Search Results: shy guy and attraction

Women are fooling themselves nowadays or are just not quite sure where equality starts from. Say we got your equal pay and opportunity to look satisfying on the paper, and we're already past the point of physical differences as they don't matter anymore. But do normal women NOT want to be dominated, taken care of, paid for and guided by the male figure, yet? I don't think so!
Men don't mind shy, inferior or equal female sex partners or love interests, but women do, and will always do! It's psychological and it shapes up to a mockery of its own: science "says" equality FTW! Or as does the media, be it conservative or liberal, but as you scrape off the surface of any relevant field of science, especially the social ones and psychology, you're up to a shocker.
Doesn't it show that liberal activism concerned with women's issues is all together disconnected from reality, but we're still taking it for granted?
Don't get me wrong, I wish if women were programmed to want to be equally dominant and self controlling, but I don't see it happening whilst we're still progressing the opposite way.
Example 1 for the dim-witted: the basic rule of social attraction is that a guy will have to make the initiative, lure the woman in and take her home, otherwise it can't be a sexually appealing experience, or happen at all.
Example 2: We (men) proudly associate our preferences with visual and sensible features, thus objectifying our casual love interests and encouraging them into taking more care of their bodies. Women will rarely ever want to consciously and practically objectify a casual love interest: a hot body and an inferiorly intelligent or non-purposeful approach will usually never lead to bed. Women don't even admit their will to solely select men on basis of their hot body features, whereas a man will gladly engage in a mind game to bend a mentally or emotionally unattractive woman to their well, if they had the desired body features.