Have An Opinion?
I hate how many people said no. When love exists, it exists. Just reverse the situation here and imagine if you were told everyday that being straight is wrong. Just think about it.
Yes I support itLove is love
That is a very gay thing to say for a man who is probably straight
So you’re saying that everyone who says that love is love is gay?
... how? Love is love. I mean, if tautologies are gay then you might want to reconsider your outlook.
I support two people getting married because they love each other deeply. So yes, I do support gay marriage. Love is love.
Yeah of course.
Why is it that the people who tell us that marriage is an outdated institution and should be abolished are the same people who defend homosexuals' right to get married?
I don't know, but I learned a long time ago, that if you really want to piss off an attention whore, just agree with them.
@MarciOwens Good lesson to learn!
Are the trans community trying to abolish marriage? That sounds like the far left.Far left =/= transcommunity
Sorry guys - meant to say gay community.
I'm not religious or anything, but I still don't believe it is right and should even be a thing really. But at the end of the day, I believe in freedom and equality and I want people to be happy. If it makes them happy, then so be it. I certainly wouldn't treat someone differently because they are gay, or in a same sex marriage. I just wouldn't approve of it, deep down. But I would keep that to myself as I wouldn't want to upset or offend them. It's certainly not my place to lecture them on the basis of my own beliefs or views, therefore I also wouldn't expect them to try and force it down my throat and lecture me from their standpoint. It's like... they're gay. They're married. Get over it. There shouldn't even be a need to reference it, or make a deal out of it, from either side. Whether you agree with it, or not. And that goes for the gay couple as well. I don't necessarily agree with it, but I accept that people feel that way. And they better respect the fact that some people don't agree with what they do, providing people aren't being nasty. Again, I believe in freedom of choice.
I don't have a problem with people doing what they want in their bedroom. But I don't need to know about it, am not really interested in it, and prefer they just keep it to themselves. I don't have to 'like it' - but that's what THEY want from everybody else - they want you to know their depravity, and like it.I also really don't get the complete shunning of anything religious by the lgbt community, yet they want a biblical union, to marry in holy matrimony. It's SOOOO hypocritical. They should have the right to a union, and the legal benefits, but a biblical 'marriage'? I've never understood that.
I understand that you're allowed to have your own opinion, but what is it that makes people against it? Im all for it and glad my country has it legal here. Though if you're not the one marrying the same sex, why should that matter to you? Think of it this way, if timmy down the street doesn't like spinach and you absolutely love it, would you care? Probably not. So why do you care if he wants to marry a man? Its his life. Stay out of it
My real problem with the issue was based off semantics and a fear of reverse discrimination, which has been proven valid.Where I live, same sex couples could already recieve all the same legal benefits as a married couple, it was just called civil union instead of marriage. I didn't see a reason to change this since it provided no positive change other than legally recognizing a different label. Second I also saw that if the law was amended to guarantee them the right to marriage, any refusals would be discrimination. This has since caused issues where religious people who dont support homosexuality have refused to take part in the wedding, been sued, and lost everything. Basically causing religious discrimination to prevent sexual discrimination where these 2 things conflict.I may not care if timmy likes spinach or not, but if refusing to cook spinach for timmy results in me losing my house, I'm going to care a lot.
@dropkicknj13 It was never about these people's rights it was only about liberals trying to piss us off and them getting off on us being pissed because they got their way this is what it all comes down to.
I don't support it or reject it. I'm not neutral on gay marriage either. Lol. My belief on gay marriage and basically a lot of things is this - if you aren't murdering anyone, stealing from anyone or harming anyone... who cares? I'm not against gay people getting married. It is what it is.
Get your own word, do the same thing as marriage but with two same sex, idgaf, but don't take a word that meant something else and morph it to your new definition. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Make a new fking word if you wanna be gay together forever NOBODY HAS A PROBLEM WITH THAT LITERALLY NOBODY so enough with this horseshit, go be gay NOBODY CARES just fuck off with this social justice stuff. I live on the west coast so it's just a massive echo chamber of everyone pretending gays have it so bad when really they are the most venerated group of people in this region of the world. Stop playing this stupid game everyone, please, just stop it. The entire premise of this question is fundamentally flawed, from it's root assumption, that people who don't support gay's changing the definition of an old word actually have a problem with living and let live, which almost everyone naturally gravitates towards if left to their own devices.
I think you are wrong in every way you could be on this issue. Do you remember xmen two? Nightcrawler: ... why not stay in disguise all the time? You know, look like everyone else. Mystique: Because we shouldn't have to.If you were creating a world and a society, and you wouldn't know your place within it, would you not prefer to make things as equal as possible?
U missed my point completely dude read it again and this time instead of thinking bout what u wanna say actually try and understand what im saying
*Get your own word because outs means one thing *If that is not your point then please point out my mistake.
*ours, not out
What does getting their own word have to do with fking x men and having to hide? I never said they have to pretend not to be gay lol I just said not to change the definition of a word
*broadly) any of the diverse forms of interpersonal union established in various parts of the world to form a familial bond that is recognized legally, religiously, or socially, granting the participating partners mutual conjugal rights and responsibilities and including, for example, opposite-sex marriage, same-sex marriage, plural marriage, and arranged marriage:Anthropologists say that some type of marriage has been found in every known human society since ancient times.*That's from dictionary. com.
Gtfo with dictionary. com u can look up liberalism and it will be mutilated as well, marriage is between a man and a woman that is how the word was defined when it was concieved and it doesn't matter what a dictionary says, you can't change history
I brought up xmen because the two characters want to feel normal and looking like regular people would do that for them. Two men wanting to get married would make them feel legitimate in the eyes of society.
Words change anyway. Gay once meant happy. Queer was just strange and sinister leathery handed.We change words all the time by using slang. In a very real way it doesn't matter what a word meant a hundred, a thousand years ago because how we use it now is what matters.
Dictionaries are only descriptive, not prescriptive. They describe how the words are used
Gay is another word that shud have kept its original meaning, the homosexual community in general is absolutely awful when it comes to words and respecting their definitions. Marriage is between a man and a woman jf two men live together and love eachother thats fine but i refuse to call it marriage because it is not
Dude, words change all the time and its organic. You can't stop slang. You also can't change the fact that cultures change and the language they use reflects that.
By the normative use of the word, two men can indeed be married.
If u know greek and latin roots and respect language u would not speak as you do. If u want a new meaning make a new word, this butchering old words shit didn't start until a couple hundred years ago
Oh my god, really?You know how our language came about right? French, Italian and Spanish are all direct descendents of Latin - they were created because the speakers borrowed words from other languages, abbreviated existing words, portmanteaued two words together and buckets and buckets of slang got thrown around. This is how ALL languages evolve, be it Babylonian, Greek, Latin, Egyptian, English, German or any other. Hell, the Chinese language is one of the fastest evolving because of how their writing works - combining different kanji to make new words.I'm sorry that I understand that and you don't. I'm genuinely surprised anyone would try and use this "I respect language" bollocks as a defense of your position. Its ludicrous and betrays your lack of understanding about how we talk and how we think about words.
I agree with you 100%. Equality is one thing, and attention whores is another thing.
Saying that proves u dont have an intimate understanding of latin based languages and im done arguing. English words respect the definitions of the latin and greek roots from which they were born
I don't have an intimate Knowledge of Latin based languages? Me with my gcses in Latin, Spanish and French, my Spanish wife, my Italian grandmother and by polyglot father in law.You've actually got to be kidding me. Our language isn't based of Latin. Its influenced by Latin, french (which is only Latin by way of a long ass game of Chinese whispers) Dutch, German, Norse and Celtic. Do you think people just got together one day and made a language and all agreed to start speaking it?Oh, here's something funny - where did the concept of marriage come from? Did it just get to ancient Roman times and suddenly they thought, oh this might be nice. Bollocks. We've had marriage in all cultures, for damn near all time and its meant slightly different things to each one.You're an idiot.
@MarciOwensI dislike attention whores as well. Does that mean we should remove the institution of marriage from them?
all couples should have the same rights but to that end i did support the straight couple that wanted just a civil partnership here in the uk too... dont think it was ever allowed but did serve to expose a double standard. while civil partnerships were still available to gay couples
I don’t. At all. It’s absurd lol. A lot of gay people don’t support gay marriage either because they are sensible people and know that it’s not actually marriage.
I don't care😒I respect people choices🙏(it's their life so i can't force them to marry with opposite gender) if they're happy with their choices then i don't care😒
It should be legal at the federal level but states can decide on their own.However the government claims to be secular but clearly laws banning same sex marriage are religiously motivated so pick one gubmint.
I find it ridiculous to kidnap the idea of 'traditional' marriage, which assumes a man and a woman as partners.Why don't the homo's come up with an own homo-version of a (permanent) bond between two lovers?
Laughing my arse off. I couldn't agree more!
The whole concept of marriage is stupid as fuck if you ask me. "will you be my property untill I die?" I dunno man, shit seems pointless. But if you ask me I couldn't care less if they made marriages for animals legal as well.
It's a legal contract that comes with some government benefits. No reason same-sex couples shouldn't be allowed to enjoy those same benefits.
What does support same sex marriage mean!!Do I support as in condone or approve of it, no I most certainly do not.Do I support liberty to live you life as you wish and have it legal to marry a same sex partner, yes I do.Do I support smoking, no I do not condone or approve of it, do I want to ban it, no each has to make his/her personal choice in life even when some choices are bad or unhealthy.
Who am I to judge what other adults do? Let any adult marry any adult. I still have no clue why so many of the men on here think they deserve to have a say in what other people do with their lives.
Well not just men on here, obviously, but men in general, who for some reason are far less accepting than women. It's shameful...
I believe everyone has the right to pursue their own happiness so long as they're not hurting anyone and this is pretty damn harmless unless one let's it when it really isn't.
I don’t see why so many people have an issue with it. When it comes down to it, it has no effect on you so what’s the big deal?Let people who they wanna be as long as they aren’t hurting anyone/anything in my opinion
Yeah exactly, it doesn't effect anyone except the people that are getting married and happy about it. I never realised people were so split on it! Thought it would be like 90% yes 10% no
I'm not for or against it. I'm for freedom and that includes same sex marriage, you do what you want with your life it's none of my business :D
I am very indifferent about it. You want to marry each other go for it more power to you.You can mary a street sign for all I care as long as you are happy and it's legal go for it.
Yes. It became legalized in my country back in 2015, even though it was only until 1993 that homosexuality was illegal 🚫🇮🇪
@StephenCF i didn't know you support gays&gay marriages😔
@celin98 Well what made you assume the opposite? 🤔
@StephenCF you said they should live in silence (for example gay shouldn't kiss each other in the streets) and you said you're not a gay fanatic
@StephenCF hey please check my messages
@celin98 I never said that, or if I did talk about no kissing on the street, I’d have talked about ALL couples (I’d never use double standards on gays) 🤔 I’m not a gay fanatic, but what’s that got to do with THEIR civil rights?
@StephenCF no, you didn't talk about gay kissing but i remember you said they should do the things what couples do in their homes (at private) that's why i gave a example about kissing. anyway i really don't care.
Wow... I'm just surprised so many people said no! I thought it was standard to support it these days.
It's matter of personal choice. I have nothing to say.
i don't care about it. i don't have to support it. people can jump from a cliff if they want to. doesn't mean i should support it
This issue is like a decade old. Yes, I support gay marriage. I don't know many gay people but I figure they deserve the same rights as I have. Not much more to say about it really.
This issue is older than you or I. It's annoying to see it keep coming up but it's also annoying that some people won't just sit back and let other people have equal rights.
No I don't support it but I don't bash it either. I'm neutral about it, I don't care.
Totally depends marrying by law is completely fine but by church is not possible
If GOD doesn't support homosexuality , then why should I? No... I dont , I never did , and to your amazement, never ever will.
You're also not supposed to judge.
@DeanJ98. That's a reminder of scripture, not the passing of judgement as you just did. Besides , judgement doesn't end with a question mark.
I don't support it but also don't really care too much either way
I do support gay marriage; love is love (as long as if it’s consensual)
by the way I love that actress from Orange is the New Black
Nope, never have, never will. Who would ever support them except for: sjw-s, femi-nazis and neo-liberals?
@sheepdip Because it's not natural, people can't procreate in such relationships.
@sheepdip No, they are not, infertile people can at least try to cure themselves in fertility clinics. People who have medical needs also can seek medical help. People who don't want kids can have them if they want to, but it's their choice not to have them, however, they are still in natural relationship which allows them to have kids if they eventually change their mind someday.
@sheepdip Fertility clinics are scientific institutions, they can help some of the infertile people, besides, science always advances, and as an atheist, I firmly support science.Currently available medications can't help someone with an extremely narrow pelvis or weak heart, but surgery can. What about not being able to produce kids is immoral?Gay relationships have been observed in nature, did you know that? Plenty in fact.
Yes, I know that some animals have it too, well newsflash for you, animals are not immune to genetic disorders, just like humans.
@sheepdip It's not a "pretence", science was developed by humans, evolution of the human brain allowed us to discover new and useful things, including cures for various disorders. You're wrong, they can help infertile people by intrauterine insemination, or by in vitro fertilization (in the lab). Sure, maybe they currently can't help men who are unable to produce sperm, but science makes progress every day. Nope, disorder is never ok, for example:People who have Color blindness, Muscular atrophy, Hemophilia, Diabetes, Albinism etc - all of them want to be cured, the main difference between them and lgbt people is - they are reasonable, and they are not trying to impose their disorder as something "normal". I'm fine with my reasons because they are scientific, however, there are other atheists who also have valid reasons for not supporting lgbt marriages: http://tech.mit.edu/V124/N5/kolasinski.5c.html
@sheepdip Well, that's why I said, science is making progress every day, they can't cure albinism, colour blindness and hemophilia - Yet.. but someday, they will find the cure. That's not a very good comparison, because different species of fish have evolved to live in either sea water or fresh water... or even both. When I say natural, I mean naturally functional behaviour, which has some purpose. For example, in sexual reproduction of species with two separate biological genders, it's natural to reproduce by male & female intercourse (regardless of which biological gender carries out the pregnancy). You can't sexually reproduce by two speciments of the same gender, so, the conclusion is - it's a deviation, a disorder, whatever you want to call it. Note that I said two different biological genders - that excludes hermaphrodites, androgynous or intersex species, because they have both biological genders in one speciment, they reproduce by inseminating each other, and some of them can even self-fertilise.I also excluded asexual species which reproduce by fragmentation, fission, budding, sporogenesis and parthenogenesis.
@sheepdip A right to what? To impose their disorder as something "normal"? My reasoning is valid, they are the ones who are unreasonable, I've never seen anyone in that group of people who want to cure themselves... which clearly separates them from people with e. g diabetes, hemophilia, astigmatism etc. Do kids with special needs try to impose themselves on society as something "normal"? Nope, they are not, that's why they go to special schools. Disabled people have certain privileges because they are invalids, they need physical help... you can't compare them to lgbt people.
Polygamy is not illegal in some countries, e. g Saudi Arabia. On the other hand, being gay is illegal in certain countries.Marriage (according to law) is defined as the formal union of a man and a woman, of course, having children is not the only reason why people should get married (if they want). There are several other reasons (legal, social, emotional, financial, spiritual or religious, and sexual reason). However, mr Kolasinski already explained in the article why same-sex marriages should not be supported.
@sheepdip This is a secular argument for banning lgbt marriage, it's actually paraphrased from the law of the ex USSR... as you know, Soviet government was secular and atheist. In fact, no socialist country ever supported such deviations of marriage. Lgbt marriages are a product of western quasi-leftists, pseudo-socialists, and neo-liberals (I don't support any of them).
@sheepdip It's not a disease, I never said that, but it's a disorder - It has no biological purpose, it's a deviation, or some kind of error in DNA, don't worry, science will be able to detect the malfunctioning genes, and repair them.No it's not, and I don't have to "restate" anything, fish evolved cause of the biological need, lgbt people have a disorder, because they have no role in the evolution. People developed sex organs by evolution, but anus and mouth are not sex organs, considering that lgbt people can't have biologically natural sex, they are a deviation, so boom, your theory of "purpose" is not valid (lgbt animals included, cause humans are animals too). Their behavior is a product of disrupted genes, but in the future, science will find a way to cure them by genetic therapy. LOL, you're so perverted, no wonder you support them... that's called primal, because such perversions were typical for e. g Roman empire. I don't like such behavior, from my point of view, sex is only vaginal, it's very pleasurable, and unlike anal/oral - it's not painful nor disgusting.
@sheepdip I never said that you should throw them off rooftops, I said we should help them cure themselves. Your country has weird laws. I was talking about the law in the most of the socialist countries.People who support lgbt usually claim they are "left-wing", but they are obviously delusional, because socialism never supported that disorder as something "normal". All of the countries you listed have been infiltrated by the lgbt lobby in their parlament, which is really outrageous. The only exception is Bulgaria, they were being blackmailed by the EU, they have to accept their perverted ways. As for Armenia, they most likely hope to enter either EU, or NATO, so they also have to adapt to western decadency.Mr Kolasinski has great reasons, I agree with him. Well, I look up to USSR, I support feminism (not western femi-nazism), and I think lgbt is a cancer for human reproduction. Yes, but dolphins and bonobos have normal sex (except those few who have the same disorder as some humans, who are too unreasonable to admit it). I didn't quote anyone, I just made a logical conclusion - they have no role in the evolution, it's the fact. I don't consider Dawkins as infallible, after all, he is British, I'm not making a generalization but -Your country is known for supporting lots of perverted things, on the other hand, your law doesn't recognize female on male rape, due to double standards. I have nothing to correct, and I didn't start the conversation, I just answered the question, which was not asked by you. What you do to yourself with your hand is a personal thing, it has nothing to do with evolution, you're not doing it to other men, or do you?If it's a disorder, and it obviously is, then it should not be treated as something "normal"... so why are you patronizing them?
It's not "wrong because I don't like it", it's wrong because it's a disorder, any disorder is a bad thing, but most people with a disorder want to cure themselves (except those people you support), I already explained that. No liberal is more moral than a communist, in fact, liberals support the most immoral things, I'm sure even the USA republicans would agree on that (and they hate communists). My reasons are scientifically valid, and yours are influenced by your hedonistic society combined with extreme liberalism. Oh you are wrong, there are scientists who would like to repair certain mistakes in human DNA, especially those who studied eugenics.
@sheepdip Capitalism is the worst abomination of all times.Yeah, Green party is also left, but they care about more importan issues, like the environment, not about people with genetic disorder... only dumb neo-liberals care about irrelevant stuff, you're just like femi-nazis. As I said, animals are not immune to genetic disorders, frogs included. Well, bad news for you, science can already change the sexuality of several animals, including fruit flies, and mice, which means they can cure the ones who have disordered genes, it's only a matter of time when they will be able to find and cure such disrupted genes in humans: www.livescience.com/...ity-turned-fruit-flies.htmlwww.theatlantic.com/.../You're the only troll here, and a spammer, cause you're doing the same thing you already started long time ago, with your previous profiles, you're spamming on other people's opinions. Realize this - Nobody cares about your opinion, you have your answer, I have mine, and I won't change it, no matter what you say, I don't spam on your opinion, and I would appreciate if you stop spamming on mine, good bye :)
@sheepdip Nope, I'm antifascist, but I don't support western "antifa", because they are fake left-wing who support neo-liberal perversions. Yup, and I showed you that scientist already can cure mice and fruit flies from that disorder, in the future, they will be able to cure humans too. No, as I said, you're a troll here, you're spamming on other people's opinins, just like you did with your previous profiles, the only thing different now is - you haven't started bullshitting with your quasi-philosophy yet, because you know that lots of other people would recognize you, but I have anyway ;)
@sheepdip That scientist is just being realistic, it's completely ethical because it's just fixing a disorder (I already explained why it's a disorder from a biological point of view, and so did mr Kolasinski, who is also an atheist). Nobody calls me an idiot, and don't worry, I know who you are, you can't trick me by using slightly different vocabulary, I see right trough you mr troll ;)
@sheepdip You're cute when your pretend to be someone else. Oh you know very well cause we had such conversations many times before, no need to act... you're deep into "no true lgbt fallacy" (just paraphrasing your old profile's quasi-philosophical nonsense) 😂😂😂The scientists proved everything you need to know in the article, the evidences are very obvious, but it seems you either can't comprehend them, or you won't.
@sheepdip LOL, dude, I know it's you, stop pretending, you're pathetic :DYour jokes? Ha! You finally admit, those were your fake profiles after all... good, but I knew that already ;)Yup, I am big and smart girl, that's how I figured you out :)Oh, you started pretending again, wow, no wonder, cause you were playing that game with your previos profiles too :PDude, the first article is from the LiveScience. com, and the second one was from The Atlantic online magazine (which is also dedicated to scinence) - they know better than you do. I have absolutely good reason for my belief, and as I said, there are lots of other people who are atheist, and share my opinion.LOL, hahaha, heathen wouldn't critique my arguments and neither would real atheists (from USSR and other ex or still existing socialist countries).Yeah, of course you admit my intellectual skills 😏Hahaha, as if... dude, I know it's you... you said lots of things which revealed who you are... especially about calling socialism a "cancer", you have the same opinion about feminism too. Ah, and by the way, you used these in your former profiles too:"This will be my final message in this chain" "I'm done with you"... ETC - and then continue spamming 😜Yeah, you're totally hilarious and desperate 😁Have a nice day too mr troll 😜
@sheepdip LOL, dude, you wouldn't be doing it if you were incapable of hiding the evidence. I know that you are using either proxies, or vpn, or some kind of software for hiding the ip adress... so don't play dumb ;)Yeah, sure Chris, wow, you are so eloquent 😂 (unlike your previous profiles) - good, keep it up, maybe you'll get nominated for the Oscar award 😁The argument is from science, not religion, I'm not a Christian. LOL, doubt it as much as you want, it won't change the facts :)Hahaha, right, I'm like Stalin huh? :DWell I never said theists had the right arguments, unlike us atheists 😎Depends on which ones, and they hate it mostly because they were brainwashed by the western propaganda. The other factor was Stalin's tyranny towards those countries, but that has nothing to do with communism. Dude, you're way below my level, and you said lots of things agains socialism and feminism on your older profiles. Haha, very funny, you were using the same phrases, not just the same language, you can't play that game with me, I know it's you 🙄Yup, you're desperate, oh right, and you're using the same method of replying with *quoting me* - hahaha, one more clue to comfirm my suspicions 😈It doesn't matter who wrote it, right? That would be "ad hominem" as your older profiles would start bullshitting 😂The article clearly said that the sexuality can be changed, by altering genes, that's just a polite thing to say to people who have a disorder, in order to encourage them to seek cure for themselves. Hahahaha, LOOOL, everyone can write on wikipedia, it's not an evidence, their "sources" are all just a neo-libral propaganda. What makes you think I'm against the state having more interaction with its population?
@sheepdip Nope, I'm not "diverting" anything, my point is - I know it's you, the same troll who always spams on other people's opinions (and it's not even your question). You were brought up well? Somehow I doubt it, people who are brought up well don't spam on other people's opinions... especilly considering the fact this is not your question (unless you're the asker too, which would clearly prove you have multiple accounts). The scientists proved it, but they have to be "politically correct" - So they can't use the term "disorder", as I explained: Because of the neo-liberals and lgbt lobby, they always whine about it... just like you do. They wouldn't be able to complain in some socialist country like North Korea, but unfortunately, most of the world doesn't have that kind of government, capable of keeping the order and discipline. You know very well I told you many times, don't play dumb.
No, they hate Stalinism, they don't know what communism is, cause no country ever was a communist country, they were socialist countries. Communism is a classless, stateless and moneyless society, it never existed (yet). Unfortunately, lots of the residents of the ex socialist countries were brainwashed by the western-imperialist propaganda and the church... though, some of us still know that socialism was way better. Dude, you have no arguments, but as I said, and I repeat again (as I did with your previous profiles) - I don't care what you think anyway, this is my opinion, and I won't change it no matter what you say. State corruption is more occurent in capitalist countries, and the bread lines were only in several countries which had unintelligent dictators (e. g Romania). Dictatorship is good only if you have an intelligent dictator, and in that case, it's much better than democracy - system made by criminals, for the criminals to rule, and masses dumb voters controled by the church... to vote for them.You're mixing socialism with communism, just like you're mixing feminism with feminazism (as I said, you're just proving who you really are) ;)I'm not here for the discussion, I just came here to answer the question, I don't care what you or anyone else thinks, my answer is directed to the asker, which is not you (and I repeat again, I explained that to all of your former profiles, if you don't remember, but I know you do, you're just playing dumb). Yeah, sure, idioms exist... as well as idiots who spam on other people's opinions... desperately thinking that you can change it (Wishful thinking). I have my evidences, I don't need any other, as well as I don't need your spamming, and your capitalist conspiracy theories.
Dude, I was just paraprasing your quasi-philosophy from your previous accounts, you know that very well... you are not credible in any account related to the subject, you're just a pseudo-scientifical spammer who trolls on the GaG, because you have no life. Triggering a behaviour change causes their sexuality to change, as it was explained, don't make me repeat myself, cause I don't like repeating facts to ignorant people like you, it's the same old thing like with your previous profiles. I don't need to "prove" anything, this is my opinion, and as I fucking said, I won't change it no matter what you say, now fuck off, this is not your question and I don't fucking care what you think.Bullshit - wikipedia is full of fake information, I know it because most of the information about the history of my country are fake (I live here so I know better). Yup, their sources are all neo-liberals and lgbt lobby, their titles mean nothing to me.Marriage was made for men and a women combined (I exclude neo-liberal definitions cause I don't support that perverted and decadent politics) - Socialism always had the proper definition of marriage, not your neo-liberal delusions. Good bye, don't bother, cause I repeat once again - I don't care what you think, just like I didn't care what your previous profiles were bullshitting, I don't change opinions, no matter what.
@sheepdip Yes you are, and I don't tolerate liars and spammers. I don't care about your positions or ideas, I have mine. No citation needed, this is my opinion, not yours, it's not your fucking question.I proved everything necessary, you failed to understand, so I'm dismissing your from your futile attempts, just like I did your previous duplicates. I live in Europe, in one of the ex socialist countries, our economy was ruined by the capitalism and corruption because of masses of dumb people who were influenced by the church.Nope, that it my exact opinion, I firmly support North Korea, you're the troll here, and a spammer of course. Yeah, you sure do act like a five year old.Nope, not even one. No country ever was classless, stateless and moneyless, you clearly don't know what communism is, you are mistaking socialism for communism, just like any other ignorant capitalist. My parents and grandparents lived through a socialist system, and they had a much better life than I do. I don't care about your "tests", I'm here to answer the question to the asker directly, I advise you to do the same, cause I didn't aks the fucking question, I just stated my opinion, and I don't care what you think. My favorite scientists are all dead and they can't change their opinion, but feel free to use Ouija board to ask them troll.Democracy is not good, and if you're so fond of Socrates, then you would know why. See, you're not a feminist because you're mixing it with feminazis. Feminist are for equality, feminazis are female supremacists and misandrists. Dude, you were never my boyfriend, by that I mean your previosu profiles, you were just a troll & spammer, and you still are. At first I thought you were an incel, but considering you're supporting this neo-liberal nonsense, now I think you're something else. I'm not on app, I'm on the web site.
At least I taught you something - this is a Question and Answer web page, not a debate forum (but you clearly don't understand this other part). It works like this: Someone asks the question, you and bunch of other people answer it. You ask the question, and others answer it. You don't spam on other people's opinions.
PS - I'll delete all of your further attempts to spam, because I already explained everything to you, and to your previous duplicates, if you don't want to understand, you don't have to, but your whining will be in vain. Direct your opinion to the asker (just like I did) - I'm not the asker and I'm not interested in what you think. The same goes for every other spammer, you have your opinions, I have mine, and I don't care about yours - The End!
Nobody is afraid of boring people, just very annoyed. Get a life.
I'm an active participant
I'm fine with gay people doing whatever.I caution anyone against marriage gat or straight though.It's difficult and it hurts.
I support lesbian marriages, male homosexual no.
Sure, why wouldn't I?
It's none of my business
Yes, I do support gay marriage 👏🏼✊🏼💯
Not at all. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Stand tall with the truth...
Will they support my addiction.. .
I dont support black gays. I also dont care about normal marriage so go for it
I can't believe so many people said no
I support it, love is love.
Why the hell not, makes no difference to me
Sure. I see nothing wrong with it.
I do not support gay marriage.
Then all you have to do is simply not marry a lesbian!
That's a weird way to look at it, but don't worry, I don't plan on it.
I don't. marriage is between a man and a woman.
I am neutral in this issue.
I do not support gay marriage.
That's fine, just don't marry a gay guy and you'll be all set!
@JenSCDC duh im not nor do i want see gay marriage.
Yep I do
I don't support marriage at all under current law.
Stupid suckers down voting. Have fun paying open-ended alimony.
Yes. I think all can be what they want.
Wow 2019... But still these fucking Old People...
Yeah, I do.
No. It looks weird but hey it's not my life so...
No i don't
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.