yea he was less radical in the primary... but he has swung left in the general
@007kingifrit When? In what way?
6 guys downvoted you for telling the truth.
@Agape93 it’s literally a quote and they downvoted you. Tough crowd.
They don’t like truth
@Agape93 Even if biden does not support the violence.. Harris does thepostmillennial.com/flashback-kamala-harris-encouraged-riots-promoted-bailing-out-antifa
Doesn’t matter in the least to me, honestly. If they can get rid of trump, they can kick a baby in the face for all I care.
@Agape93 that is hilarious
Lol glad you enjoyed it hon
@Cherokeehp That's G@G for ya.
@Ad_Quid_Orator Yup lolGotta love it
that's the trick though. biden didn't say who he was condemning... he was vague. vague implies he tacitly supports them
@007kingifrit Or that he doesn't want people to look into why people are rioting instead of just writing it off as a bunch of thugs.
And (contrary to what reactionary shits would claim) saying you can understand why normal people are driven to riot isn't saying that you support them or that they are justified; it's a call to drain the swamp because if enough gas bubbles out of it, it only takes one spark to ignite an inferno.
@Ad_Quid_Orator what is their reason for rioting? because as i have proven to you multiple times there is no such thing as systemic racism
@007kingifrit Yeah, no 'systemic racism':No greater likelihood to be convicted for the same crime and face a longer sentence for it even after all other factors are adjusted for:www.aclu.org/.../...parities_aclu_submission_0.pdfNo higher likelihood to afflicted with lead poisoning as a child leading to more violent behavior:No living with the impacts of Red lining keeping them in impoverished neighborhood:www.chicagofed.org/.../wp2017-12No vote blocking: www.theguardian.com/.../north-carolina-voter-id-law-blocked-discriminatoryRight -_-
Donald trump offered support to all the cities facing these riots. You know what all of these cities have in common? They're Democrat controlled cities in Democrat controlled states. The governors will not accept help and are willingly martering their populations to be able to say that they didn't accept help from trump.Words mean nothing; actions mean everything.
Accept help, like the “help” forced onto Portland? Anonymous federal soldiers kidnapping people off the street, beating/shooting rubber bullets at/tear gassing protestors? Yeah I would turn down that “help” too. You don’t put out a fire with gasoline.
@007kingifrit And as I explained already: those studies adjusted for all other factors. And as I mentioned, there are reasons black people commit more crimes like higher incidence of lead excess lead exposure. Right now blood levels in excess of 5 micrograms per liter are 2.5 times as common in black children than white ones but in the 1990s (when people who are young adults now would have been effected by it) the disparity was closer to 4:1. Remind me, how much more likely are black people to commit violent crimes?
@Agape93 yes, that help, because the mayor was endangering ALL of his city's residents. There are current calls for the mayor of Portland to step down from both sides.Do try to be informed in a topic before you try calling down to someone about it.
@Ad_Quid_Orator lol you can't blame an entire culture on lead exposure, its pathetic
@007kingifrit Yep because the correlation between culture and violent behavior is so much more solid than the one between lead exposure and aggressiveness:
Really, the mayor was? Considering trumps secret police gassed him too, on tv, while in the middle of a peaceful protest? Honey, I am informed. Maybe hop off twitter and Fox News and go educate yourself :)
@DeltaCharlieEcho I see you ran out of arguments so now you're just throwing out ad hominems like a pouting child.
Lmao yet you didn’t address my point, rather telling. Also, I won’t be having kids :) partial hysterectomy. Oh and also, reported.
Lmao he really is
And yet you keep replying
Reported @BeeNee @wankiam
Thanks :) not sure if you got to see it or not before it was removed
@Agape93 as much as i might disagree with you here... I saw that.. I hope he got banned.. Not just the comment removed..
I agree :/ I won’t hold my breath though. And it’s ok to disagree as long as those involved remain respectful.
@Agape93 Respectful? You mean like burning down building and killing people for voting a way differently from yourself? Because, newsflash, that's what happened Saturday IN PORTLAND.
@DeltaCharlieEcho newsflash thats what your country does all the time in other countries and i see the trumpers often condone that loss of life to innocent bystanders
@wankiam first of all, I live here and don't give a fuck about other countries, I give a fuck about myself and my home I suggest you do the same. Second, see point one. If you don't live here you have no idea how much misinformation you are being fed and you have no right to weigh in on this topic.
@DeltaCharlieEcho i know better than most americans whats going on becusae unlike you i can look in from the outside with an open mind away from hannity or cnn and away from the political tribalism you have all become victim to... oh yes its easy to say ''you aren't American so you dont know'' but the reality is you are the ones most likey to not beable to step back for a moment and take agood long look at yourselves... as for the not giving a fuck about others comment, yes i can see you dont but ah the irony in your conviction when you tell others off supposedly not caring about others...
He has every right to weigh in as anything that can affect American politics by extension affects his country.
@Agape93 thanks... ofcourse the further irony here is these same people want every other country to look up to america as land of the free etc but get upset when we sing the word land of the theives home of the slaves just because they can't see it themselves
Agreed. It’s the myth of American excellence, because realizing just how shitty it can be here makes them uncomfortable.
Riots and ongoing danger*
Considering you have a hard time grasping nuance, and you live here, I find that fucking hilarious lol you’re just a political partisan that can’t see shit past your own personal preferences.
Not to mention your constant complaints about women and minorities, yeaaahhhh get over yourself
Really, so you deny saying that being white can get you killed in the USA?
Oh also, reported
That’s hilarious 😂 I live in Maine. At least we both agree that the USA is a shithole
@Agape93 Oh, also, I don't care. I'm not some thin skinned female like you.
Lol I’m not the one constantly complaining about half the human population xD
@Agape93 Worse, you're spouting ignorance about topics you have less than no comprehension over. You get EXTREMELY biased information from just about every international news source that you are reading, just as we americans get extremely biased news about the rest of the world. It's the nature of the beast, but guess what, you don't see me getting into debates over social issues happening in the east where genocides are currently taking place of people in china because I can't affirm any level of accuracy nor do I care as it doesn't affect me. What nobody is telling you is that liberals are burning down cities here, it's not conservatives doing it. It is liberals claiming to be anarchists and they're just looting, rioting, killing, and burning. Hell, they went into the mayor of Portland's condo and set a fire in the building and attempted to block the doors. This is a hyper partisan extremist sect turning on someone in their ranks and attempting to kill another 177 people in the process. But where was the national coverage of that let alone international coverage? Where was the national coverage of the convicted felon illegally carrying a pistol in portland that shot and killed a man for being a white Trump voter? Where was the international outrage over that hate crime? Where's the international outrage over inner-racial killings of white on white or black on black murders? People are hanging flags, putting up signs, and painting murals in our cities and on businesses just to try to get around having their entire livelihood taken from them by rioters. There's an informational civil war going on that is shifting towards actual violent conflict that will erupt in cities creating localized battlegrounds.
Lmao coming from the one who is constantly shitting on half the human population, I find your nonsense hilarious. I’m not going to bother continuing to debate someone who thinks women are “inherently pathological liars” who can’t get shit done etc. so I’ll just report your sexist ass and watch your next thin skinned response. :)
Lol I can’t have kids xD
Aww blocked me? Lmao who’s the thin skinned one?
he can be both because he is sleepy BUT a vessel to be easily controlled by radicals
@007kingifrit He's not sleepy and he's certainly not controlled by anyone. That's a storyline you braindead fucktards have dreamed up to attack him. It's not real life. This is what happens when really stupid people (like you) start believing their own bullshit.
he is sleepy he can't speak straight or leave his basement, and he by his own admission is just a vessel for more radical people. he called himself a "transition candidate" he isn't even the real candidate, kamala would be the one in control
@007kingifrit More stupid garbage? Stop wasting my time with your stupid shit.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Read his policies then get back to me
@Rangers yeah he is right wing, maybe center-right.To be center left, you NEED to support universal healthcare. To be left wing, you NEED to talk about limiting privitization of industry. He is not left, he isn't even center... he's center-right.
Read his policies and stop using a ridiculous measurement. By your metrics, Adolf Hitler would be a moderate democrat
@Rangers Adolf Hitler was a strong capitalist, who was a literal fascist, or far right on the spectrum. To be center-left you NEED universal health care. Biden doesn't even have that, so he is at the very least center. If he is far left, you NEED a plan to nationalize industry. Not even Bernie is far left.. .
he is not in any way right wing
@007kingifrit he is against universal healthcare, which makes him center or center-right, not far right though. To be considered center-left you AT LEAST have to believe in universal healthcare as a human right.
you leftists just use the term fascism for no reason. because you are the fascists
@007kingifrit No, you're the poopy-head! do you even know what the word means?Definition of fascism1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism because wiktionary can be modified.* exalts nation, check* and race, check* centralized autocratic government, check (sending federal agents where they're not wanted)* dictatorial leader, check* forcible suppression of opposition, check (Lafayette Park)
any attempt to use formal definitions is just a distraction from the fact that you used it wrong
@007kingifrit Would you prefer "Cult of personality"?What's Trump's policy on health care? How has it changed from 2016? What steps has he taken to implement it in his first term?
trump's policy on healthcare is to reduce costs by preventing unfair business practices by hospitals and insurance companies, over the past 3 years he has:* made it illegal for hospitals to hide their prices * made it illegal for hospitals to charge different people different prices * made a law allowing terminally ill patients the right to try new medications * presided over the first drop in price of pharmaseuticals in over 50 years. a drop of 19% so yea... he's done a lot. nobody likes trump for his "personality" we like his policies
@007kingifrit They actually sound pretty good. Maybe, in the long term, some of them might help a significant number of people.* The hospitals' price lists are essentially unreadable.* I can't see anything about making it illegal for hospitals to charge different people different prices, but plenty about how insurance companies can and do negotiate significantly lower prices, so it seems unlikely that's a real thing.* The right to try law was fairly bipartisan, and has been used by fewer than ten people, not saving "hundreds of thousands" Trump was claiming. Turns out the drug companies don't want their treatments tried on too-ill people, because it looks bad when they die.* There hasn't been a 19% drop in pharmaceutical prices, despite what you might have been told.You might like what he's telling you he's doing, but it's "reality" TV, which is to say not real at all.People liked his promises about health insurance: "No one will lose coverage. There will be insurance for everybody. Healthcare will be a “lot less expensive” for everyone — the government, consumers, providers. "www.politico.com/.../trump-obamacare-promises-236021The only thing they came up with would have thrown 24 million people off insurance. And they're currently arguing in court that the ACA is unconstitutional, which would remove even more people's insurance.If he'd really come up with something that would have done those things, it would have passed in a day because he is a Republican president fulfilling a Democratic priority.
* hospital price lists don't need to be readable to the average person, just to watch groups and legal groups who are watchdogs on the issue. this creates price competition * we don't collect data on how many people have used the right to try bill. that's doctor patient confidentiality * drug prices did go down. your left wing media just lies about itand i have no problem removing people from health insurance if it is provided unfairly to them. healthcare isn't a right
@007kingifrit "* drug prices did go down. your left wing media just lies about it"lmao. Show me an honest media source that says they've gone down 19%. Or any significant amount for a majority of people. I might be willing to accept that Trump's really trying to keep prices down, he's just not very good at it (by the way, re-importing drugs is something Bernie's been pushing for for years).Here's the CPI for "Prescription drugs in U. S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted""and i have no problem removing people from health insurance if it is provided unfairly to them. healthcare isn't a right"And that's why Trump is going to destroy social security if he gets reelected, his base just don't care about other people.
your entire post adds so many modifiers its clear you already know you are wrong. you keep adding things like "oh well they didn't go down for a significant number of people" but they go down for everyone , you know you're wrong
@007kingifrit The modifiers are there in anticipation of you saying one medication used by 3 people a year went down in price by 19% proves you right. But I needn't have worried, you just lied, and said "they go down for everyone".Not even the White House and Breitbart are claiming 19%, and they're claiming a decrease from a projected increase, not an actual decrease at all.You like what Trump says he's doing, but what he says, and what actually happens, are completely different things. Of does everyone in the country have health insurance, even if they can't afford it, like he promised? Did Mexico pay for a wall, like he promised? Did he lock Hillary Clinton up, like he promised?
no they are literally dropping www.marketwatch.com/.../prescription-drug-prices-arent-rising-theyre-falling-for-the-first-time-in-47-years-2019-03-12
@007kingifrit Well, that says "the cost of prescription drugs over the past year have dropped by 1.2%." (year ending March 2019). Want to bet they didn't keep doing that?
they have kept doing that, and politifact is not trustworthy
@007kingifrit I'm not going to waste much time on what's an obviously incorrect claim, why don't you show me a trustworthy source that says prices have gone down 19%?
i've already shown you prices are down for the first time in 50 years. the semantic details and specifics don't matter to me beyond that
@007kingifrit No, you showed that they *were* down, in *one* month, 18 months ago, by 1%, not the 19% you claimed. But those are just specifics, I suppose.
That would indicate to me that he wanted them to occur and he didn't want to piss of any extremists.
@SuccessfulHornDog Wanted? I still say no. However... ignorant of just how far reaching the destruction has been (until just recently) because of the media downplaying the issue? Yes.
It would be truly sad if the guy that could be the next possible leader of the free world didn't actually know everything that was going on because CNN didn't cover it. I dont believe that is the case unless his handlers didn't tell him but either way I think it was an intentional decision on their part. The entire Democrat Party at the federal level was silent. It has to be intentional (in my mind) I think that it is backfiring on them now but they'll lie cheat and steal to make it look like they were doing the right thing the whole time
Um... Biden actually denounced the violence back in May. Even Fox News covered it. www.foxnews.com/.../biden-condemns-riots-over-george-floyd-death-calls-for-end-to-needless-destruction
@Starrk So, he said it twice? and the riots are nearing 90 straight days? Do you feel that as a leader and a presidential contender that he spoke out enough on the ongoing and worsening issue? I'm sure that if the roles were reversed and Trump made two comments over such a long time period that he would be accused of supporting the violence.
@SuccessfulHornDog Comparing Trump to Biden is a false equivalence because one is the President and the other is not. One (Trump) is responsible for the welfare of the country, the other is not. Biden gave his statement denouncing the violence and promoting peaceful protest. He did this when violence first erupted and again at the DNC. I see no reason why he should repeat himself hundreds of times. Also, Biden's VP is a former Attorney General so any claims that Biden would support these acts of violence are seriously reaching.
@Starrk True Biden is not presently President, but he is currently running in the hopes he is chosen by the voters to assume that position. With that said, I continue to fall in between your position on this and @SuccessfulHornDog 's position. He doesn't want, nor is he supporting, the riots... but as the final candidate for President running against Trump, he has not done enough in the public eye to denounce the ongoing riots. If what you posted is true, a statement at the end of May and one a full three months later at the end of August is simply not enough action.
@Starrk Evidence of violence is obvious to all. Chicago alone had half a trillion dollars in damage from this. That is only one democrat controlled city in three monthsAnyone and Everyone can be a leader. All it takes is a voice. The democrat candidate has been hiding instead of showing his ability to be that leader that the left claims we need now more than ever. You fail
@NYCQuestions1976Here are a few more instances of him denouncing the violence between May and August. Early Junewww.cnn.com/.../index.htmlLate Julynypost.com/.../And I'm sure he has taken to Twitter to denounce the violence, but I'm not going through that haystack of tweets just to locate them.
@SuccessfulHornDog I have no idea why you're trying to put this off on Biden when Trump is President and there are a collection of Governors, mayors and county officials with more authority to take action than Biden. Biden is simply a candidate who has spoken out against the violence multiple already. I honestly have no idea what more you want Biden to do with his non-existent power. Whether or not you believe Biden has done enough there is no question he had done more than Trump in trying to quell the violence, so that's one thing he has over Trump.
@Starrk That is silly. You equate leadership to his elected position and that is wrong.5% of the world/country are leaders. the rest are followers. that is just the way humans are. There is no excuse for anyone who aspires to the most important leadership job in the world to not be a leader before they are elected. To me it shows his level of interest or his lack of interest. I also think that he is being coached on what to say and he is just following it blindly instead of being a real leader and standing up for what is right.I support every Americans 1st amendment rights. I support the peaceful protestsI denounce violence against others as a means of protest. I denounce Antifa's instigation of BLM protests. I denounce all who try to paint all law enforcement as racist. I denounce those who wish to dismantle the police...How hard is it to make those statements and to openly engage others in a discussion about what is going on? How is he not concerned about the poor citizens of Chicago who have lost their jobs when thousands of businesses were burned and looted. How is he not concerned that the citizens of Chicago are unable to get prescription medicine because most of the pharmacies in certain areas were looted and burned. how can he be silent when the citizens of chicago can't purchase food and medicine locally any longer because the stores are gone AND MAY NEVER COME BACK. How can he be silent when violence and intimidation is being used against citizens walking down the street or sleeping in there houses. how can he not be concerned with people being yanked from their cars and attacks, maimed and killed because the mob didn't like them?How can he be president when he doesn't care about the impacts of the violence on innocent people?
@SuccessfulHornDog Yeah, I think you're just blindly ranting now because everything you said in that essay is either irrelevant or has already been discussed in my prior posts, and since I'm not in the mood to repeat myself, all I'm going to say is..."Go back and read it".Bye-bye now :)
@Starrk You clearly have no ability or facts to refute what I have said. That is why you're giving up
@Starrk Okay that's 3 statements in 3 months (the early June story was additional coverage on Biden's late May remarks). Regardless, considering the destruction, that's still not enough reaction. Oh well whatever. It is what it is...
Even if biden does not support the violence, Harris does..
Peaceful protests are our rights, not destroying buildings, taking people hostage or harming people for no reason whatsoever. Groupthink is illegal in many ways, change my mind...
Authentic protests sure, not ones that are orchestrated by big money.
he bailed out violent rioters and supports free healthcare for illegals... that's pretty extreme
@007kingifrit Yeah, no. It's really not.
anyone who says giving free healthcare to foreigners isn't radical... is a radical
@007kingifrit Nah man, we just understand how public health works.
promising healthcare to illegals isn't "how public health works" we aren't talking about emergency room care
@007kingifrit See, when you want to improve public health outcomes for an entire population - especially when it comes to infectious disease control but also for other things - you have to treat the entire population. Whether they're "illegal" or not. Otherwise it simply doesn't work. So yeah, offering healthcare to everybody is exactly how public health works.Then again I think if you were knowledgable about how things work in the world, you wouldn't be on about "illegals" and such.
i'm not worried about public health outcomes i'm worried about keeping illegals out. this is more important than stopping some inconsequential diseases. don't make excuses
@007kingifrit Right, we know folks like you aren't concerned about public health. That's why we have millions of people with the coronavirus right now. To be clear, I'm not making excuses. The people you call "illegals", I call "human beings" and if they get sick while they're in the United States, then American citizens run the risk of getting sick from them, too. Along with a whole host of other bad things that happen when you don't invest in public health. Aside from the fact that it's the right thing to do.You know, it's okay to just come out and say you don't want brown people here.
if you care about keeping americans from getting sick due to illegals just let me shoot them at the border and execute the kids. the terror will discourage all future illegal immigration and the problem will be solved =)
@007kingifrit Sorry dude, I'm pretty sure the NSDAP fell apart 75 years ago
I thought it was Sleepy Joe as Trump likes to say lol
@NorthwestRider I prefer Dementia Joe.
based on what? trump is the one trying to stop protests. did you just repeat whatever the far left media tells you to say
The left traffic children for Honey Trapping operations for espionage on other Leftist politicians and left wing supporters...Trump has been taking down those predator rings since he’s been in office including the VP of Dyncorp... one of the heads of the Elite DC Pedo Ring.
Didn't he get the military on them? If that's not violence, I don't know what is.
... are you not an American? that didn't happen
@007kingifrit I am an American, unfortunately. I'm Puerto Rican, so probably gonna become a state this year.And don't give me the crap about if you don't like it then leave, because the only reason I haven't left yet is that I'm getting my med school education at the cost of the government (full scholarship) then I'm out lol because I ain't being a doc for this country. Plus they charge for revoking citizenship, can you believe that? It's not a big amount, I think it's like $2,000, so nothing, but that kinda proves the points of those who revoke and also backfires on the govt. because they shouldn't be surprised when these people stay just to cause problems, whereas the smart thing to do would be to send them away. Lol that's the U. S. govt.
Trump is worth his salts so much that he is willing to forego payment for being President.
"Tucker Carlson, a show that exists to teach its viewers precisely three things: Property damage is violence, homicide is order, and pillows are for sale.”"
I’ve never watched ticker Carlson but if that’s your bag bb be my guest
You got to be kidding me... So these people harassing random citizens and attacking them isn't a violent protest?
@hellacray it’s a riot not a protest
If they're protesting while attacking people it's a violent protest.
@hellacray no it’s a riot when they start attacking people and property. No one should legitimize that by calling it protest
So just attacking and harassing people is riot? Ok so if a school bully is picking on another kid he's actually rioting?
@hellacray so the bully is supposed to be protesting? Lmao. WTH.
Well according to you any violent act is a riot.
@hellacray no that’s something you made up this is an uninteresting conversation. You bore me,
No.. that's what you're suggesting. Bottom line is violent protests exist.
@hellacray @scetoaux would you both stop? you both agree on everything except wordinga violent protest is a riot, they are synonyms
its both; they are not mutually exlucisvesleepy: because he isn't there mentally and low energy radical: because he is a vessel for radicals to use for personal agenda pushing BECAUSE he is sleepy
he wants to give free healthcare to illegals sooooooo no he's pretty radical
Biden is the guise of moderate/conservative Democrat yet his policies, VP and joint agreement with his and Clinton’s top contender - Bernie - show otherwise
he is quite radical, open borders, and free healthcare for illegals is pretty radical and he has gone out of his way to cover up for the rioters by giving bail money to themits not what he says... its what he does
Trump just pardoned a war criminals turned in by his brothers in arms who were stone cold killers, themselves, and commuted the sentence of (because the convict would have been forced to testify without 5th amendment protections, if he were pardoned) someone who didn't testify against him. And his "justice" department is fighting to free someone who pleaded guilty.
@goaded i'm gana stop you right there, i don't believe in war crimes. General Sherman once said it was unethical to remove cruelty from war because then wars would last forever. As an ethical peace loving man I fully support whatever cruelty needs to be done
@007kingifrit You don't believe in war crimes? We'll here are a few things for you to think about. The Geneva Convention believes in war crimes and violators can be brought to trial and imprisoned. But, who cares what the law is right? Let's just forget about that for a moment. Speaking practically, here's what happens when you become known as a country that supports whatever cruelty needs to be done. First of all, any of our soldiers who are captured by our enemies will now be subject to the same cruelty and suffering we are dishing out to theirs. Our brave men and woman in uniform will suffer torture and possibly death needlessly when if we didn't practice it, they would have likely been held in humane conditions. In addition, if we are known for whatever cruelty needs to be done, enemy soldiers who see they are defeated will instead of surrendering, if they know they will be treated humanely, will fight to the very last man never wanting to be taken prisoner because they know they will be tortured and killed. So instead of ending the battle quicker and taking them prisoner, we will have to fight longer and harder and suffer more serious casualties and deaths needlessly than we would have if they surrendered when they normally would have but chose not to do because we are known for cruelty and abuse of prisoners of war. You can't take something that was said about the way battles were fought in the 1860's and apply it out of context to war in 2020. It makes no sense.Honestly, I have to ask. You've responded to some of my comments and I see your responses to others as well. If there is a completely uninformed, ignorant and just flat out stupid response, you are almost guaranteed to give it. It's uncanny. I don't know what your life issues are or how you decided this was the ideal place to spread your abject stupidity, but for the betterment of mankind, please just stop.
@jakerson181 there is no such thing as international law. other countries are subject to it because they are weaker than us. we are the mighty American empire and can ignore it as we want. its a double standard built on might.and people would torture and kill us even if we did follow international law. it doesn't matter. only might keeps us safe from that. win at all costs
@007kingifrit Seriously dude, examine your life.
@jakerson181 hey man i understand, you have lived in the most peaceful time in history. you aren't used to understanding actual danger and you have morals and values that aren't really practicalwhen the real danger of the century sets in... you will adopt my values
You are "the real danger of the century".
@007kingifrit And what real danger have you faced? You're a 28 year old with a mental illness who probably spends his days playing violent video games and posting stupid shit on here. If you tell me you've served in combat and were held and tortured by ISIS or the Taliban before being released, or grew up in the inner city and were shot or beaten up by street gangs, at least I'd understand why you are the way you are, but short of that, what's your deal? You've clearly been brainwashed by Trump and his propagandists. What's the real danger of the century? Educate me.
You do realize radical is synonymous with revolutionary. Revolutions are quick sudden changes of government through force.
@Tslav_ some people realise that biden and trump are pretty much two sides of the same coin... ergo he is not radical... bernie might have been but biden is just more of the same
@wankiam Biden is the optics for the majority of Democrats that aren’t radical and also as gesture to indies and soft Republicans that he can win over. He is also old as dirt. In 2016 Dems and their media constantly attacked Bernie for his age. Biden will be 73/74 in office and 78after term 1. He is bound to succumb to health complications and either the 25th will be invoked or she will be sworn in
@Tslav_ so you now agree he isn't radical at all then? if anything he is the perfect fence sitter
@goaded Everything out of his mouth is a lie , why would I watch it?
It's a video of Biden, not Trump. You could watch it to inform yourself of what the opposition are really saying, instead of what people are telling you they're saying.
Liars don’t care
@Agape93 So we’re forced to vote between two liars, Biden and Trump.
Yeap. Question is, which one are we as a country better off with? I’m leaning to Biden. Heavily.
@Agape93 yep, I think any free thinking person would vote anti-trump. Then again, he may win.
Indeed he could, but not legitimately, and he knows it. That’s why he’s lying about mail in voting, having his appointee try to remove mail sorting machines to slow down the process and is already saying he couldn’t lose unless it was fraudulent. He knows he can’t win on merit and support.
“I love the poorly educated!”
Exactly, because they’re suckers.
trump never supported any violent protests
You do realize fascists use violence and destruction as a means of control, right? Antifa and BLM are overtly fascist organizations.
Definition of fascism1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition... No, that doesn't sound like president asshat at all now does it...
You're right, it doesn't. But selective comprehension it's a real bitch, so whatever.
Yes, i am right. It does.
your "definition" is used incorrectly. leftists always use defintions like this to change the subject and only selectively grasp parts of the definitionif you really understood fascism you would be able to sum it up in a sentence or less with no definition i your own words
if you actually understood fascism you could put it into your own words and give specific examples. you can't
@007kingifrit That's leftists for you.
Counterfeit elections, widespread corruption, widespread sexism, suppression of labor unions, uphold the power of corporations, limitations of the press, contempt of university and the arts, fixation on national security, over militarization...
that's just a long list of conspiracy theories and dramatic opinions, very little of it is true and what is true is highly dramatic and vague. not signs of fascismfor example what does "sexism" have to do with fascism? nothing, its just you being a whiney bratyour next attempt to call someone a fascist must be 1 example long and highly detailed, get specific or admit you lied
Sorry i couldnt fix your kind of stupid.
The waste of flesh, owns 4 business. I chose to work, i dont have too. I coild have retired 4 years ago @ 46 - without a college degree mind you and no inheritance.As for my mother, buddy she to has more intelligence then you mind could ever dream of swallowing - she too could retired early as well. Let alone, knows Trump and his supporters are the ones who swallow. Enjoy my load.
@michael1469 its sad you couldn't stay on topic. but you knew you lost. your list of accusations against trump was vague and most if not all wouldn't be fascist even if they were trueyou use fascist as a stand in for "i don't like this"
Funny, i used to admire the man, til he ran for president. Let's be real here. The world doesn't like him either. His party is turning against him, and even FauxNews is turning on him.
But lets face it, it was a loaded question on your part. Trump is not a great person and he is not making America great.
nobody is turning on him, his approval rating is up this week to 44% from its low in mayand you not liking him is not an excuse to call him a fascist, you can dislike him using normal non sensational language