Search Results: one campaign

Enhanced Attributes
You have 6x all physical attributes, meaning you can run, jump, lift, throw, punch, kick, and so forth 6x faster/stronger/farther than peak human.

Chrononaut
You are able to make small multi-second jumps backward through time, and heal yourself with chronomancy power, and you are able to create other types of time warps including small wormholes to different places.

Regenerative Biosteel
Your Body is made of Regenerative Biosteel (Raynor's faction in StarCraft 2,) you are nearly impervious to damage and you heal when damaged anyway.

Pale Master (Necromancy specialist)
You have all the benefits of being an AD&D Lich and none of the Drawbacks. You are level 10 AD&D 3.0 Wizard level 30 Pale Master with Automatic Quicken Spell 3, as per Neverwinter Nights Hordes of the Underdark campaign.

Ability/Life Drain (Rogue)
Self Explainitory as per Marvel comics.

Pictomancer (Relm Arrowny, Final Fantasy 6)
You are able to make your sketches and paintings come to life. Sketches live long enough to attack an enemy one time. Full Color Paintings and sculptures are permanently alive.

Werebear
You can transform into a powerful Werebear with +4 AD&D 2.0 claws and teeth, meaning you can slay powerful beings such as Demi-Liches. You also have Meta-Regeneration (Wolverine). For some reference, Wolverine's Adamantium claws in Marvel comics would be +4 weapons in AD&D.

https://kvia.com/your-voice-your-vote/politics/2021/04/08/gop-group-tells-online-donors-give-every-month-or-we-will-have-to-tell-trump-youre-a-defector/
GOP group tells online donors: Give every month or ‘we will have to tell Trump you’re a DEFECTOR’

The campaign arm of House Republicans is using an aggressive tactic to push online donors toward committing to monthly contributions, telling them that opting out of having the same amount automatically charged to their credit card or withdrawn from their bank each month is an act of disloyalty toward former President Donald Trump.

With a pre-checked box on the National Republican Congressional Committee’s donation page on the GOP’s online fundraising platform WinRed, donors are opted into making monthly donations and told: “We need to know we haven’t lost you to the Radical Left. If you UNCHECK this box, we will have to tell Trump you’re a DEFECTOR & sided with the Dems.”

Following that box is another one that commits them to an additional donation on April 15. “If you want Trump to run for President this is your LAST chance to FLIP the House,” donors are told above another pre-checked box. “Change your Trump Victory Fund Status to ACTIVE now! Remain inactive = Republicans lose.”

Asking online donors to commit to making automatic monthly contributions is a standard political fundraising practice — one that allows campaigns, parties and organizations to tap into and budget around a consistent stream of cash. Pre-checked boxes that commit donors to those monthly contributions aren’t new, either: ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising platform, allows some groups to use such boxes.

But Republicans — including Trump’s 2020 campaign — have gone to new lengths to tap into Trump’s popularity and strong-arm supporters into regular, automatic contributions.

I am confused on why they would rather spend the money on campaigns to elect Joe Biden when they could have used this money to build up great schools in poverty. I’m talking about state of the art. There is one example of a high school that was built with $100M dollars and is beautiful from inside out.
Do you think the money was better spent for Joe Biden’s campaigns or should they have invested into black communities?

So apparently, the High Court here in England's now ordered that part of the impending 2021 census guidance, accompanying the question on a person's sex (which will include a question about gender identity as well as the one about a person's legally registered sex for the first time, with the LGBTQ lobbyists citing it as a "step in the right direction")- which would have allowed people to use the sex and/or gender listed on their passports, and change it without a legal process- should be withdrawn.

This was thanks to campaign group 'Fair Play for Women'. which seeks to defend "the sex-based rights of women and girls", having launched a crowdfunded legal action against it, arguing that the census guidance on the question, "What is your sex?" was unlawful, and calling it "sex self-identification through the back door". After a court hearing on Tuesday, Mr Justice Swift ruled that the guidance should be changed to say individuals should only respond with the answer on their birth certificate or gender recognition certificate - a document which allows trans people to change their legal gender. He said he was satisfied the campaign group was "more likely than not to succeed" on its case, regarding the legal meaning of sex as defined in the legislation, with a full judicial review hearing set to take place next week before the census day.

Speaking before the hearing, Dr Nicola Williams, director of 'Fair Play For Women', said: "If we don't have good data on sex we can't monitor inequalities due to sex, and if we can't measure it, we can't make good policies to remedy it." The LGBTQ lobbyists, though, have been incensed by this legal action, decrying FPfW as "inherently sexist and transphobic", and declaring ideological war on the 'Right-wing Feminist Conservative Hate group'. So then, who do you think'll win the judicial review hearing- the feminists, or the LGBTQs? Who would you rather won? And what would the best case scenario end-result be, in your opinion?