Process to put Harriet Tubman on a bill: Are you in favor or object to see the $20 bill changed to Harriet Tubman?
- I don't mind booting Jackson. He was a psychopath. As were those who voted for him. Now, Harriet Tubman on the bill is a bit of an insane stretch going the other way. At that rate, why not replace Franklin with George Washington Carver? Replace the man who helped modernize electricity, with the man who gave the world peanut butter?
I'm more concerned about Biden bombing Syrian children for shits and giggles, than I am about what face is on my $20 bills. We have a maniac warmonger in the White House again, after 4 years of relative peace. And THIS is what everyone wants to talk about?
CNN and C-SPAN refuse to hear questions regarding blatant fraud going on at some vaccine centers, and patients dying from faulty biological experiments that would be an insult to vaccines to refer to them as vaccines. Which it's screamed at us that they're "safe," yet, these screamers refuse to publish the animal trial test results - because there aren't any. They view you and me as the "animals"!
But, they are all too eager to answer questions about whether or not money will be spent by Biden to repaint Air Force One, to remove the Trump color scheme pattern, just to spite Trump.
This new regime is sickeningly demonic; and has some of the most f*ked up priorities ever. They even make the Obama years look sane!0|10|0Is this still revelant?
Most Helpful Guy
- Anonymous29 dFirst of all, the issues with Jackson’s character like many of the founding fathers who came before him were far more nuanced than the modern left will ever recognize, and Marxism by default is designed to drive societies into accepting these ignorant moral absolutes as a way to encourage groupthink that benefits a regime under the guise of tolerance. Most native tribes were not peaceful, they warred against and conquered each other, many of them also held slaves especially from conquered tribes, the US was doing the same things just on a greater and more societally evolved scale, it’s fucked up but it’s been going on since the beginning of history and still is outside the west. Need I remind people that the Indian Removal Act was not an unpopular piece of legislation, it passed quite easily in congress, and Jackson could easily be considered the first populist president. Ntm he was the most famous general since Washington, served in both houses of congress, and took many actions that benefited the common man over the elite political class. The whole thing is a slippery slope, right now it’s “just mean old Trail of Tears Jackson” being removed from the 20, next it will be slaveholding Washington removed from the 1, then it will be “white Christian racist Lincoln and Grant” from the 5 and 50. Hamilton is the only one who could be spared because the Left likes him despite him being loathed by practically all of the notable fathers besides Washington. As for the recommendation of FDR, and the claim that he was our best president, nah. I don’t distrust his intent but he expanded the federal government in many terrible ways, pretty much all of the disgusting bureaucratic overreach we deal with today can be traced back to FDR and also nobody is on the level of Washington and Lincoln, especially not FDR.0|10|0Is this still revelant?
Most Helpful Girls
- I am not opposed to this idea. My cat should go on the bill.0|30|1Is this still revelant?
- I dont care whos on the money long as i can spend it1|50|0Is this still revelant?
I dont even kmow whos on the bills and pennies. Injust know theyre white and gettin spent
- Show All Show Less
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!What Girls & Guys Said
224- FDR doesn’t even deserve monuments dedicated to him let alone his smug face on our currency. But I wouldn’t mind if the following people’s faces were put on our dollars.
- Daniel Inouye
- Barney Hajiro
- Audie Murphy
- Ronald Reagan
- JFK
- MLK
- Harriet Tubman
- John J Pershing
- Cesar Chavez
0|20|0 - was an American soldier and statesman who served as the seventh president of the United States from 1829 to 1837. Before being elected to the presidency, Jackson gained fame as a general in the United States Army and served in both houses of the U. S. Congress. An expansionist president, Jackson sought to advance the rights of the "common man" against a "corrupt aristocracy" and to preserve the Union.0|10|1
- I don't care if it is Harriet Tubman. They could make it Crazy Horse or Cesar Chavez.
I am just tired of seeing "White" men, just like they are the only contributors to American society. The fact is, many folks who fought for my rights and freedoms were neither "White" nor male.0|10|0Well, the reality is white men are the ones who built this nation to greatness.
The reality is that is a lie.
In your version of "greatness", I could be hung from a tree while being burned alive simply because of my voting choices.
So I guess it depends on what you think is "greatness".
The U. S. A is the greatest economic power and military force that has ever existed in world's history and its not even close.
- Show All Show Less
I am not sure what that is supposed to mean. If Hitler wasn't insane, most of us would be dead and the rest of us would be speaking German.
Look, I am not trying to tell you who to celebrate. You can celebrate insane crazed nazis, backwards fruitcake "White" supremacists, etc.
I am just saying in a free society, I get to choose not to celebrate folks who would string me up for my political choices and/or folks who would sit by silently while it was being done.
Besides, that road to being a military power again is littered by a whole lot of bodies that were neither "White" nor male. The first casualty of the Revolutionary War was a "Black" man. The Civil War had "Blacks" and American Indians fighting on both sides. WW2 had an all "Black" fighter squadron, "Black" infantrymen and American Indian codetalkers. Codetalkers literally turned the tide against the Japanese. We had Japanese-Americans serve despite their entire community being put in concentration camps. And women formed the backbone of the American industry that pumped out tanks, planes, and ships at a rate no nation could match.
So I ain't trying to spoil your joy.
Do you.
Many folks owe their freedoms and lives to other folks besides some rich "Whites" dudes. The funny thing is, no one owes a thing to Andrew Jackson.
What the hell is that about?
Screw Andrew Jackson. I just saying facts, not my opinion. If it wasn't for white men leading this country, America wouldn't be what it is today in terms of success and riches. Its reality no matter you slice it.
But it isn't reality.
I mean, you can pretend that is reality. I am not going to argue with you. You can have your fantasy. It is like neo-nazis claiming that Nazi Germany was this great place, while six million Jews were murdered.
I mean maybe it was great. . .
for the nazis. I am sure the Nazis thought it was awesome.
The Jews. . . well. . they didn't have it so well.
Just sayin;.
But yeah. . . Andrew Jackson. . . a guy noone can name a single worthwhile thing in terms of his legacy is replaced by a woman who literally risked her life to free slaves. Folks are whining over that.
I mean, it isn't like he was George Washington, a man who literally invented the Office of the President and lead troops during the Revolutionary War. Or Thomas Jefferson who wrote the entire Declaration of Independence and was a major contributor to writing the Constitution. Or even Hamilton who is basically responsible for the U. S having a strong central federal government and our first Secretary of the Treasury.
- I don't have a strong opinion on this but I don't necessarily agree with putting Tubman on the Bill. Putting her on is another racially motivated machination.
Tearing down our statues, Changing our currency and vilifying our forefathers is all part of the Marxist game plan. It is know as iconoclasm and it is meant to destroy a people's beliefs and allegiances to their country.
Iconoclasm literally means “image breaking” and refers to a recurring historical impulse to break or destroy images for religious or political reasons. For example, in ancient Egypt, the carved visages of some pharaohs were obliterated by their successors; during the French Revolution, images of kings were defaced.
Search for marxism and iconoclasm. They also do it to destroy religions0|10|0 - I say keep it the way it is. We as a nation must not forget the bad or good about our history, nor should we as present day individuals who had nothing to do with this back then directly feel obligated to change or feel the need to apologize.
If they go through with this, it will go to someone else like Lincoln, Washington, Grant, or Franklin and I would rather not see that for the sake of pandering or because of guilt of racism when there is none to be had.0|10|0 - This may come off wrong but she was not as influential as a whole on the united States as lincoln to replace him. But that's just my opinion.0|20|1
- Nope leave them dead white men on dollars.
Appreciate the lady if those stories are true.
But symbolism means nothing to me.
We need financial taningibles or Laws passed for crime and police.
It's a fucking piece of paper put yugiog cards on it for all I care0|10|0 - no opinion, not so sure of the criteria to be on currency or her fit in that. don't care so much. put her on the 1 million dollar bill.
I'd rather have aunt jemima or the fella that invented the cotton gin0|00|1 - I am against it because he is the first president to be elected 100% from the voters, we should put Harriet Tubman on a new bill, the 7 dollar bill.0|20|0
- It won't bother me - I'll just get tens and fifties from my bank.0|11|0
- Anonymous29 d
We're in the middle of a global pandemic, Biden wants to invite the whole world to come and join the homeless in America, Pelosi wants to have a trial to impeach a guy who's not in office. Burning buildings and killing people is considered "peaceful"
I don't recall the last time I touched paper money. Just don't have ANY fucking person on these bills. Just have some tulips on them and let's end this insanity.0|31|0A good deal of the insanity had already ended. Trump was voted out of office, by millions of votes.
You don't touch money because you are jobless, just like most deadbeats within the Trumptarded community :(
- Anonymous28 dI think women should be on EVERY bill... Because they spend all of our damn money!0|10|0
- I think that's a little bold, mainly because that's only for historical figures, I'd rather see Susan b anthony on it over pamala harris0|10|0
But then again, that's not historical and besides we have never had a vice presidents face on money before, at least to my humble knowledge 😅
- Anonymous29 dYes, I'm in favor or changing the $20 bill to Harriet Tubman. Jackson had no respect for the lives of Native Americans, and ignored the ruling of the supreme court. Those are not reasons to celebrate someone.0|10|0
- IMHO, there were more influential blacks than Tubman. I would like to see a more modern president, like Reagan or Kennedy.0|20|0
- Ironic that we finally get it when bills are going out of style. But ok.0|10|1
- Anonymous29 dnot interested in this big push to replace white people of history with other people based on skin color. I can smell the racism from here.0|10|0
- Yea? It’s going to end systemic racism!0|20|0
- just the right amount of pandering.0|30|1
- We need Reagan on the $200|20|1
- Fuck no, leave the 20 alone.0|20|0
- Anonymous29 dIndifferent, even Jackson said he was a Jack-Ass.0|10|0
- it's a good move.0|10|0
well its better than having jackson on there. im sure his face may trigger certain folks given his history.
- Show All Show Less
Related myTakes
Learn more
AI Bot Choice
Superb Opinion