Love your opinion. Thanks for sharing
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Diversity kills of nothing. It just spreads things out. Tribalism is the enemy of diversity, since tribalism enforces conformity.
@HereIbe Um you obviously know nothing about biology.Even in same race couplings, several mutated genes aren't passed on to the offspring.Sickle cell anemia is prevalent in blacks, but not so much whites. A mixed child often loses genes for conditions general to one race or both altogether.Tribalism enforces conformity to that communities standards silly.If it's a community fine with diversity, then those against diversity are excluded.Tribes can only happen if there's people in them.Countries are just mega sized tribes so, you can see why diversity just naturally occurred with all the blood mixing.Hell, there's no pure blood anyone.Even American whites are a minority compared to European counterparts.In fact, you'd be rejected and killed by other whites without diversity.We go to war with Europe - let's see how many of you white Americans aren't gunned down by other whites.I can't believe I'm explaining this to a 47 year old.This is like basic common sense.
I'm a biologist, and you obviously do not understand genetics in the least. A "mixed" child gets half of each parent's load, and there is NO PREFERENCE as to whether or not it is a "mutated" gene.Likewise, tribalism is ALL ABOUT CONFORMISM. I get it, you're an idiot.
@HereIbe You're not a biologist, nice lie though.Its basic knowledge that a gene that is dominant in one parent, but recessive or not even present in the other, has a lower chance of passing on, as opposed to two parents with that same dominant gene. Different races contain different dominant and recessive genes for illnesses.If a white guy is dominant for familial melanoma, and produces with a white woman also dominant for familial melanoma - the child is highly likely to be born with the gene.If he marries an Asian woman who has no gene, the chances of it passing to the offspring drops significantly.I learned that in high school biology.Lol some biologist you are.You even said "diversity spreads things out," you mean spreads disease?That's odd, seeing how dominant or recessive genes for disease dont matter in being eliminated out of the gene pool... yet somehow they can just spread UNDER THE SAME EXACT CIRCUMSTANCES.Freshmen level biology dude 😆
@HereIbe Some diseases require two recessive genes from BOTH parents to affect the offspring.So, if one doesn't have it, no disease, and no gene in the offspring for the disease lolThat offspring reproduces with another person without that gene too - bam - eliminated right out their gene pool lol.Guess how that happens? DIVERSITY.Not just different races, but biological DIVERSITY within even people of the same race.Diversity is natural.So biology that old man 😆
You moron, dilution of frequency DOES NOT DESTROY THE ALLELE. You DO, off the top of your head, know what an allele is, right? Only the stupidest of the stupid say that someone "has the genes" for something. Everyone has the SAME GENES. You will now prove that you are a moron by your response to this basic biological statement.
@HereIbe Omg you can't be serious dude. THE ALLELE HAS TO EXIST FIRST.If one parent has an ABNORMAL ALLELE, lacking in protein or some shit, will that allele magically go to the offspring?ONLY IF ITS DOMINANT, OR TWO RECESSIVE ALLELES, ONE IN ONE PARENT, ONE IN THE OTHER.But even if its dominant, if the other parents makeup produces enough proteins, it can literally cause the abnormal dominant gene to never show disease in the kid.Is the gene still there for a generation? DUH.Now when said offspring produces with a person NOT HAVING THAT ABNORMAL ALLELE, AND THEIR ALLELE HAS BEEN RENDERED HARMLESS, will the offspring magically have the disease somehow?NO.It's not gene dilution dude, its genetic evolution.Two people of diverse backgrounds, are less likely to share the same abnormal alleles. Yeah that 1% makes a huge difference.Due to that-ITS BEN OBSERVED MULTIPLE TIMES OF GENES RELATED TO DISEASE BEING BRED OUT OF A SPECIES BLOODLINE DUE TO DIVERSE BREEDING POOLS.Dogs are the best example. Diseases that a wolf can catch, dogs can not - vice versa.But wait? Aren't dogs descendants of wolves?Shouldn't every dog have all the same alleles as a wolf?According to you, yes - but reality created an incredibly diverse pool of canines.What's crazy, is if you breed a wolf with a dog, the hybrid is now susceptible to wolf diseases it would have been immune to, if wolf dad has a dominant abnormal allele.See how that works mr "biologist?"
@HereIbe LOL all genes are the same? You mean the 99%?"Most genes are the same in all people, but a small number of genes (less than 1 percent of the total) are slightly different between people."1% is slightly DIFFERENT.MOST (not all genes,) are the same in all people.https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/basics/geneYou're gonna argue against the NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE on that one?God you're arrogant and stupid really.
No, you inbred moron, I did not say that "all genes are the same", I said we all have the same genes. VERY DIFFERENT statements, you worthless piece of shit. We DO all have the same genes. We both have two copies of the "sickle cell gene", for example, no matter what. It's a vital gene. Without it, we'd do poorly.
Exactly HOW does "diversity" change DNA sequences or "kill off" ENTIRE GENES?
Thats complete rubbish. Diverse societies are the most successful such as the Roman Empire, China, British Empire, Ottoman Empire, Mongals etc.. etc.. etc..
And they all fell, China multiple times even.British Empire served its people first.
You say that but China is by far the most stable country in history and endures to this day. Also it was a normal cycle to have countries rise and fall through history, this idea of "permanence" is only really existed since WW2.
But won't be boring if only black guys are around right?
@Hellfire579 That would also be boring. I like diversity better, if it's White, Asian, Arabs and Latino that would be best.I'm not attracted to Black guys, only the one heavily mixed with White (like Neymar).
People will always find a reason to have conflict. Such as making up the idea that people are different "races" in the first place even though there is no scientific basis supporting this.
@Soteris I am gonna assume you are retarded and haven't thought about this at all.
Why? I am just speaking the truth.
I did, thats why I am here.
Democrates hate diversity. Democrats want homogeneity as much as Republicans do, they just have different parameters, but Democrats hate diversity, especially any sort of intellectual diversity. You're the same as each other, both nothing but totalitiarian goons.
Do you even know what homogenized means? I'm just asking.