Extremist? The extremist just keeled over dead. Judge Barrett will be a refreshing change.
This entire post is nonsense, except for one word: The. Oops. There wasn't one.
All because you think the Natural Woman should fukk like a mink and then murder her unborn children. It's about infanticide, isn't it? It's not equal opportunity for women in the culture. It's about self centered action and taking a human life to avoid responsibility.
@Dargil I didn’t even mention abortion lol. But funny how ur view aligns best with other nations that we see as extremist I. e. Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc yet you claim you are not extremist for holding the same exact views
I didn’t even mention abortion**Perhaps not, but that is your only issue.
@Dargil no my issue is the interjection of extremist religious views into law. Because law should be secular. Don’t assume things ❤️
Like you pushing yours, of course 😆
I don’t push mine. I’m not forcing people to get abortions.
You're most definitely pushing your world view on others. Most definitely.
"She’s entitled to her religious beliefs but she’d be wise to keep those to herself and not push it on the people." Apparently, she must follow your intentions for her world view. Interesting point of view but that is the one you hold.
Yes. For example, we all knows she’s anti-choice. That’s her views, but it doesn’t have to be applied to others. If she participates in overturning Roe v Wade then she’s pushing that religious view on others.
The religious rights coming back and the Skeptic community can't do shit because they've been poisoned by the red pill.www.youtube.com/watch?v=eikMDiB3_Mg&t=1772sTime for the new left to rise!!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s2BLwkk7WI
Totally agree. Supreme Court is supposed to be secular. Appointing a religious extremist goes against a core American value which is the separation of church and state.
@MzAsh you do make me chuckle, you really do lol. "anti-choice. That’s her views, but it doesn’t have to be applied to others" the word choice is important as it is her choice to be pro-life and your choice to be pro-choice. Now if you're a nurse I'd agree leave your politics at home, if you are a politically appointed judge, you're paid to uphold such rights and freedoms. So, of course, she has the right to discuss such matters 😆Now could you kindly explain to me what makes her an extremist?
Like I said, she can be pro life all she wants but don’t make laws that force others to give birth when they want to choose abortion. That’s where we draw the line.
She is paid to implement law 😆 if you want a different outcome, get into politics and win an election lol.
Or I’ll just help empower women to do as they please anyway.
Like the judge ❤
The woman is the only authority of her pregnancy. No laws will ever change that.
@MzAsh Ginsberg was a devout Jew. What makes Judaism better than Catholicism?
I never said that it is.
You don't have to be religious to be pro life. Would an atheist pro life judge solve the problem your having?
That depends on if they were an advocate for overturning Roe v Wade. With Barrett, she's been linked with a notorious cultish religious group from my home state. So was Pence. I have a lot of reason to believe she’d use her power to impose her religious beliefs just as Mike Pence when he was our governor.
@MzAsh Fake news. She is not a part of a "cult". Wow, you just hate conservative women, don't you? So much for feminism.
I don’t hate conservatives. I have contempt for patterns of thinking and behavior that threaten the freedom of women, however. Mike Pence would have been fine had it left shit alone. But no, he had to get his fingers in everyone’s pie. He had a hand in shutting down the Planned Parenthood clinic I personally went to for years, among a dozen other things. We can’t keep letting this happen.
"We can't keep letting this happen". That's odd, conservatives said the same thing during the eight-year Obama abomination.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Had similar thoughts. A black conservative woman getting all the no votes from democrats would have been classic.
@DavidFox right! It would have been hilarious but also informative (well for those who don't already realize what they do (I swear they are the most racist people in the world with how they speak about minorities who don't toe the line).
@John_Doesnt Ahhh... the 1950's... a guy can dream.
@KrakenAttackin do you seriously dream of a time when white people ruled the world and women were basically sex slaves? You sick fvck
@John_Doesnt "when white people ruled the world". Wow that is quite a slam on every other race. I don't remember "white people" occupying and ruling over Asia or India? As far as women being "basically sex slaves", do you realize women as a whole were MUCH happier in the 50's than they are today? The "misery" index shows women at the lowest personal satisfaction in the recorded history of women.
@KrakenAttackin the ignorance is strong with this one. You don't remember the British ruling over China? You don't remember Gandhi? You don't realize that Russia is an Asian country with white people, the USSR tried to rule Asia and Europe? You aren't aware that Britain & France still rule parts of Africa? You don't remember segregation between whites and blacks? You don't remember Jim Crow Laws?
@John_Doesnt Not in 1950 slick.
@KrakenAttackin the 99 year lease on the British owning Hong Kong didn't end until 1998. Gandhi died in 1948 and the British still occupied India. British & France still own parts of Africa now. Are you retarded or just trolling?
I guess I am retarded. I am usually good with history, but slipped tonight. Fair enough, point for @John_Doesnt I still want to see ACB sitting on SCOTUS.
@KrakenAttackin yeah, women were happier in the 50s because their husbands would beat them if they said otherwise... just ask my grandma who's husband cheated on her, beat her and the children, then divorced her and no guy would touch her after that bc a divorced woman in the 50s was considered a slut... great times for females!
@Julietchicago Maybe your grandmother was a slut.
@KrakenAttackin so not only are you a total fucking retard who never cracked open a history book, but you're also a rapist. Most likely from some hick town
@Julietchicago Yeah that's me, mental midget rapist, or "MMR" for short. Tell me, what is your vision for the supreme court? You sound like a miserable cunt. I have to think you would be happier as a mother with a good man, as opposed to being a cunty feminist.
@Julietchicago he's obviously a troll at this point.
@John_Doesnt Not a troll, just a "sick fvck".
@John_Doesnt unfortunately, he's not a troll. He's def. An alt. right women hater if you read his comments on this site. He will argue civilly w men, but bash women if they disagree w him.@KrakenAttackin what should the court look like? Hmm probably justices that don't have the oppressive mindset that women need men to lead them like her occult believes.
@Julietchicago "Hater of women", well let's talk about you for a second. You are over 30, unmarried, and angry AF. Living the dream Juliet? Feeling "empowered" and "equal"? Frustrated that men only want to use you for sex? Want to know why? You have a pretty feminine exterior, but men quickly see it is a facade. Your false exterior is concealing a testosterone laden, angry feminist, who is furious at her own genders success at "having it all".
@KrakenAttackin lol you just made my point that you're a women hater. Any woman that disagrees w you is automatically an angry feminist
@Julietchicago I am holding up a mirror to you, I'm sorry you don't like what you see.
You mean infanticide rights. Gotta call things what they are.
Ahh name calling. An admission of defeat.
@Dargil yes @KrakenAttackin fabulous name-calling of cunt and slut shows he is defeated
You aren't aware that Britain & France still rule parts of Africa?**Which ones?
@Dargil more trolling I assume? Stop feeding this troll.
Ahh a Biden non-answer. Which ones? Chris Wallace is not here to protect you.
@NamerOfStars There are some Republican Cucks in the Senate such as Romney and Collins. I am sure Trump ran Judge Barrett passed these two idiots before nominating her.
Unless it's expressly forbidden in the constitution it's not unconstitutional.
@IlluminatiExposed it doesn’t have to be expressly forbidden; The federal government can only do the stuff that the constitution says it can do like raise taxes or regulate commerce. Anything else falls under the power of the states. For example, California could force you to buy healthcare insurance just like it forces you to buy car insurance, if you live in California.
Why you on anon?
@anon15 why are you called anon?
That’s short for my name. It’s pretty coward of you to say all of this shit and not even have the balls to at least show your profile
Why not @ Mishan and Jen below instead?
@anon15 I'll say it. SUCK IT UP LIBERALS.
That's bc there is a separation between church and state. It doesn't mean you are narrow minded bc you don't believe in something unconstitutional
@Julietchicago Uhh did you just make the argument that somebody being religious on the court is unconstitutional? Lulz
What I’m not even a liberal lol just saying she needs to grow balls And not hide behind the anon button
@Julietchicago You don't understand the "separation between Church and State". The intent is to prevent a "national church" from being established that would be intertwined with government. In times past Church officials could issue warrants, conduct trials, and condemn people. THIS is what the Founding Fathers sought to prevent (successfully). They did NOT want to prevent people from having religious beliefs and serving in government --- see the FIRST AMENDMANT.
@KrakenAttackin some folks get so buried in this they literally turn things upside down and backwards. She's making a supposed constitutional argument to discriminate against religious people. Lmao, so typical.
Yes, that's it.
Rofl So much for final wishes being granted
Just because she's a woman means nothing. The left will hire some guy to say he was raped in junior high by her or someone will say she made racial remarks. Thats their thing, their plans are always one or the other, they aren't that bright
I personally think fabricating a rape story in particular is less likely due to her sex. But I certainly agree with the general sentiment of your response.
Less likely? Are you joking. The left only has a few weapons they throw at every republican, and thats always number one besides being called the typical racist
I'm not joking. While I agree that it's one of several very dirty, immoral, and deceitful tactics that is frequently used against conservatives, Republicans, or otherwise right-wing individuals, I personally haven't seen any instances, at least that come to mind, of a Republican woman being accused of rape. I also think people are more inclined to believe or at least entertain the idea of a man raping a woman than a woman raping a man. I think it's more likely they'll accuse her of racism, or attack her religious views (which they may have already). You may be right, I'm just saying I personally don't think it's likely. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if you were right and a man did falsely come out and accuser of such. It's not something that I think is unrealistically beyond the scope of what some left-wing fanatics are willing to do, I just think it's a comparatively less viable and less efficient option.
There is already accusations, just read about them. Not about rape... yet
Yeah, it's a real shame.
@SuccessfulHornDog The left won't have much to throw at ACB as she was confirmed a couple of years ago and went through confirmation already. If the democrats had any sense (they don't) they would keep their powder dry for an issue they can effect.
@KrakenAttackin This is turning into a chess match. The republicans will schedule the hearings 1 week before the election and if the democrats attack her like they did to Kavanaugh then it will negatively impact them in the election. If they take it easy on her then they lose as well
To preface, I respect your opinion, but why do you want to get rid of gay marriage?
@crmoore: Its immoral. A man is suppose to marry a woman and vice versa.
What's the basis of that immorality? (I don't mean that in a confrontational or inplicative way, it's a genuine question)
@crmoore: Two d*&%$ don't mix. Its easy to figure that out as its simple biology.
That's true. Things like oil and water don't mix, but I wouldn't call it immoral when they come in contact. With all due respect,. biological incompatibility isn't, in my opinion, a clear example as to why something is immoral. Besides, it's lack of sufficient mixing is debatable. For reproductive purposes, it's entirely incompetent. But for anal, it's not. Make genitalia and the rectum fit decently well together. But if you still believe that two men don't mix, does that mean you would also consider a male partaking in anal sex with his female partner to also be immoral, as the "mixture" occuring between the two is more or less identical to a man doing the same thing with another man?
Male genitalia*Not "make genitalia"
@crmoore: A man having sex with a woman is natural. Gay sex isn't. No matter how you try slice it, gay sex is absolutely disgusting and unnatural.
Anal is unnatura, but you didn't seem to express disagreement in anal if it is a man and a womanl. There are many, many things that modern humans do that is unnatural.
@crmoore: Anal sex with a woman can't be unnatural because its sex with a woman. Same gender sexual activity is though. You wouldn't exist if your dad and mom was into having gay sex.
But it's not natural. Vaginal intercourse is natural. Anal sex is not natural. Like you said earlier, it's simple biology.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy you realise that neither of those subjects have anything to do with you.If don't want to have an abortion then don't get one.If you don't want a 🍆 up your bum then just say no. But if anal sex is something that you expect from a woman then maybe you should find out what it's like to be on the receiving end.
To play devil's advocate, @Goodwifie, you could use the same logic to say "if you don't want to murder someone, then don't murder someone, but don't make murder illegal for everyone else just because you don't like it." To clarify, I don't think homosexuality is a bad thing, it's nothing like murder. Nor do I think all abortion is murder, but I think some of it is (maybe mid-term abortions, definitely late-term abortions). But the point being, you don't have to actively partake in something to know (or think) it's wrong. I'm sure there are plenty of things that you think are wrong that you actively or passively oppose, of which you don't partake activity in.
@illuminatiexposed Should Ginsberg as a devout Jew have been disqualified?
@KrakenAttackin No, I have no beef with the Jews. Jesus was a Jew after all.
@illuminatiexposed So aside from Catholics, who else do you hate?
Why should a Catholic specifically be forbidden from any office?
@KrakenAttackin I don't hate anyone but Catholics aren't rational people.
Jesus was a Jew? Did Jesus tell you that lmao?
No sane person would said building a Kingdom of God lol
As someone who disagrees with religion, or in other words, someone without a conflicting bias, you're most certainly being exaggeratory or dramatic.
He’s always dramatic when it comes to religion and politics.
It seems so, lol.
Nor should extreme tree huggers
Nice and hateful you.
@Inbox not you.
Nor should atheists
You are not old enough to remember Waco.
@KrakenAttackin I saw the documentary
She's not Catholic, she's a member of a cult that calls themselves Catholic.
This wonderful woman truly does expose so much hate.
@DeltaCharlieEcho No buddy, this one matters. I danced a jig when I heard Ginsberg croaked.
@OddBeMe She believes both are rights. Owning a firearm is a defined right. Voting is a right. Committing VOTER FRAUD is not a right.
@KrakenAttackin how much voter fraud is committed per year?
@OddBeMe Let's start with Los Angeles county which has 120% voter registration. Voter fraud is huge.
@KrakenAttackin Despite parroting WH assertions, you forget registration isn’t voting. How much actual voting fraud is there? Hint: like.0001%...
@OddBeMe I saw a youtube ad for #BLM where half of the ad was pushing for #BLM activist to become POLL WORKERS. What could possibly be the intent behind this? Also, officials are already finding Trump votes in garbage cans and discarded by streams. Voter fraud is huge and the liberal noise/fraud machine is cranking up to full intensity as I type. Only a fool would deny this.
Anon. No actually the "donkey" (DNC) is being forced to suck Trumps balls. How's the view from down there?😂😂😂
Well since you went there... not only are trumps hands small he has to pay women for sex.
You realize she'd be working to take away any rights you have that RBG fought for women to have. If you want nothing more out of life then to be a housewife who ms husband is allowed to beat her then you are lost already at such a young age