You really believe all of that don’t you?
Well its not about belief, these are stated facts so. . . yeah. How you could think otherwise is a mystery. You will be proven wrong and your going to immediatley forget this quesiton and interaction because it will be most convient for you to do so. This is how people like yourself operate, you are not really about facts, logic or the truth, your about your ideological beliefs and getting what you want regardless of what you have to do to get it.
Well, when insane people call you insane, you take it as a compliment so thank you.
Yeah okay just gtfo before you get blocked.
Oh no what ever will I do. I'm sorry you can't handle some one disagreeing with you (and providing a reasoned argument to back it), have you tried putting your big boy pants on? If you can't handle some one disagreeing with you, in all likelihood your the one who is wrong. But what ever makes you feel better about yourself right?
Everything you’ve said is an assumption. Your pathos is all over the place.
No, not really. Assumptions are baseless, currently he has not done anything illegal and has followed every law and has provided actions indictating that he is not going to do what you are ASSUMING he will do (based upon no evidence on your part). So you are projecting (something the left does often, project what you do onto others that is).
Most presidents have started the conceding process. He refuses to relinquish power based on a few isolated incidents. Essentially asking the courts to throw away several million votes based on nothing. The man and his cult of followers have all lost their minds.
Yeah, most presidents didn't have the voting system radically changed at the last minute by an opposition party that routinely broke the law in order to try and oust the opposition president out of office, and then have an election riddled with illegal behavior (baring republican ballot watchers from doing their job), abnormal stats, votes that were not counted (almost every one of which were for trump based upon the few recounts they have done (thousands of votes)) etc. etc. That is like arguing that because all the presidents before lincoln were never assasinated that means Lincoln wasn't either. You can't claim that their should be the same response to two wildly different scenarios. IF this was like every other election you would have an argument, a shitty one since trump is only obeying the law, but you could have one. But thats the problem, nothing about this election was typical hence the legal battles over the states (all of which are within Trumps legal right to do so why would you be bitching and whining that he won't give up and let your guy win when the race isn't over (especially considering that you and the rest of the left refused to give trump the 2016 win (and had no problems with that) and when you have the left who was saying that under no circumstance should biden conceed if he loses the election but then are pissed off when Trump uses the legal system to fight what is clearly a very screwed up election? Its hypocritical.).That is the problem with the left, you don't have any consistency.
There’s no evidence to support there is mass voter fraud. His cases are being thrown out by the courts daily. If you take a look at what he’s suing for and the supporting evidence, he just doesn’t have a case. Meanwhile his own party members are asking him to give up and concede already.
“ That is like arguing that because all the presidents before lincoln were never assasinated that means Lincoln wasn't either. You can't claim that their should be the same response to two wildly different scenarios. ”That has to be the most nonsensical comparison I’ve seen today. I won’t say ever because I’ve seen quite a few stupid ones on this site.
Again, you keep saying mass voter fraud and again I keep stating that no one is arguing that mass voter fraud happened. I am saying selective voter fraud happened based upon the evidence we have. That is a fact, you trying to dodge this fact won't make it go away.As for my comparison, no its not nonsensical, it was an apt comparison because what you were saying was non sensical and I was simply trying to point that out. I can explain it to you, I cannot understand it for you.
Yes he is claiming mass voter fraud. Trump has used that same exact phrase several times. I'm tired of you, and your run on sentences. That are difficult and annoying to read.
He has used the phrase voter fraud. Fraud across the country (because their has been)). Don't recall him ever saying mass voter fraud. However it would be rather pointless if he did seeing as how you have already fully admitted that their was in fact fraud in this election and instead of saying how Trump was correct and we should investigate this your arguing that their was fraud and that is okay and we should not look into it and Trump is wrong because he didn't phrase it exactly so. Its a stupid argument no matter how you frame it.
according to Obama, but what if Trump is still considered command in chief?
Your question said, "what if Trump refuses to give up power" which implies that he would not be legally entitled to power. Now you say, "according to Obama". Well if you didn't want an opinion, it's strange you asked the question
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Only if the entire command and control structure of the military comes unraveled. Which isn't likely to happen.
What the hell are you exactly?
That doesn’t work on me buddy
What doesn’t work on you buddy? Are you black or what? I’m lost
Be the first girl to share an opinion and earn 1 more Xper point!