I'm also in favor of smaller governments and partially because a lot of governments seem to find an easy time growing and taking more and more control over our lives. They seem to have a very difficult time shrinking. So it's a much more costly error as I see it that's difficult to reverse (sometimes seemingly hopeless in any reasonable period of time) for governments to grow in power and size. So I prefer to err on the smaller size.
And since I favor the direction of free markets and free speech where people voluntarily exchange things with each other without an authority figure intervening, consumer awareness is important to me. Of course, there could be snake oil salesmen out there ripping people off (and a similar analogy for those who spread horrible ideas). So individual responsibility becomes extremely important with that freedom to freely pick and choose what we buy or subscribe towards, and so does education. So I value even more value on parenting and education than usual since free people have a greater individual responsibility in contrast to controlled people in the same way that adults have a greater individual responsibility than children.
So I [place] even more value on parenting and education than usual since free people have a greater individual responsibility in contrast to controlled people [...]
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Didn't go as indepth as this but i 100% agree with you.
Interesting how you have allowed your mind to be enslaved to a "two party" paradigm.
@HereIbe I am not a slave to the two party mentality. I believe both have major flaws and major good points. However, it is near impossible to become president without registering with one or the other. When was the last time we had a president who was neither Republican or Democrat? A single person holds no power on their own. You need powerful allies and that sometimes means giving them some concessions for their help. What other way in American politics can someone make a difference if they do not have the backing of one of the major parties?
Which so-called "God"?
@HereIbe there's only one that exists. Plus... I feel like the title "Christocrat" makes that pretty clear.
Oh, you mean the God of the Hindus! Okay!
@HereIbe the god of the hindus does not exist. There is one God and that is the God of the Bible.
Since people do it based on policy ill clarify a bit since i know some of these in my list will make people assume i must be aligned with the "Liberals" (Marxists) but i actually oppose them.- Pro Direct democracy and has a detailed system thought out on how to implement it safely in my country in a way its most productive and hardened against manupulation.- Anti mass migration but pro asylum. In my eyes refugee centers are a good thing but should only ever be used as a tempoary stsy while they apply for legal citizenship under any (safe) country in the world until accepted. These refugee's then have to follow regular strict migration picy just like anyone else to ensure they are compatible with society.- Pro a complete revamp of the education system turning it into a free market of knowledge rather than mandatory classes. This is cheaper, avoids colledge dept, prevents indoctrination, is tailored to the child and creates a healthy knowledge economy.- Free speech must be preserved at all costs but if your words have an illegal action associated with it such as commanding someone to commit a crime you will be prosecuted for the action and not the words.- Anti LGBT because i see it as a group maximizing identity differences to rob these individuals of their own identity and voice. I support your sexuality and identity but not this movement or subculture.- The concept of nations is a good idea because of the radical differences in the preferences of how society's should be run. Unifying this means dictating your will upon others which is evil. Instead leave each society to their own unless they wish to unify and culturally align.- Radical equality is terrible because it ends with everyone having nothing and potential not being used. Instead we need to strive for a fair system that only judges people based on provably relevant criteria.
- If it harms nobody it is not a crime.- Universal basic income will cause instant inflation because it raises the bar of 0. This makes people poorer not richer.- The government needs to compete in area's where a true free market is not possible to force good behavior without resorting to regulation. These ventures should be self sustaining but adhere to ethical principles and be non profit by default.- One of these are banks of which the government run banks need to give fair interest rates to stop the money from flowing out of society.- Plans need to be made to cut our economy loose from private banking since monetizing the center of the economy is like having a heart that swallows up your blood.- Guns are an equalizer and required for self defense.
So, you're neither, then? How's that work exactly?
I mean the could be a socialist, and anarchist, a social democrat, a communist or somone who takes bits from various ideologies :) Liberalism and conservatism are 2 out if a whole host of political ideas out there.
Because there is no alternative than a two-pole fake "spectrum"?
I've really better things to do with my time. Two things that open you up to how insignificant your existence is stand at the ocean or get involved with the political process.
Hmmm... Pretty wise comment thereI'm just curious in what regards you're actually conservative
Pro life, pro law enforcement, pro military, small government,
I don't mean to sound rude (because I see it as a compliment). But you don't sound very ghetto.
Well its getting out in front of the weak attacks, see when they realize I've left the plantation in saying I'm not a victim of racism, they attack my education saying I'm too uneducated to know what racism is. When I state I'm Pro law enforcement I'm a traitor to my race, When I'm open about my life and how I live and I shun this push for diversity I get called ghetto. Guess because I lack the formal indoctrination of how great diversity would be.Detroit Public Schools system 12 years, straight As' the last four. Mother graduated from Grambling with a bachelor's, eldest sister graduated Michigan State with a master's. I had mentors in the home.I've decided not to attend college.
Wow, that's fucked up...I'm glad you're redpilled. But it was kinda what I suspected, when it comes to what the other blacks would say.The weird thing is, that a lot of black people are conservative, but vote for the Democrats.
So, you're into policing for profit, for-profit prisons, the school-to-prison pipeline, allowing for-profit prison corporations to lobby for creating more "crimes" (which locks up more people in their for-profit prisons), eliminating the entire concept of liability, imprisoning children, etc.
Because there is only one way to look at politics, a one-dimensional line?
nope left, right, liberal and conservative
That sounds like a one-dimensional line: Left---Liberal---Conservative--RightHow does it have more than one dimension?
I think of it more like conservativeleft right liberal
and it auto repaired my depiction
So, you think conservative, then left, then right, then liberal? That's loony.
So, steal from those who work and hand it out to those who don't.
More specifically liberal about humanitarian issues. Conservative about economics and fiscal policy