Search Results: differences in sex

Why does one type of girl have mostly guy friends, another type of girl has mostly girl friends? Same with guys, why does one guy get along with mostly girls, and another type of guy hangs out with only guys? Sure there is a type of both genders that can get along with both genders with no difference. But I've had a girl admit to me she only likes hanging out with guys, and I know I do better hanging out with girls. What I think it is, is that it matters if the person is an attractive person or not, I feel like people like to be surrounded by people who like them. If a guy or girl is attractive then the same gender will not want to hang out with them if they felt like they were less attractive, and cause them to have self esteem issues. Maybe the attractive person has self esteem issues and only likes the gender they are attracted to. Obviously one person isn't friends with only the oppisite gender. Like one attractive girl will have a girl friend, but the MAJORITY of their friends are the oppisite sex. Also attraction isn't just physical, they maybe attracted to their personality or worth?
here's the main question, do some type of people surround themselves with the oppisite gender for a reason or purposely? And why do you suppose that is? If you are one of those people, feel free to tell us why, theirs no shame in it. I dont think its being shallow, I dont think its wrong, its just what we do naturally because it works.

Title.

We as guys often refer to attractive girls by a number of different adjectives: Pretty; cute; hot; sexy; lovely; gorgeous, etc. My question to you is this-- what is the real difference between any of them? I often see girls on here asking odd questions such as "Hey guys which do you prefer, cute girls or sexy girls?" And my answer generally is, "Yes."

The reason-- for the decision to not entertain a choice between the two I mean-- is that *they're the same damn thing.* Either a girl is attractive enough that you would date her or want to kiss her or have sex with her, or she's not. Period. The rest is just splitting hairs in my opinion. If she's not attractive enough that you'd want to bang her, then how on earth is she "cute, but not hot?" Cute implies physical attraction at least on some level. So if she's not attractive enough to want to get with, why are you using any of those adjectives at all? Or, conversely, if she IS attractive enough, why not use any of them interchangeably?

I'm not suggesting that all attractive girls are EQUALLY attractive, I mean there's the 10 scale for a reason ("she's a 7/10" as opposed to "she's a 9/10" or whatever), but how does saying like "She'd be hotter if only blah blah blah" have any different meaning than "She'd be sexier if only blah blah blah."

No difference from what I can see. ^ The girl above is cute AND hot AND pretty AND sexy, not one or the other. Anyway, tell me. What do you guys think?