Yawn. Ignoring the myriad contributions by females to all the things you mentioned (which you would doubtlessly find out if you cared to actually discover the long nuanced history of at least some of those inventions) is ignorant. Stay on topic.
"They are the gatekeepers of eternal life, the arbiters of morality and the conscience, and the arbiters of what it even means to be a human being." What the hell are you talking about man.
I was talking about the way evolution / natural selection works in peotic, non science jargon way.
as it relates to humans
There's no such thing as eternal life, man. And having a pussy and ovaries does not make one an arbiter of morality or conscience.
Eternal life is perhaps the impossible end goal of evolution at some point infinitely down the line. Or let's say perhaps that the end goal is ontological perfection.Mothers and the typically closer connection they have with their offspring is one example of female influence on morality and conscience. But also, if you have to choose between helping or protecting a man or woman, even if the man is weaker than the woman, most people and law makers choose to help the woman.
You're not too bright, are you?
You really shouldn’t be judging people with how narrow minded and prejudiced you are.. lol. The more conservative and prejudiced one is the less intelligent they tend to be.
We found one of those brainwashed ones lads
Or you're simply ill-educated... which is likely the case. ;)
No I'm pretty well educated as well as knowing that women have equal rights and more privileges than men in the west, knowing the strengths and weaknesses of men and women doesn't oppress anyone, knowing there's only two genders like there always has been, knowing not to entertain the mentally ill, as well as knowing the patriarchy doesn't exist which has been proven 1000s of times over but brick walls don't have brains to understand any of this
Sure, taken literally it is stupid; taken figuratively it's also stupid. Matriarchal ideology and domination isn't any better than patriarchal domination-- isn't the point that we shouldn't be dominating anyone?
Well there are many ideals that feminism has forwarded, such as workplace equality, that are a good thing. There are many other ideals, like "the future is female," that are ascribed to feminism that are inherently sexist. It's a mixed bag, but it's definitely not all bad.
it's mostly bad nowadays, what else do those crazy feminists want now? they have got it all already so they should stfu about it already... and it shouldn't be 'the future is female', if they truly meant equality they would say 'the future is equality' or something
Balance is good.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
If you think about it, "you" and I can never actually inhabit the future, as it refers to a point in time that is not yet the present. And when the future point does arrive in present timeline, it's no longer the future, it's just experienced as "now". So we are all "now", and can never be anything BUT "now". Okay I'm getting existential and shit, I'll just fuck off now xD
Haha but you’re right.
That's some of the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
@ThatsamazingLook up the history.Use sources that have not been published by Communists/Jews.Read the Communist Manifesto.It is all there.
LOL "look up the history" oh my God you're amazing.
@ThatsamazingI did not expect much cognitive process or interest in the facts from a Communist.Most people who think that Marxism is a good idea do not know history or biology.Those who do know what Marxism is about are simply evil.
You're incredible man. Keep going.
There is so much wrong with your comment that it makes my head hurt.
While that's possible to do, it's not possible to do at scale. You can't replace an entire population that way. (P. S. While I do think the idea isn't viable, I'm not the person who downvoted.)
"Perhaps I'm wrong"
I think you're right but I thought I heard something about the y chromosome that either benefits humanity, like the hormone development that triggers in men helps activate development in women, like a brain thing or a social thing. It could also have been that the lacking of a y chromosome in the population would leave more vulnerable to genetic diversity issues. I'll have to find a source for you it was a pretty interesting clip from a documentary
@floatingboats I would think there could be problems like when there isn't enough diversity in a society with too many people related or when the royals only married other royals. As women we have varying degrees of testosterone in your hormone make up and messing around with eliminating the male contribution might not only alter the make up male babies but female too. It isn't just about genetics in the womb development but sex hormones, thyroid and adrenal gland hormone levels.
Also, to clarify, I'm not actually claiming that the future is female. I'm offering a potential interpretation of the phrase.
Oh you dirty girl. Give it to me. I love learning random facts that will never benefit me in the foreseeable future. I never even thought of embryonic growth, that's so cool. Although I do think a large enough female population could avoid genetic diversity problem, in the way you described. I heard you can have more than 10000 and be fine for many many generations. I almost feel the lack of human diversity would affect society though. Like males are generally taller, the average height would go down, maybe it would become more necessary to make steps more common or shorter? Lots of osha issues
And I too will say I'm not against anything female. But thinking about the real world ramifications is interesting
Wouldn't this be the MATRIX or that recent film I Am Mother?
What do you mean? I haven't seen I am mother and I'm not making the connection to the matrix
@floatingboats MATRIX is a world without the need for man and woman to produce a child, machines grow you. I Am Mother is a world where the human race has died above ground. But inside a mountain millions of embryos exist in tubes meant to save the human race. Machines maintain the embryos and one day it decides to raise one. The robot that takes care of her is affectionately known by her as Mother. The girl is the only human now born on the planet.
The meaning behind that phrase is not about genders but about what we attribute to genders. If we consider todays form of society to be "male", things like top to bottom hierarchy in companies for example or zero-sum games then saying the future is "female" is offering alternatives to this based on female archetypes.
Some chicks don't want equality, they indeed do want female sovereignty. Hey, that's their right to want. It's just dumb, is all.
Not all women want that.
We start out female in the womb... so... men are more evolved? 😂
@Inbox or just mutated.
@lumos mutations on a large scale to adapt to the patriarchy environment 😂😂😂
In the beginning, we all started out female. Then God came to his senses :P
@lumos Saw that one coming a mile away, thanks for being a predictable feminist 😍 Sorry! Did I "eye rape" you there? 😂😂@betaTester @SomeGuyCalledTom Lol!
Ahh... so men are inferior and should not exist?
Females also are the ones that get treated like pussies because everyone thinks we are weak since most of us just bitch about each other and try on makeup.-.I was bullied for hating makeup and I was bullied for playing video games and not trying to get attention from boys on said games
@it2ly who bullied you for hating makeup?
@Inbox you sound like a meme
@lumos Your face looks like a meme...
@Inbox nice comeback, did a five-year-old teach you that one?
@lumos No, a mutated woman named lumos did. Her teaching methods definitely rival that of Einstein, Hawking, Degrasse Tyson - oh wait, those are all men. Let's shut down Inbox's account for such comments and have him scourged for clearly being a rapist and child molester.
@lumos As a mutated teacher, your observations are spot on because only a 5 year old can recognize a 5 year old's teaching style. Tell me, is Sweden running out of money? It sure seems so LOL!!!
@Inbox wth are you on about and what does sweden have to do with any of this? :D
@nimmouser no one said that. However I can’t help but notice so many guys have felt as though this was taking a shot at masculinity and immediately trying to overcompensate. Guys that constantly overcompensate are one of the things getting the world in trouble.
@Inbox No it’s just your sex organs change bc reproduction and energy balance are real things.
@it2ly That’s terrible. I hope people stop bullying you over something so trivial. Those girls are just mad that you have natural beauty. When you’re that young constantly wearing makeup it breaks down your skin and I bet those nasty girls don’t even take care of their brushes. They’ll get older looking quicker and still be mad bc they let a deadbeat get them pregnant and stretch out their stomach.
@lumos Definitely a 5 year old mutated teacher...
@Luv2BRealExcotic13 I agree for the most part, but with some obvious differences...
"They are saying that men will be like slaves" mmm... no, I dunno about that. But "the women will be in power" yeah I think that's more accurate.
The problem I see with it is that they are already more then equal to men I don't know how far they are planning on going
I am glad you asked! It means a change in society such as new leadership structures that is not based on a top to bottom hierarchy and instead a circular team structure and other changes.
@Soteris how is that meaning summarized by the word "female?"
@Boppy that's what I was wondering.
@Boppy Just the same as the meaning of Trumps insane politics is summarized in the phrase "America first".
@Soteris So... it's barely connected to the meaning, but sounds good so they use it as a slogan?
@Boppy It is heavily connected with the word female but you need some basic understanding on the topic to understand. Just like basically all slogans.
@Soteris Ah, you compared it to "Anerica First," so I misunderstood. I suppose that in my eyes a slogan should be easy to understand and unambiguous, if it's a good one.
@Boppy There is nothing about "America first" that is easy to understand if you never heard about Trump before. Its completely meaningless by itself.
@Soteris So... are you saying "the future is female" is also meaningless by itself?
@Boppy Of course. What the fuck does "The future is female" mean by itself? Its not even a grammatically correct sentence. The only way it makes sense is if these words have special meaning for the people who use them. This is not necessarily meant for people uninterested in feminism but specifically for people already inside and knowledgeable about it.
Lol "end of discussion" uhh... okay. The actual documented long history of civilization in all its literal millions of intricacies and facets would disagree with your incredibly oversimplified statement here.
Stop making up nonsense and show us proof. Next
"Stop making up nonsense and show us proof. Next"
I did. And it's not. And even taken figuratively, it's still stupid.
So you do know what the figurative meaning behind is? What is it?
Sure. It's implying that the male-centric systems of governmental rule have, I suppose, failed in many ways at many intercessions of history, and many females feel that a future would be better defined by matriarchal rule instead. It's also implying, I suppose, that more engineering and invention will occur via females if females are given the chance, and perhaps even preferential treatment, over males. That could be a greater stretch.Part of its fallacy indeed is that YOU are asking ME (someone who wouldn't wear it) what the slogan actually means. Generally speaking... it's incumbent on the wearer or bearer of a particular slogan to be the one who actually defines it. But thus are our times.
They dont think what the actual conclusions to their actions will be, instead just believing if they push hard enough the exact thing they want will happen
Well that sucks.
That might be one of its many features 🤣
A stretch? Like, stretch marks? Nobody?Okay.
Yeah pretty cringe.
Great but that's not really what it means, does it?
Future presumably implies almost.
"women are in decline if you look at the statistics." I have no idea what this completely bonkers statement is supposed to mean.
The wage gap is widening and the 75% of retail jobs that are about to be automated mostly belong to women. STEM is currently at 83%-85% depending on the field and as you go higher in rank there are fewer and fewer women. Teaching pay is in decline and women make up 75%+ of social science graduates (a field that doesn't pay shit and that is losing respect). Millenial woman have something like 3 times the rate of depression and emotional inability that millenial men have, lowering ability and most avant-garde art, which has been dominated by women in decent years is resulting in record low profits due to the trash that's being produced not generating money (look at what female 'wokeness' did to hollywood, record profit losses)... what is so bonkers?
STEM is currently at 83%-85% *
... Okay. Well now you've actually been a bit more specific, which is nice I guess. It would be grand if you would cite any of your sources, for starters, and secondly, teacher pay being in decline has little to do with being the fault of females-- it's the fault of the people who pay them. And movies? Would be grand if you could be more specific, again, since some female-led and -dominated films in the last three to five years have been very financially successful, and good films, and then others have indeed been garbage. They aren't all in the same bag.
@SteohenCF It's typical feminism: hyprocritical, power hungry, and man hating.
@Inbox And advocacy for women’s freedom of choice... except for when a woman freely chooses a traditional role (they get scolded then) 🤣🤣🤣