets get work done. Happens in everything i do so now i couldn't do that0|00|0
- depends, as long as she isn't brain dead stupid its fine0|00|0
- Well what do you consider an intelligent conversation? Talking about politics, science? Or just a mature conversation about things you both enjoy.0|00|0
- Anonymous12 dProbably not, honestly. That's fine for a fling, but not long-term.0|00|0
- Well if its fun and random that can be just as good so yes0|00|0
- No, I need someone who can hold an intelligent conversation (deep conversation).0|00|0
- Sure! I love conversation. Doesn't matter if it's intelligent or not.0|00|0
- I'm more concerned with what I can put in her mouth then listening to what comes out of it. So yes.0|00|0
- Only if sex/money was the only interest.0|00|0
- Nope.
I need intellectual stimulation.0|00|0 - Definitely not. It would be too boring.0|00|0
- What do they talk about if it's not intelligent ?0|00|0
- I can. But once, only :)0|00|0
- nope. 1 of my criteria is intelligence0|00|0
- no... many women can't hold those conversations.0|00|0
- I once tried to, she just wanted sex.0|00|0
- Been there, done that... it really sucks.0|00|0
- Anonymous11 dThey are for sex only... not conversing with...0|00|0
- Hell no!!0|00|0
@JessieBellll not necessarily. If you are boring because you can not hold an intelligent conversation than what's the point of dating them.
- Show All Show Less
@JessieBellll sure i can. You want to talk about the theory of relativity or how the first mass extinction of the ordorvician era changed the world? We can talk about string theory or even the evolution of the universe and how the God particle started it all.
@JessieBellll
Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.
ENGLAND AND WALES
The age of consent to any form of sexual activity is 16 for both men and women. The age of consent is the same regardless of the gender or sexual orientation of a person and whether the sexual activity is between people of the same or different gender.
It is an offence for anyone to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 16. However, Home Office guidance [1] is clear that there is no intention to prosecute teenagers under the age of 16 where both mutually agree and where they are of a similar age.
It is an offence for a person aged 18 or over to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 18 if the older person holds a position of trust (for example a teacher or social worker) as such sexual activity is an abuse of the position of trust.
SCOTLAND
The age of consent to any form of sexual activity is 16 for both men and women, so that any sexual activity between an adult and someone under 16 is a criminal offence. The age of consent is the same regardless of gender or sexual orientation.
There are possible defences if the sexual activity does not involve penetrative or oral sex. These are if the older person believed the young person to be aged 16 or over and they have not previously been charged with a similar offence, or the age difference is less than two years.
Sexual intercourse (vaginal, anal) and oral sex between young people aged 13–15 are also offences, even if both partners consent. A possible defence could be that one of the partners believed the other to be aged 16 or over.Do you think a 40 year old man or woman having sex with a underage person is a sexual predator?
Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent children who are in early adolescence, typically ages 11–14 and showing Tanner stages 2 to 3 of physical development.[1] It differs from pedophilia (the primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children), and from ephebophilia (the primary sexual interest in later adolescents, typically ages 15–19).
Ok the facts are on the table. What do you want to complain again. You can not have people follow your way when you are wrong. About some 30+ woman and a male teen "under 17".
@JessieBellll
Sexual predator is defines as a person who has committed a sexually violent offense and especially one who is likely to commit more sexual offenses.
To answer your question, no. I said no before i will continue to say it. This is up to the law of the land in the UK. They were not found to be one. Plus such conclusions can only be confirmed by a psychological analyst which i am sure the court or law enforcement has determined.I was talking about underage, so whatever is illegal.
I was never talking about law of the UK. I don't know what you mean when you said I am "wrong".I argued with a guy who claimed just because the law says you are a sexual predator, it doesn't make you one.
I think it depends on the situation for example if it's a pedophile with a child, they are a sexual predator but if it's a man peeing in public, he doesn't deserve to be called that.What do you mean one offense?
If an adult has sex with a 13 year old once, you don't think they are a sexual predator?But the legal definition counts, which calls them a sexual predator, no?
Majority of people would call them a sexual predator@JessieBellll
I don't follow the herd. I make my own decision based on facts. If they are not a sexual predator based on psychological science they are not.Do you think the guy who said I am wrong because the law is not the reality but science is?
I think he was self righteous@JessieBellll
Well yeah it sounds like it. Lol
As for the law they generally follow science. But they also make their own conclusions because they have to be definite. Science is never definite. As a scientist you are trained to realize that nothing certain. Do i agree with how they used the word in the law? No. Do i agree with what this guy said? No. Do i agree that you are wrong about what they law says? No. Again only a medical professional can make that determination of a person's mental well being. Only medical professional can decide what is best for the adult who caused the act. Should the law protect the young person and keep the adult away from them? Yes. The adult was not at right mind for doing what they did.The guy also said I am wrong for thinking she is using him as the boy would use the situation for himself.
I told him it makes me really angry she is using him and he got mad at me and was rude.
He says he doesn't care about underage sex, but I think he doesn't mind female pedophiles and has a bias.
I felt he was just self righteous and thinks he knows it all.
Related myTakes
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
Yes No
Most Helpful Guys