While reading answers on some question asked by a girl regarding beautiful girls, some guy's answer caught my attention. He said "beautiful (attractive) girls are known to be shallow, spoiled, hard to get, play games, and guys chicken out to talk to them." This isn't word for word. Is this stereotype true? I mean to categorize attractive females as being shallow, hard to get, they play games because they can get any guy they want, and spoiled? Sure, the chicken out part is somewhat true because we all get nervous around people we find attractive, but what about the rest?
Most Helpful Girl
Eh. Not really.
I think guys who chase really attractive girls without being attractive think this because they hang on the world of the game players. The girls who don't play games politely turn them down, whereas the game players pretend to give them a chance. There are more "normal" girls than game players, but the hot normal girls don't even pretend to give these guys a shot. Hence, it seems like all hot girls are game players. In reality, it's only hot girls that these guys can get attention from are game players. Same goes with girls and hot slutty guys ... of course a hotty slutty guy is going to be involved with more females, by nature of being slutty. That doesn't mean that all hot guys are sluts or that all male sluts are hot guys, for that matter. A lot of them aren't... But the overlap comes when girls chase a slutty guy BECAUSE he's hot and then thinks he's slutty because he's hot, when, in reality he's hot AND he's slutty, but the reason she has access to him is because he's slutty and the hot mongamous guys are usually in relationships.0