You discover the person you're dating had been arrested in the past , twice for the same crime, in connection with a murder - a shooting
There wasn't a motive or any evidence, but the police accused the person because they were the last one to see the victim alive , and they both had connections to the criminal underworld.
The judge threw the case out, and the person was awareded £50.000 compensation for wrongful arrest
Although there wasn't sufficient evidence , some people are still under the assumption the person is guilty. Would you still date that person? 😕
Would you believe their word or rumours and gossip?
Most Helpful Guy
I would date her. Innocent people get accused of BS all the time. And some people are so dumb that even when the real criminal is caught and even confesses, they still believe that the first person did it.
Think about it. Whenever someone gets arrested or accused of something and you see it on TV, do people say, "I wonder if they did it?" Or do they automatically think the person is guilty when they haven't even seen any evidence? Many people automatically think someone is guilty if they are accused. When on a jury, I would never convict someone without physical proof because realistically, people can SAY anything they want and it doesn't make it true.
Plus, killing someone isn't always wrong. If it was someone I really cared about and they killed someone while I was in a relationship with her, I would even tell her how to destroy the evidence.1
- Show AllShow Less
Most Helpful Girl
If he had a connection with the criminal underworld, I'm so gone.1