Search Results: sexual limits

Christian families: families that are based on Christianity made in a Foreign Culture by foreigners. limited by morals based on irrational approach to define "good and bad". limited freedom of will for children mostly with creating a wide range of different kinds of fears in their minds. making children to have a closed irrational view of their sexuality and sexual and Emotional needs, that causes many teens reject their basic needs for a long time that will take away their mental health more and more and increases the fears made in their childhood day after day. Children in these families can be successful mostly as random routine people but not as rational thinkers.

Anti-[Christian families]: these are people who are born in Christian families and dare to reject the force of morals on themselves mostly when they become teenagers. their rejecting is not backed up by a whole body of knowledge of religions and beliefs so they mostly reject anything with the title of "religion". some of them are anti-social in teenage years and will remain like that their whole life making their lives emotionally unstable that effects their success in society while some others are or will become more moderate when they grow up and try to increase their knowledge and find their own way. these people can be either very Successful or will be unsuccessful, the rate of success between them will be very unstable.

[Anti-Christian] families: these families are mostly made by men and women of higher classes. they are mostly Scientists who have a wide range of knowledge about Philosophy, religions, races and Anthropology, Psychology as well as their own profession. they build their families on strong rational basis in a patriarchal body based on love under the freedom of will. Children in these families have the opportunity of being taught about almost everything including rational behavior, freedom, self conciousness, emotional and sexual freedom and support and can be most successful.

Guy 1.
Pros- intellegant, Dominant, Caring, sweet, confidant, 8/10 in looks, high sexual drive, high sexual chemistry, his intentions are clear (wants a serious relationship), direct, protective, studies psychology, works as a life coach (full time), mature, understands your quirks, gives you the right amount of emotional and verbal attention, strong need to care for him, affectionate.

Cons- unstable family, depression, arrogant, you're shy around him, hasn't been in a relationship for four years, slight anger issues but haven't seen them, stopped talking to you randomly for no reason but apologised.

=says the right things but actions sometimes fall short, but is getting better.

Guy 2.
Pros- funny/ fun to be around, ease of conversation ( instantly "clicked"), 8.5/10 in looks, caring, high sexual drive, studying engineering, confidant, sweet, shows interest, thoughtful, comfortable, open and urges me to become more confidant in myself, affectionate.

Cons- arrogant, lack of patience, limited verbal affection, trust issues, a little bit controlling, last relationship was 1.5 months ago, doesn't want you to meet his friends/ family, doesn't get you sometimes.