You correctly cite a blog but the study that you use defines men at high risk with the normal male, that is a male who has had multiple sex partners before marriage. They were studied against a population of males who were monogamous with their monogamous wives. Of course there incidents of cervical cancer was low. The conclusion was that minute high risk for human papilloma virus or HIV had a lower incidence of infection if they were circumcised. Most guys are at high risk especially in today's society. The study you cite is leads to the conclusion exactly the opposite of what you think you read.
@KattFeesh I see, so by it's very design the inner foreskin isn't keratinized like other areas and is therefore more likely to become infected with HPV that could go on to cause Cervical Cancer. Hence when circumcised most of this area is removed, therefore reducing the risk. I still don't agree with the practice because I think so long as safe sex is practiced and you get tested for STD and STI's before unprotected sex you should be no more at risk either way. Thanks for pointing that out too because I evidently didn't read the article carefully enough or go into much detail about it.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
LOL why not :(
@LeeDynastyy because to me it's disgusting. There's a higher incidence of viral infections past in uncircumcised males including HIV hepatitis C and human papilloma virus the cause of penile cancer and cervical cancer in women. Circumcised penis is much prettier to look at. I just told you some of the reasons I do not wish an argument and I will not answer you
woah woah woah calm down, l wasn't going to start an argument.
@LeeDynastyy sorry but this website is full of ignorant people with no education no medical background and a load of crap. Excuse me but I thought you were one of them
No, its completely fine because i know EXACTLY what you are talking about. So many people are immature and get offended by anything, it gets super annoying. Trust me I've been on this site for a while. I was just curious because you said, "I will not have sex with a guy who is not cut". Really? like I get that you prefer circumcized, but is it THAT important to the point where you would not even have sex with ANYONE, even if you loved the guy?
@LeeDynastyy first of all I wouldn't get into a relationship with a guy who was not circumcised. So I'd never find out if I was in love with him. Falling in love is not like flipping a switch to turn on the lights. It is a gradual process and includes for me a sexual activity. There would be no sexual activity to carry the relationship further.
Okay cool, but dont you think there is much more to a guy than circumsized / uncircumsized? Is it really wise to decide who to fall in love with or date based on just ONE trait? Haha i get u prefer circumsized, but I think you're really really really limiting yourself by doing that because it's just 1 thing u know?
@LeeDynastyy I am not limiting myself that's ridiculous. In United States 70% of the men are circumcised. And I don't want to risk an infection cervical cancer. There are millions of guys in the United States I'm not limiting myself to anyone except protecting myself from sucking some disgusting piece of germ infested penis
@LeeDynastyy you're doing what I told you not to when that is arguing goodbye
@Starex I am tired of writing the same thing down over and over again. I suggested you read the answers that other people have given any other opinions. I am putting you on block because I am tired of this entire conversation and people who will not read
What? That wasn't even me
I agree. It should be up to the guy. Parents shouldn't be allowed to unless its a serious medical reason
That is basically incorrect. When you get your facts you make them up out of the sky? The frenulum is the most sensitive part of the penis.
oh im sorry, i didn't know you had a dick... and you're wrong, having a circumcision removes the most sensitive part of the penis
@KattFeesh actually it's true. The penis can have up to around 20,000 nerve endings. 10,000 of them are in the foreskin.
@Octavius I've seen a lot of circumcised guys and there is no ugly scar. Unless you are gay I certainly have seen more than you. Are you gay? As far as sensitivity the head of the penis does fine, the frenulum is extremely sensitive and I have yet to find a guy who was circumcised he didn't have more than adequate sensation. Your defensive crap is just that – the number 20,000 to 70,000 is just made up exaggerated and claimed to be cited in research done in the 1930s but when you look it up it's not even there. And even if there were which there are not, the variability of nerve endings is enormous some resingponding to touch heat and other sensations. Not all of them are nerve endings that result in a pleasurable sensation. You guys are just full of baloney you haven't read a fuck thing except what you read on websites like this. Go to a website called the circumcision decision
@KattFeesh stop talking bs, guys with foreskin are more sensitive than guys without
I have never seen an ugly scar on a circumcised guy. You just make stuff up
iv seen plenty in porn
That's why it's in porn. That's why you believe everyone should have an 8 inch penis. Using porn as an example is just ridiculous
Why do you feel that?
Ethically, I'm not really comfortable with circumcision when performed on children so I'm a little bit ehh about that. But purely physically, I also just think uncircumcised looks better.