" Also promenet features are more in you face as boobs are or dicks for guys, it looks extra highlighted on the body". I totally understand that boobs are prominent features and are right in the face also there is always boob bulge through the clothes and it gives a certain shape to the woman's dress and hence can't be ignored at all.But dicks? What do you mean by stating dick here... dick of a man (can) have similar sexual effects on a woman as does boob do on men?And as a woman what's your perspective about the " forbidden" boobs. LoL. Attractive and appealing especially when exposed since it's a rare sight?
Also I have a question why is the legs of a woman marketed as sexually appealing trait... everywhere in movies/porn/modelling women flaunt their legs in short dresses while men rarely show their legs by wearing short dresses... infact men show /flaunt oiled waxed torso but not legs. . why
yes dick are sexually arausing to women as are boobs to men, now ofc not any dick etc., its about the whole body alwaysabout boobs being attractive it really depends on how they look personally to me, not all are prettyseeing naked people is sexually arausig to most or disturbing since its a rare sight and deemed publically unacaptableAnd about legs, i dont find legs really all that sexually attractive be it women or men, its just that body parts are sexualized and women body parts are sexualized by society more than mens but that doesn't men women dont find male bodies sexually arauzingoneexample is body hair, where people find it disgusting on women but not on men, that makes no sense but its just how we are treated in society, hair on women is shocking while normalized on men
Hairy chest on men is equally shocking and seen as disgusting to people including the women! It's just that hair on a man's legs and arms is expected, accepted and seen as normal.
How do you think about female torso and exposed boobs?
Not attractive, appealing and erotic even if it's fit toned shapely and perky tits?
I can recognise what's attractive but not at all interested, I'm straight
Am not talking about being interested. Am just saying do you think that a shirtless female torso is much more appealing and aesthetic than a shirtless male torso?
And as you said there are many bad things about male torso , and having hair growth on it unlike female torso is one of the ugliest and creepiest part of male torrso?
Science suggests females are considered more attractive than men.
Why so.And forget science , how about your views
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
You mean exposed fit male belly region makes you sexually aroused?How about looking at the fir flat belly of a woman with nice tight perky boobs?
Frankly, women's body's are repulsive to me, but I can recognize an attractive on.
You mean woman's body is generally sexually repulsive/unappealing although woman's body has much more aesthetics, beauty and shape?
But you get to see exposed male torso so easily everywhere
That doesn't make the male torso unattractive. I like men, so therefore I am more likely to be attracted by the male torso. I have never been attracted to the female torso.
Is the exposed male torso erotic/sexually appealing as well as boobs are to men?
In some ways, yes. Maybe not to the exact degree as boobs are though...
Boobs are sexually arousing to you women as well?
No. Only if the women is Lesbian or bisexual. Straight women are not typically attracted to boobs
Boobs do not sexually arouse me
What exactly do you mean