Do you think the world will be a better if all people are rich?

[hellionthesagereborn]

No because all people are rich and we still bitch and complain. Statistically we are so far better off in the west and industrialized worlds, that KINGS lived shittier lives 100 years ago then the poor do today. But it doesn't matter because we don't compare our standing with what our parents whent through or our grandparents, we compare it to what others have right now (which is short sighted and stupid). So it will never be enough, you have a trillion dollars and others have four times as much and you will believe you are poor (we know this is true because again, we are living it. I mean according to US census data the average income was 5,600$ in 1960. Today its about 54,000$.).

[ohshee]

No there will always be GREED and if everyone was rich ,, well your still goingbto have people that are richer. And that is WHST is happening right now we don't own our county any more by 2050 we will be out of oil we are going through all of our natural resources and if the rich can get rid of the poor then they can live longer so let's look at it every one go home ,,, lose ur jobs you make no money then have know money then people start killing people for food so right now you should be making all the money you can make and every week by extra food so have just in case

[JosyJosy]

If everyone would be rich I feel like people would battle it out to have people on top and people at the bottom

[Quackthulu]

Wealth is only wealth when there is an imbalance of it.
https://youtu.be/fmSO2cz2ozQ

[Dongtai]

Money isn’t just for profit. It makes limited resources less likely to run out faster than they can be replaced. Do you remember how fast toilet paper ran out during the beginning of the pandemic? Imagine how fast things would run out if people could afford anything at any given time. We’d suck the planet dry within a decade.


I’m positive they’d just find something to replace the value of money. To answer your question. The world would become worse in the long run. Better for maybe a month or so. People would have to learn how to create their own things and harvest their own resources, which I imagine would cause a lot of competition and fighting over said resources unless everyone agreed on some sort of sharing.


The only way for a one for all society to thrive is if everyone treated one another like a neighbor. As long as their is greed, there will always be someone at the bottom.

[WesBrewer]

just like syndrome said "when everyone is super [rich], then no one will be super [rich]" if everyone is what you consider rich than we are all equal meaning we ar no longer rich, as well as the fact that prices would skyrocket because people can pay them.

[ibodi]

It is like to bet like sony philosophy that is against america's thought
but sony seem to be getting to be smaller. so their welfare is fail.
but the experience is still useful.
cause that reveal the root but sony's boss come from ww2. maybe can not solve japanese the problem that forget that time.

[WindAtMyBack]

In first world countries almost everyone is already rich. Even in a lot of third world countries people today are a heck of a lot better off than in the past.

Are affluent first world countries better off? Matter of opinion.

[Hogwheels]

Money is representedmy labor and resources. It wouldn't be possible for everyone to be rich because one person can only labor so much for so many resources and no one will labor the same amount. There will always be an imbalance.

[BCA6010]

If everyone is rich, then money loses its value or becomes worthless entirely. So no.

[locutus9999]

If all people are rich there will be no rich by default. I can reformulate your question, would the worl better if we get over the scarcity of goods? and my answer will be yes.

[winterfox10]

Nope. Because of everyone were rich, then nobody would be rich, because rich is a comparative term.

[boggboss]

Not how it would work if we was all rich nobody would be rich and the price off items would go up to hit the new norms for peoples incomes

[iFarted]

If everyone became "rich" then that'll mean no one is "rich".

[Jamie05rhs]

All people can't be rich. Because wealth is relative. It always has been and it always will be. If you give everyone more money, inflation will just devalue the value of their money.

[007kingifrit]

being rich is the act of having more than others. it is therefore axiomatically an impossible question

[DWornock]

Impossible. The poor will always be with us. Mark 14:7. I'm not one to promote the Bible but, in this case, I agree.

[Twalli]

Then nobody would be rich. Rich is a relative concept.

[strraku]

if everyone is rich than ultimately everyone will become poor

[Anonymous]

I’m rich. You people will never have what I have. The only hope you have is that I’m a liar.

[Snakeyes7]

Once everyones rich, no one will be.

[PeterCharie1991]

No cos money is the root of all evil

[OddBeMe]

can't happen. Simple game theory.

[Anonymous]

Then everyone will be equal.

[joeldalton]

If everyone is rich then no one is.

[GermanGuy87]

yesss

[DavidFox]

Nope

[Anonymous]

If everyone is rich, no one is rich.

[Dinosaursandanime65]

No. #{£{2>2>£

[Anonymous]

If everyone is rich then no one is rich.

[apimpnamedslickback]

That's impossible.

[harry7825]

Yes I think so