That's a very nice list and I appreciate the detail. There's one out of there I don't like but there are two in there I really like. I will say you are very right about Mitch and Kennedy. Couldn't agree more on those. Course with politics it is all opinion anyway. I'll give you my favorite: Senator Josh Hawley. Thank you for that.
Thank you - and by the way, fully agree with you on Senator Hawley. I thought of naming him - and perhaps though somewhat less so, Senator Cotton - but decided I had gone on long enough I also wanted to include a couple of Democrats.Though I am of the other party, I wanted to list from both sides to make the point that there are good and honorable people across the aisle. Though I confess that I have grown increasingly disappointed in Feinstein and I think perhaps she would do well to make this her last term.That said, I do not agree with all of them, but that does not detract from their basic integrity and civic mindedness. My experience being that most politicians - foibles and all - are harder working and at least as honest as the public that routinely groups them together and stigmatizes them.
Yeah I can agree with that. There are politicians on both sides who are working hard and doing the best they can to make a positive impact on our country. You definitely have to take what the media says with a grain of salt. Course with you working in politics you know how influential they can be. Not that the entire political media is bad but a lot of them do have agendas so you do have to be careful what you watch and read. I so agree that Feinstein should make her way on out. I think most Americans can agree on that regardless if they liked her or didn't you know? Oh yeah Cotton is good too. I've only recently have heard his views on things, but yeah he's another good one in my view.
We seem to be pretty much on the same page. By the way, here is my perspective on the media - and just remember, you raised the issue so you have no one but yourself to blame. (Yes, that was a joke.)Just can't get enough of me - Do you believe the American mass media is unfairly biased? ↗
Wow you lost a ton of weight last I saw you. Thanks for your opinion.
Lol yeah I have. It's been awhile!
Hmm didn't know that.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Oh damn I didn't know that. That's what's up. I keep up with guys like Jocko and Travis Kennedy (both former seals). What do you think of Ted Cruz then?
Ted Cruz is hilarious especially when he was talking about the Pfizer abuse scandal, He also looks way better with a beard honestly I wish I could have these guys as representatives rather than Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray those guys need to leave office but I don’t think they will
Oh okay. Yeah he is hilarious lol. I remember that. You know the SpongeBob Meme with Patrick and that red and blue villian? It reminded me of that. How he had to like spell it out and everything lol.
I had to look up that meme lol, yes exactly what it was like, Ted Cruz Trey Gowdy Jim Jordan do that all the time it’s hilarious. You don’t see my governor having the same logic as these guys I swear they save way more Logic than anyone on the left it’s funny The left keeps pushing Marxism but I don’t think anyone has read Marx
Yeah I don't care what side you stand on it's hilarious to watch for sure. Yeah I've noticed the Marx stuff too. But then again I need to read the book myself.
Ok I didn’t see that one that’s hilarious. Marx wasn’t an anti capitalist he said that capitalism was a step in human evolution, but eventually society needed to move past capitalism into communism. He laid out 3 steps 1st revolution 2nd socialism with a stronge central government that forces the population to work together everyone get paid the same so everyone has the same outcome, the. Once that’s set up the government is supposed to step down. What he forgot to calculate was human greed once people have power it’s very hard to convince them to step down from that power that’s why socialism and Marxism doesn’t work ultimately capitalism is the final point in the human societal evolution and you really can’t get past that. I think you failed to understand that the government isn’t God government is human humans make mistakes and humans like to have power over their fellow man that’s never going to go away which is why libertarianism is probably the best solution do you want to get as close to human independence as possible but with some regulation in order to make sure humans don’t go off the rails and destroy the entire planet
Wow. That makes a lot of sense.
And that of course is one of the issues of the Democrat party they look at countries like Sweden back in the 1970s and want to shift to their policies nashua Sweden almost went bankrupt because of those policies now they become more capitalist than the United States
I don't know much about her but heard she was a good one.
🤔 why do you respect him?
he has integrity, insight, morality and courage-or, at least that is what he's consistently shown-watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPRH_dmFOoo
it's been edited-but all that happened on the opposing side was they looked and sounded like beaten dogs-msnbc played the whole thing.
Well he's definitely got some balls considering everyone around him including the people on his side said they found no collusion. Here's James Clapper"I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting [or] conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,”Samantha Power"I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community," Susan Rice"I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence."There's more but you get the point. Plus we all know what Mueller said who ran the report. I won't get into crowdstrike but yeah I guess he did have courage to still believe something would come out of all that.
there was collusion, however. aside from the intelligence-we also have trump's tweet: Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax... And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected. It was a crime that didn’t exist. So now the Dems and their partner, the Fake News Media,... i think i see what he was trying to do-trying to create the narrative that Clinton helped him win by letting the Russians out her in some way. we also have a confession by Putin: https://youtu.be/lMkxKC1qMnY?t=64 .
Can't go by what the Washington Post says.
even if it feature something live?
I'm confused. Is that in reference to the Russian bots? Sounds like both Hillary and Trump used those.
That's not collusion for him to say he wanted Trump to win.
but he said he directed his people to help trump. the investigation cleared her.
No he said both were helped and she used more Russian bots than Trump did.
Putin says in the video you posted that Russia helped Hillary Clinton. Maybe I interpreted it wrong. He then went on to say he wanted Trump to win. Least that's what I got from it.
he claimed she was endorsed-which was legal on her part-but how the Russians got that money was not-that was kind of a word salad. but we do know that Hillary was proven innocent. trump says the quite parts out loud-i don't know it it's out of stupidity or smugness.
They did countless investigations on Trump. All the Democrats except Schiff and Pelosi said he was innocent. All of them. And Pelosi wouldn't even stand and clap when Trump gave the last Tuskegee Airman a medal. That shows you the type of person she is.
You gotta remember dude, the Russia hoax has been going on for 3 or 4 years. And the whole time he came up innocent. I'm just going by what all them were saying. I don't know if he is or not. They said he was innocent.
he isn't-not according to the evidence-what. we also know he obstructed the investigation every step of the way-as he did with Ukraine-he was far more vocal about that-he was acquitted from that, as well because of sheer partisanship that was not hidden Graham and McConnell made that very clear-we're now, we're living Schiff's prediction. also, Robert Mueller explained that “longstanding” Department of Justice policy prevents a sitting president from being charged with a federal crime.
That's not true. At least two presidents have been charged with crimes haven't they? What evidence? There wasn't any from what they were saying. I don't know hell maybe he is guilty but you must have more inside knowledge than me because all over the news and the many Democrats I've heard all say he's innocent. So either the democratic party is lying or he's innocent. Can't be both ways.
If he isn't innocent then sure I think it's a crime and he should be tried for it, but from everything I saw he's innocent. So I don't know. Still better than the pedophile, human trafficking, fast and furious terrorists funding, drug smuggling, muderous Clintons.
all sources say that they can't or that it's complicated to imprison a sitting president-here's what's known: www.reuters.com/.../can-a-sitting-us-president-face-criminal-charges-idUSKCN1QF1D3 . the evidence Schiff laid out. i'm actually late to the party-started watching mscbc like mid last year-another independent source soon after called the ring of fire.
MSNBC you can't trust. They are Gates funded. See you gotta be careful with who's making up stuff. None of the major news companies are my sources. None. You're right. It is complicated I imagine to remove a sitting president. Here where I work in the medical field it's difficult to remove a doctor. So I get that. And I get the whole idea of impeaching Trump, removing him from office, and then prosecuting him. However why was Romney the only Republican to say he should be impeached? Some of the Democrats and none of the Republicans except Romney and maybe one other said he shouldn't. Regardless if it's difficult or not that means people are lying about it. On both sides lol.
I gave you a list of people who said there is no evidence. They must be lying. All Democrats. Some Obama appointed.
haven't steered me wrong, yet. some say Romney was bitter at losing to trump, i think he was just putting on a show to make himself look good-him talking about his faith and love of god-while in the same breath saying that he voted with trump 80% of the time-i'm sure those kids being tortured at the border couldn't give a rat's ass about his faith-i didn't buy it at all. as for the rest-they're a cult-i showed this to one trump supporter this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSESTWRJ-qI he called it ''fake news''-i even skipped to the interview. again, it was clear that the republicans were gonna be partisan from day one.
haven't steered me wrong, yet. That's because you don't realize who runs MSNBC and why they have political bias just like CNN. But we'll leave Gates alone for this. There's some other stuff here I want to address.Of course what Romney said was BS. But there's not much else say about him. Point is most of the Democrats voted to have him impeach and most of the Republicans didn't. This is despite most of the Democrats inside the investigations saying he's innocent. So again they are either lying or he's innocent. Can't be both.Now you mentioned the middle east. If you watched the entire interview and not just the part your buddy careful cuts out he starts off by talking about the crazy shit that Obama put us in over there. Continued senseless war. Feeding ISIS more guns and training them. Bombing women and children in Syria. And finalky giving Iran money when they were spitting in our faces before and during the Trump administration (I mean they continue to spit at us anyway). He also moved the troops off the border of Syria. His point being why should we have to pay for their war? Same war they have been fighting forever. Now I don't agree with him on that but you need to see the whole interview first. This is how the media tricks you. It ain't just troops. Everything cost money. Why should we help without being paid for it? So you want our troops to go out there and potentially die for a cause that has nothing to do with us and the country doesn't have to give up anything? That's basic capitalism.Now if your point is that he called that fake news then yeah he's wrong. I remember at one of the corona virus briefings he attacked a independent HK reporter because he thought she was a Chinese reporter. I agree he does that and he should be more selective there. But I don't have a problem with him making countries pay for our troops. Which the Saudi thing is to protect the oil we have over there. Bush/Obama etc. They all did that.
Now let's talk about your buddies at MSNBC. I wasn't going to do this and I'll still leave Gates out but I got some time. I'm a busy guy so simple stuff like this is tough to work in but I got time. https://youtu.be/kBGlUHxrN8Mhttps://youtu.be/jIbOBWjx0Hcdailycaller.com/.../Watch the video in that last one.
first of all-he's obsessed with Obama-it's no surprise that he would attack Obama-he has a crippling amount of envy towards him-it's tiresome-he does it just about every chance he gets . you might not, but you can bet the soldiers sure as hell do-most in the army hate him. let's be real-fox news lies and pushes conspiracies and propaganda.
and on that subject fox and covid-they've spent all this time downplaying things-less than 40% showed to even care about it.
Ohhhh the army hates Trump? Show me proof because I go shooting with soldiers and most are not only Trump lovers but Republicans (I'm not Republican). But I also got some proof. Here are some Navy Seals speaking highly on Trump:https://youtu.be/iau-_KRDwHAYou really don't want me to get into the Obama stuff. He's not envious of Obama. Obama did a lot of fucked up shit. Regardless of Trump. Forget Trump. Obama's foreign policy, the trafficking, fast and furious, Benghazi coverup. Ask those soldiers what they think of that. In fact one of the guys in the interview was there. He knows exactly what happened and that Clinton and Obama covered it up. But I'ma stop. I'ma stop with Obama. It takes too long to go through the list of crap he's done.Anyway, you mentioned COVID and you say it's been downplayed? Despite the doctors on YouTube saying it's being overplayed? Despite the CDC and WHO admitting they went overboard on their numbers? You don't want to go there either. Matter fact I got something just for you:
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/Check that right there out.
Sorry I had to re-read that lol. Sure most people don't care about NBC covering for a pedophile or that they have ties to China. It's funny you criticize Trump with Russia yet nobody else including the news company you love so much. Why? Sure most people don't care but shouldn't you? I told you they are bias too but again "They have never steered you wrong." Well if course they have. They have to or the things they are invested in with China go away.
*correction sexual sbuser
townhall.com/.../maskobsessed-nbc-reporter-forced-to-admit-on-live-tv-cameraman-not-wearing-mask-n2569483But MSNBC can be trusted right? Lol. Alright I'ma leave you alone. I'm beating a dead horse.
that an incredibly weak argument. that was just one reporter who worked there and instead of trying to edit it to make it seem like they were experiencing technological difficulties-as fox has done.
fox news saying that they can legally lie to people because they aren't really a news company.
I gave you two other things NBC has done. We're on three now. Lol. Want me to list them? Let's do it.1) They covered for Weinstein. A sexual predator who was known even before the public knew as a predator.2) Comcast is in partnership with China. Funny you are so gunho on collusion when NBC is doing their own form of it.3) YOU said NBC was taking the virus seriously. I'm just responding to that. So you saying some of their reporters can't be trusted? Alright then. My point exactly.4) We won't even go there with Bill GatesAlso, I don't have any allegiance to Fox. Fuck em. Idc. But they do expose the truth about CNN and NBC.