Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
And how do you feel about Biden thinking that black people have to have think a certain way in order to retain the right to call themselves black?
I mean the reason the riots started were political.
Considering this riot and riots over recent years jave started of left-wing ideology, no, we don't have to look for it, it's there in plain sight. BLM isn't new to riots and destruction.
Left-wing ideology. Ya know, you're right, the USA should never have freed the slaves. That darned Lincoln, what a screw-up lib-tard.
Lincoln was quite literally a Republican 🤨
So true. But his policies! Just like her emails!
Please enlighten me
google it.im curious if you think that any of them were right wing nut jobs..they usually are
How many people have they killed or harmed? How many stores have been broken into? How many items have been stolen? How many buildings have been burned? When you get back with me on those numbers, we can talk.
yeah, looters maybebut, let me ask ya somethingdont you thnk its a little suspicious that, the media tends to only pay attention to the carnage, than the actual silent protest.a president, who has said he'll answer violence with force (violence), and yet, the media only wants to pay attention to the "violence"don't you think that's a little bit, ironic?as if, it was set up, by trump himself
Firstly, no, protests are legal and non-violent. Secondly, responding to violence with violence is entirely warranted. Thirdly, did you seriously just try to blame trump for left-wingers rioting? What sort of conspiratorial nonsense is rhat?
i guarantee youit was a trump set upGUARAN FUCKING TEE ITalso no, violence, should not be met with violencethat defeats the very purpose of the protest in generalPOLICE BRUTALITYCOULD YOU BE ANY DUMBER YOU RIGHT WING PIECE OF SHIT
Can you actually explain to me how you can guarantee it? And yes, violence can be met with violence. And no, it doesn't defeat the purpose because there is no violence in a protest that can then be met with violence. The moment a protest becomes violent from the protesters, it's a riot and they are now rioters. If you want to argue about it, look up "riot definition" in Google, it'll tell you "a violent disturbance of peace by a crowd." And why did you randomly say police brutality? Do you think randomly pulling key words out of your rear end is going to somehow win you the argument?
Would you say the reason they're rioting is politically relevant?
Each individual person may have had their own reason but it’s pretty clear there isn’t any one unifying cause for the riots anymore.
That I can agree with, I think thugs are looking for excuses to be thugs.
Pretty much, when you see the opportunity to take what you want and fuck shit up with minimal chance of facing any consequences people will do exactly what they are doing. And the more people out there doing stupid shit the less chance of any individual being caught.
I'm still confident nearly everyone participating is left-wing. The origin is left-wing, and these all happen in left-wing areas (granted, it's apparently bled into some ring-wing areas).
Either way, I’m just gonna keep my security camera on, phone charged, mags loaded, and hope I don’t have to step out the door.
Good idea, best of luck