If so, do you think Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey are innocent or guilty?
- innocentVote A
- guiltyVote B
Most Helpful Girl
I believe that Avery is guilty of at least one, if not both, of the crimes he wasn't sentenced for.
Come on, do you really believe that he didn't burn that cat alive on purpose? And everyone knows thats a stepping stone to something worse. If you look back into other killers pasts, you often see animal mutilation.
When I was watching the show I thought otherwise. But then I looked into it more and realized that the documentary was obviously biases and serving one purpose: showing his innocence and leaving out important things that could prove his guilt. Making a mockery of any valid piece of evidence and trying to discredit officials involved in the case. It's a really sneaky way of tricking people into immediately disliking and throwing aside evidence given by the person...
Now, there obviously were some shady things going down in the case... and it wasn't handled properly. Making a Murderer does not give both sides. If gives one sides and manipulates truths. Really the only people that got a fuller story are the jurors that were in that courtroom.
I'm going to take their word on it because it could go either way. I'm not going to say he's 100% guilty. But I definitely am leaning towards that. Either way, his case should have been a mistrial and the attorney should have been disbarred for his practices... but that doesn't mean Avery isn't guilty.
This article definitely shines some light on the things the documentary didn't show that could prove his guilt. www.pajiba.com/.../...a-murderer-didnt-present.php0