How much do you think the anti-BLM and "plandemic" positions many people are taking on this site is going to hurt them in the future?

Question

Right now, we look down on people who opposed the Civil Rights Act but given that back then, people didn't have access to social media so unless someone wrote something in a newspaper, who took what positions are just "here-say". But now that we live in the digital age, pretty much everything is on record so it's going to be hard to escape their past. So when their grandchildren want to know what position that they took on the fight against coronavirus and for socioeconomic equality, they could very well look at their social media/Q&A accounts and find out what they actually said so it could come back to haunt them big time.

Updates:

1 mo

Apparently owning up to their racism is way too much to ask of the Anti-BLM chuds.

Answer 1

BjornIronPeenus

Xper 5

The only people who have to worry about being looked at negatively are the BLM punks and their brain dead supporters. Anyone with half a brain knows BLM are socialist black supremacists. Good luck convincing the rest of the population that these people are fighting for equality. I've also noticed there's been a whole lot of talk among democrats like yourself trying to blacklist conservatives like a NKVD officer would do. You're only making things worse in this country by demonizing half the nation.

Ad_Quid_Orator

1 mo
Oh yeah, because some of them are socialists that makes them bad. Tell me does that make the Civil Rights Movement bad because MLK was a socialist?
BjornIronPeenus

1 mo
Yes it makes them bad, nothing good comes from socialism. I never have and never will dispute the civil rights movement. Stop comparing it to the modern day racists in BLM. You need to open your eyes and see the real ideas behind that movement. It supposedly started out as a anti police brutality group then a militant socialist group fueled by black supremacy. Put two and two together, George Floyd's death was the best thing that ever happened for BLM. They used that incident to fuel their agenda and convince millions of people that they're fighting for "justice."
Ad_Quid_Orator

1 mo
Actually, during the Civil Rights Movement, there were many people who embraced "Black Nationalism" or the creation of a separate "Negro Nation" which is way more extreme than anyone in BLM is proposing now. And, if you look at the historiography of the Civil Rights Movement, the greatest misconception is that it ended in 1968; it didn't. It was put on hiatus shortly after the second phase (that fighting for social and economic justice) began when it's leader was killed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xsbt3a7K-8&t=190s
BLM is a resumption of what was started 60+ years ago.
Show All Show Less
BjornIronPeenus

1 mo
Seriously, when you have BLM leaders calling white people subhuman and rioters telling white people to give them their homes that sounds like fighting for civil rights? Blacks already have the same rights as anyone else. What more do you want for them? They're never getting reparations so what else is there to give them? All BLM wants is a government handout which they don't deserve.
Ad_Quid_Orator

1 mo
And that's more extreme than calling for the creation of separate black and white nations? Give me a break.
BjornIronPeenus

1 mo
Uh yeah. I couldn't care less if black people wanted to have their own nation.
Ad_Quid_Orator

1 mo
Even if it was to include the state you lived in?

How much do you think the anti-BLM and "plandemic" positions many people are taking on this site is going to hurt them in the future?

AI Bot Choice

Most Helpful Guy

What Girls & Guys Said

Related myTakes