Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Ummmm no offense, but Tulsi is an idiot and worse she would be a threat to national security. She actually believes the Assad regime is the victim of US bullying
@Sinnfeiner, golly, who could possibly imagine that the U. S. was trying to do to Syria what it did to Libya? I mean, the U. S. doesn't engage in regime change, right?And yeah. She's a threat to our national security because Assad is planning to attack us. He must be stopped.
Assad is a barbarian and a monster, a mass murder and an offender of human rights violations nearing the scale of Hitler, funny how no one objected to that regime change. The idea that she met with both sides in Syria and cozied up to Assad is scary in itself, but I mean if you are okay with not trying to keep ruthless dictators in check then by all means, please support someone who has absolutely no clue about foreign affairs. I have always felt that a pre-requisite To be president is to have served in the military. People like her lack the ability to make the tough calls because she lives in a fairytale world and has never had to be involved in a military decision that affects the lives of other people
@Sinnfeiner, do you support Trump? Did you support Obama? How 'bout Dubya? How much military experience did any of them, their VPs or their appointees have?I have many reliable connections who would, with very credible documentation, contradict the assertions that Assad is "a barbarian and a monster, a mass murder and an offender of human rights violations nearing the scale of Hitler". It makes me wonder how people can be convinced to believe such hyperbolic nonsense. If you are honest, what do you actually know about Syria or Assad, aside from what you glean from mainstream media? I'm not saying that I know more about him than you do. But that means that I couldn't possible have evidence to back your assertions.I am reminded of the excuses for our overthrow of Saddam. All the "experts" swore that he had WMDs. But oops, they actually lied through their teeth. It was experts like Joseph Wilson, who said there were no WMDs, who turned out to be right. But we all know were Wilson's honesty got him. Do you remember Nayirah who tearfully claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers tossing infants out of incubators but was later outed as the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U. S. and had lied through her teeth? That's how the powers that be convince citizens to that wars of imperialism are actually desperate efforts to defend human rights. The logic is, we have to destroy countries and murder and displace millions in order to end their oppression. In the meantime, we'll seize their oil fields, natural resources, and gold stockpiles, and build a few military bases. In regards to Assad's use of poisonous gas on his own people, that information has been debunked even by the UNODA. But our media continues to stick to the old narrative which conveniently serves to support the U. S. government's regime change agenda. Do the Syrian people really need to the U. S. to free them from oppression? If so, then why aren't we attacking Saudi Arabia?
As far as Tulsi Gabbard's inexperience and naivete are concerned. She did serve two tours in a medical unite during the Afghan war. She has been a member of the Armed Services committee for 6 years. She was a member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs for 6 years. And she is a member of the Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy. It's possible that she has had access to more information than do average people who are subjected to manipulation by the mainstream media echo chamber of manufactured consensus?
I don't want to make predictions but I'm hoping for Sanders, Biden or Warren.
Kamala Harris? She got owned at the end man
It's possible. But what's her stance on nazis?
Sad thing is Buttigeg isn't exactly wrong
That is funny.
Careful. That's what they said about Hillary
Nah Warren is done for after Tuesday night.Sanders is just an old idiot. The other three might have a shot. Of those three, Yang is my favorite.
She has no idea what she is talking about either lol her views on Assad and the US involvement in Syria are so warped I find it hard to believe she actually went there not once but twice and spoke with both sides
@Sinnfeiner and by spoke you mean with a bullet through his fucking head, cause we don't negotiate with dictators right?
I mean she went there twice with a congressional fact finding mission, saw first hand what was happening to the freedom fighters and the civilians caught in the middle. She then met with The Assad regime and actually sided with him, shrugging off the gassing and killing of his own people and called the opposition to the Assad regime, terrorists. You can look it up for yourself
The reason why is because the Dems bring nothing to the table except open borders which the majority don’t want. The economy is the best ever, jobs are plentiful for all races, ages and education levels, there’s more peace and stability than with Obama and the president just won another victory over the wall. The Dems only offer us what we had with Obama which the majority don’t want again
Read my reply to the first post
@reptocarl I already did and gave it a thumbs down because you're delusional and out of touch with reality.
I posted the facts bud
@reptocarl You posted the delusional fantasies of old man with dementia and alzheimer's.
Stock market speaks for itself bud
@reptocarl Seek help. You're out of your mind you crazy old coot.
Not one person agrees with you. Look at your down votes vs your up votes. I’m laughing at you
Anon you are the one who is delusional
@Rissyanne oh god, not you.
Another picture of your mother how sweet
@Rissyanne good one. Don’t waste your time with this backward idiot
@reptocarl he’s an idiot that’s for sure
Paige is right.
1. Bernie and Yang2. One of Bernie's burns or Yang's opening statement3. Bernie or Biden4. Dunno what Trump thinks lol, probably jerking off to some porn stars
Agree. They are the front runners to beat.