
Mobile ID labs have been around for a long time. This isn't something new.


That would be more of a question to ask the US government that would be issuing these voter IDs.
Under the current plan, they don't have to show ANY documents. Even a Costco card would be better than our current plan.
Also, at least in my state, all you have to do to get a photo drivers license is to show a passport. It can be Russian or Chinese, and you'll get either a state photo ID or a driver's license if you pass the test.
Also, they will register you to vote right on the spot.
Well, someone who isn't a US citizen shouldn't be getting registered to vote. And there would be a large number of people getting a "vaccination ID" who wouldn't be US citizens. That's why the question of documents needs to be answered, as well as how the IDs will be issued, and by whom. We don't get vaccine ID from the DMV, and medical personnel don't issue driver's licenses or other government-issued IDs. Many people don't have passports (perhaps not even half of US citizens do). So I don't see how this plan would solve ID requirements for voting, and it could even result in a Voter ID being given to people who aren't supposed to have it.
I also don't see how having someone show a valid government picture ID to vote would constitute "voter suppression". A majority of blacks support requiring Voter ID, and the vast majority of blacks already have a driver's license, passport, or state-issued ID card.
It would be simpler to give a free ID to those who need it at the DMV, as long as they can prove their identity (e. g., birth certificate). They would need it in many areas of daily life anyway.
When was the last time you showed your birth certificate (and how did it prove you were that person)? If your name's on the voter roll, what's wrong with a utility bill, or similar?
All great points... let me go down the list.
1. Well, someone who isn't a US citizen shouldn't be getting registered to vote.
I agree. Tell that to Pelosi
2. And there would be a large number of people getting a "vaccination ID" who wouldn't be US citizens.
That depends on what you mean by "vaccination ID" As far as I know, anyone can get a vaccination, and after that you get a card and some type of credentials on an app.
My voter ID plan would have NOTHING to do with the vaccination; it's just that you would have to only go to one place instead of two.
3. That's why the question of documents needs to be answered, as well as how the IDs will be issued, and by whom.
I have no idea of what documentation is needed or who exactly would be issuing the voter ID's. But this is something that's being talked about constantly, so I imagine someone in government has a plan.
4. We don't get vaccine ID from the DMV, and medical personnel don't issue driver's licenses or other government-issued IDs.
Right. It would be two separate entities operating under the same roof for convenience of black people.
5. Many people don't have passports (perhaps not even half of US citizens do). So I don't see how this plan would solve ID requirements for voting, and it could even result in a Voter ID being given to people who aren't supposed to have it.
My example of using a passport to get a drivers license in my state was just an example of how things are so fucked up.
6. I also don't see how having someone show a valid government picture ID to vote would constitute "voter suppression". A majority of blacks support requiring Voter ID, and the vast majority of blacks already have a driver's license, passport, or state-issued ID card.
It's NOT voter suppression. Voter suppression is just an example of white Democrats making blacks look stupid and helpless, in order to achieve their goal.
7. It would be simpler to give a free ID to those who need it at the DMV, as long as they can prove their identity (e. g., birth certificate). They would need it in many areas of daily life anyway.
Free voter ID has been proposed for a long time, so the Dems moved their argument from the price tag of voter ID, to the transportation to get their voter ID.
So my proposal solves the problem. The vaccine and ID are both free, and you're already going there for the vaccine, so why not get both?
@goaded: You are not a US citizen, so it's rather strange that you're trying to involve yourself in a discussion about another country's voting procedures. This is something for US citizens to decide.
Interestingly, the UK is apparently introducing Voter ID this year.
You claim to be resident in Germany, so I thought I'd post this explanation of the process there;
www.bmi.bund.de/.../bundestag-elections-node.html
It should be mentioned that in Germany, EU citizens can vote in local and EU-level elections, but every German citizen resident in Germany is required to have a state-issued ID card and to be registered with their local city hall. When someone registers their address with city hall, they have to show a state-issued ID (passports for foreigners and a German state-issued ID for German citizens). The voting rolls are taken from this registration data, and you can still be asked to show ID at the polls.
Merely showing a utility bill is not a secure enough process when showing up at the polls in the US. That utility bill could have been stolen out of the mail or taken out of the trash, and it's got your name and address.
A birth certificate has to be shown in order to get an initial state-issued photo ID.
Incidentally, Democrats are known to transport many of their voters to the polls. Yet, strangely, they can't organize a trip to the DMV so their voters can get an ID they need in everyday life. Talk about using people...
So I can't have an opinion? The UK (right-wing) Conservative government is trying to introduce voter id for the first time in centuries of democracy at the moment, despite the pilot schemes finding that, in at least one area, they turned away more people than the margin of victory. In the 2018 elections, when over 7 million votes were cast, there were a total of 8 cases of voter impersonation, only one of which was acted on. At least the UK, like Germany, will ensure that everyone can get free ID locally.
I don't think they ever bothered checking my ID at my local polling place in Germany, they just saw the letter that tells me where my polling place is.
The asker's idea to bring registration/identification services to places where people will be anyway is a good one; if you're going to require photo id, you should make your very best effort to ensure that everyone entitled to vote should have one. Something like 80% of Americans like the idea, in general, but the implementation has to be fair.
(@Asker People getting registered to vote have to be US citizens, except for minor local elections like town dog catcher, and Democrats have never said anything differently.)
"The Dems are also good at busing Antifa from battle zone to battle zone" never happened. Rumours of it had towns turning out with guns, people setting up illegal roadblocks, and innocent families being harrassed, though.
"You constantly get busted in lies and gaslighting as you attempt to interfere with US elections."
Name once.
@goaded We had to show certified copies of birth certificates, social security cards, marriage license and/or divorce papers if your current name doesn't match your birth certificate, along with other documents to prove who we were and that we were married in order to obtain a REAL ID compliant drivers license (or state ID) which the government will be requiring for anyone wanting to fly or to enter a federal building and some other things.
Now if you do not want to jump through all the hoops, then the ID or drivers license will state "Not for Federal Identification" right under the card type. You won't get through TSA or into federal buildings though unless you have a up-to-date passport or military ID as an alternative.
Indeed. He's one of those European Marxists who think they always know better. His opinion is useless.
I do think getting everyone a state-issued ID is a great idea (free if necessary). But no doubt the Democrats will oppose that as well. It's ridiculous that people can register to vote without an ID and vote without one.
The antivax community wouldn't be allowed to vote, because they dont have vaccine cards.
It disenfranchises or takes away the right to vote of white people who refuse to get vaccinated. But the GOP seems to be more concerned to make sure black people can't vote, so i it would only be fair to have it happen to white people too.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!The solution is embarrassingly simple: if you can't get down to a Licensing Bureau, then take a taxi or a bus. Getting a photo id is really cheap, so cost isn't an issue.
There's been some confusion on what I'm suggesting. I'm not suggesting you need a vaccine to vote. If you got the vaccine, I guess you get a card to show that. And while you're already there, you could get your voter ID.
The original excuse for blacks not being able to get the ID was the cost. Then it was proposed that it would be free. So now the new excuse is that blacks can't travel to a place to get ID.
So my solution would be to get the ID while you're already at the Covid vaccine clinic.
But you're right, blacks don't like getting the vaccine, so I have no solution for that.
We don’t need national ID. We are a republic of states, and it should stay that way.
In my state you can get a state ID or driver's license from any passport in the world. They will also register you to vote on the spot.
I'm rarely in favor of big government, but do you really trust a blue state like mine to play by the rules?
I'm sure in California they would require you to pinky swear who you are. That's why I want a universally agreed upon NATIONAL ID.
I misinterpreted the second part. I though you were referencing a vaccine passport style thing in order to vote.
So the first part is still true, it doesn't suppress the vote.
But the second part in my opinion wouldn't be more efficient. They're two different things which I feel would bog down rollouts for both rather than help them. They're not hard to get, so such things should be entirely unnecessary anyway.
I don't see how it's meant to help both parties. I don't see how that would do anything to convince Democrats that wasn't suppressing the black vote.
The American colloquialism “liberal” doesn’t refer to people who believe in liberalism.
It refers to the tribal left and it’s the leftists who are the people who believe that it’s racist. The solution is that they should be ignored. Just implement effective voter ID and let them complain in vain.
No. This is sort of complicated to explain... and I could be wrong...
Generally, registering to vote is usually a solitary act not done in conjunction with anything else. Throughout history, many people have been leery of efforts to enhance voter registration with other events. Just as an example, in some states, you can register to vote when you are getting your driver's license, but there's been a lot of pushback against that.
But, besides all that, having an ID is generally not a requirement to vote. However, constitutionally, each state can establish its own rules for voter qualification subject to the voting-related amendments to the US Constitution such as the 26th Amendment which, 50 years ago, gave 18-year olds the right to vote everywhere in the US. So, if in 1970, the state of Pennsyltucky had a minimum voting age of 21, then, once the 26th Amendment went into effect by the 1972 election, Pennsyltucky would have been required to permit 18-year olds to vote.
But, surprisingly, Constitutionally, you don't even have to be a citizen to vote, let alone have an ID. It just so happens that every state requires voters to be American citizens. But not every state requires an ID. When I voted in NY, I just showed up and signed a book that had my name in it as a registered voter. It also had an image of my signature from either my voter registration or the last time I voted and the pollster would do a quick comparison.
Anyway, if a state requires a voter ID, your scheme MAY work, but things like registering to vote differ from state to state and may require different proofs of evidence for ID... not the sort of thing that one brings to an already crowded clinic that doesn't need employees from state to deal with voter registration as well.
You could have just removed the first part of your title. It'd have worked out just as well
Most Helpful Guys