Thank you for your response.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
... all about beating the other side. Everybody is so extreme, it’s really getting crazy. I think there are issues that can be pointed to on all sides that need to be cleaned the fuck up. But no one wants to admit fault, they want 100% blame on the other guys. I challenge a lot of people here, because I’m curious why they think how they do. And I do still see at the end of the day most people have good intentions for the ultimate result, there are just fundamental differences as to what the endgame is. The trigger happy 2A guys really want a peaceful world, they just have a violent or at least threatening route to it, but it’s all based on their perception of what the world around them is like. Some of those perceptions are wildly off base in my opinion, some problematic prejudices against certain demographics is no good, but that’s just another bough of the tree chart, it eventually finds its way to a perception of the world, albeit maybe misguided and incorrect. But the point is that, even if they think fucked up and incorrect things, they ultimately wish those things weren’t so, and the outcome would be peace. So there’s a glimmer of hope for almost everyone, as I see it. I just think there are so many people and our individual beliefs based on individual experiences only the “experiencee” can truly fathom, how do we ever coordinate that? So conflict is inevitable, and if that’s the case, maybe we all need to take about 50% off ‘er and just chill the fuck out about our shit. So as it relates to your question, that was just a 900 word way to say that it’s hard to even come to a universally agreeable definition of America, patriotism, liberalism, etc, lmao.
This is a terrible analogy. A Husband changing his wife's appearance and personality is not what's happening here. A better analogy would be a Husband who sees his wife engaging in questionable, maybe problematic behaviors and trying to change those behaviors for the better. According to your analogy, we should have kept segregation, slavery, miscegenation laws, child labor, Ford's Model T, and everything else that needed to be changed for the sake of keeping our American values. Newsflash buddy, every country lives and breathes on progression and evolving. America wouldn't be the country it is today had we kept things the way they were.
@Starrk No, your just a psycho leftist who is part of the problem. If you want to alter the entire society to its fundamental levels and alter the laws and remove the consitution, and change the culture and the people in all ways to fit what YOU think they should be, then you hate america. This is an accurate analogy your just getting pissy because its called you out on all of your bullshit (your a regressive leftist and probably a socialist, so being called out and shown for what you really are is the worse thing a person can do to you. Thats why you don't like what I said, because its the truth.).As for your completely idiotically stupid claims, no. Those were not changing america, that was holding to the American ideal "all men are created equal". we strove to reach that ideal and we accomplished it. Our ideal was that if you worked hard you could make something of yourself and no one would stand in your way, that was the ideal and we strove towards that. The left is doing none of those things. They are saying we have to judge people based upon race i. e. all men are not created equal. They are saying that the government has to come in and take from some and give to others and if you have what they deem to be "too much" they will knock you down, that is not the American ideal.
@Starrk I also find it hilarious that leftists always bring up all the twisted wrongs they commited in the past as an excuse for why they should be in charge now. Your a sick fuck and their is no saving you.I mean your claiming to be for progress right but you want to destroy capitalism, which is not only a proven system but the newest one, and replace it with mercantilism and socialism (both of which have been proven not to work and are significantly older. i. e. regress not progress). We moved away from identity politics and race based thinking and you want to bring that back i. e. regress not progress, you want to give the government all the power not unlike in monarchies i. e. regress not progress. The irony is you are pushing for all the things that failed hundreds if not thousands of years ago while claiming its progress and your to stupid to know any better.
What in the fresh hell did I just witness? Did you just have a psychotic break? You talk about how identity politics is a leftist thing, when you're the one talking about " leftist this, leftist that, Hey, you're a leftist, I hate leftist, leftist want to change America, You're a sick fuck". I mean you are seriously projecting your own behavior on to others and the sad part is that you don't even realize it.Also, I'm not a leftist, so there goes 99% of you rant down the toilet. Just because YOU disagree with someone does not make them a radical. That's a prime example of identity politics thinking at work as well as having a very black and white perspective of the world. So are there any more lies you would like to perpetuate today? as this recent post of yours was terrible, just like your analogy was (and still is).Come back when you get your emotions and your identity politics in check, but until then you can lay off my reply.
@Starrk Are you stupid?(Rhetorical question) Yeah I did mention leftists because its an ideological group. Just like how I would say christians believe x because christians believe x as its what would define them as christian. Your really bad at rationalizing.Also yes you are a leftist, you hold all of their views, make all of their arguments, believe all that they believe, that makes you a leftist. Its kind of like a guy saying they are not racist, they just believe that one race is superior to another, you can say it but its not going to be true.So yeah, again your really stupid and very bad at rationalizing, come back when your not an ignorant dipshit. Well not ignorant, that implies that your willing to think you just lack information, you have the information (I have provided it plus the information age and all), you just lack the capacity to think, so stupid, come back when your not a stupid dipshit.
There is no error in rationalizing on my part. However, you did expose the lack of on yours. Me calling you out on your usage of leftist was not me trying to say that leftists do not exist like you foolishly claim. Proper reading comprehension skills would have allowed you to deduce that. Your usage of the word "leftist" is rooted in identity politics because you use that word to describe anyone and everyone who views you do not agree with it. Labeling people as members of the radical section of an opposing party simply because there is a simple disagreement does not make that person a radical. If anything it shows how YOU have been consumed by extreme partisanship and can't tell the difference between reality and fiction."Also yes you are a leftist, you hold all of their views, make all of their arguments, believe all that they believe, that makes you a leftist."What you're really trying to say is... "Since you disagree with me, I'm going to engage in identity politics and call you terrible names like 'leftist' in a desperate attempt to shame you, because just like Trump, I see the world in black and white and can't fathom the possibility of there being an area of grey." It seems that all you want to do is just wallow away in your own cesspool of hatred, and quite frankly I don't have time for that, so I'm going to leave you to your own devices. Bye-bye.:)
@Starrk Sure thing princess. As we all know an assertion is the same thing as the truth, at least in your delusional mind, so thats good enough. How about you fuck off now because no one is falling for your idiocy (well maybe you, but no one with an IQ over 80 is falling for it).
This isn't my personal opinion, but just what I pick up from comments on videos and forums. I'm just the messenger. Whether my premise is right or wrong is not based on my own beliefs.
AOC literally calls herself a democratic socialist. So she must not know what she describes herself as according to you.
Eh, not really no. More that for some weird reason a lot of Americans in some new episode of McCarthyism seem to label things not even close to communism as communism. her economic views basically are the social democracy models in Scandinavia instead of full-blown socialism.
Ocasio-Cortez is a New York Democrat, self-described democratic socialist, and, at 29, the youngest woman ever elected to Congress.www.newsweek.com/ocasio-cortez-instagram-live-explains-socialism-aoc-1444534So yeah, really, yeah. She describes herself as a democratic socialist.
Ugh I know that. But her views do not even align with socialism. It’s far closer to just the social democracy, which is not socialism. It’s literally in the source you said. Read.
You made the statement she’s not even remotely socialist. She calls herself a socialist and you said I was incorrect. But then conceded she does self identify as one. So my reading was spot on.
Ugh have you ever considered that in contrast to you I don’t much care about labels but actual views about policies?If I call myself an asteroid but have the physiology of a human, am I an asteroid?
Oh, ok. So she’s just an idiot. I can buy that.
So America wasn’t founded by slave owners? People were racist back then because they thought it was right. Lol and when you colonize a country you are a colonizer.
Yeah but that's painting with a narrow brush. I can make anything look like shit if I leave out context and only mention negative things.
K great so do that.
Be the first girl to share an opinion and earn 1 more Xper point!