Okay thank you, I would read this book, I recommend you also the book of the philosopher Michel Serres, natural contract, I do not know if it has been translated into English, I fear in that the electric cars, solar panels, and wind turbine, need metals rare, therefore we only delocate pollution and become dependent on china
China is irrelevant.They are not the sole source for precious metals and, furthermore, where there's a will, there's a way to develop other technologies not reliant on precious metals.
The book has been translated into English:www.press.umich.edu/.../natural_contract
Sorry for m'y Bad English , ah great for the book, but China remains the country which has the most and it really does an unfair competition, you may be right but governments have got their technologies that they promote, it all smells like normal big industries that have found a new way to make a lot of money
Est-ce que vous êtes un homme ou une femme?
C'est nom: Jonathan...C'est un nom pour un homme...
Oui c est le nom de mon frère
Je comprends. Merci beaucoup.
yes but I do not believe in the end of the world is the oil it is not yet the end lol
Probably not. All of these other things will buy us time, but there is no alternative which is as efficient as oil, and we rely on it for most things. Let's pretend that I'm wrong and that we'll constantly have newer forms of energy and that they work just as good as oil, these things still cause great amounts of pollution. At some point there will then be massive food shortages since they destroy the local agriculture. Either way it's all fucked.
What law is that? The first law would disagree with you.
@ChefPapiChulo Good point. I shouldn’t have said “lost.” I meant that it is turned to heat (which is still energy) by friction.I’m surprised you said something without trying to insult me. Maybe I underestimated your intelligence.
@ChefPapiChulo there it is 🤣
interesting, but for me I don't believe in solar panels and wind turbines, in fact it also pollutes because of rare metals and we close our eyes to that, because it does not pollute at home so we prefer to close our eyes and there is a lot of money to be made
You’re right. Which part was interesting - where I misworded or the fact that this guy hates me? LolI’m kidding, he’ll get over it. Do you study ecology?
Did you just copy and paste that from a different reply
no I do not study ecology, but I am fighting the new religion of ecology, no I have copied this answer because as I am not very good in English it is difficult for me to express certain ideas correctly so it was easier to copied this answer that I had already made
Would be more genuine if you didn’t copy and paste.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
It's not the last and only hope of course. For now I see it like this: a 'harm' caused that is -say- 30% of what a greater harm does is already a gain: we buy time.To be totally consequent, we must go back to horse carts, candle light and sailing ships.Which then will cause OTHER problems.To make money from doing something that's 'good' for many (or everyone?) is not necessarily wrong. Where we can discuss if Mr. Musk is a good guy, of course.
So what do you think of the fact that in reality, with all its energy systems, electric car, solar panels, and wind turbines we are in reality only relocating pollution
Huh? What’s the pollution of solar or wind energy?
in their composition they are metals, and moreover China create an unfair competition, and after that we become dependent on China which is the country which has the most metals even if other countries have some.
So our only hope are depleting fossil fuels?
no, I think we have to be honest we are going to experience global warming, man will have to get used to it until better technologies are found.
(Slaps face) that’s what solar and wind technology is... and we’re already living through global warming.
All its technologies create pollution, their manufacture requires metals which create enormous pollution, not to mention the independence in China that it will create, of course large industrialists promote renewable energies because they earn a lot of money with that , environmentalists live in a world of don't want to see this truth
(Slaps face again) our industrial factories will produce pollution until clean energy is available. It becomes available by producing it in factories. So any technology manufactured will “pollute”. The question is whether we should invest in renewables now or when it’s too late.
Haha😂 You as long as the pollution is not at home you do not mind, it does not matter if we pollute a lot with these rare metals for the needs of its technologies, moreover recent studies say that the electric car pollutes almost as much as a car. thermal car, moreover you do not régle the dependence on China that it will create, and finally Germany which has invested a lot of money in wind turbines and solar panels were forced to reopen coal plants, they wanted to stop the nuclear and here they are, polluting more now lol😂
regular cars pollute so much less that they're nearly equal. get the wording right.
thermal cars pollute yes, but the arguments of environmentalists are to say that the electric car is a car that does not pollute which is a lie
Everything on earth “pollutes”. Cow farts affect the atmosphere. Maybe stop looking at surface level arguments.
Incredible but true, but for once I agree with you