No, again, I’d say if you can’t understand science then you shouldn’t be allowed to be a parent.Seems like we’ve been over this before…
Ok what does understanding science mean? Do we all have to have the same scientific consensus can we not read and come to our own conclusions. Like in the idea of climate change, do I think it’s real yeah I think it’s real. Do I think it’s worth destroying our entire economy over it no especially since plants seem to thrive with more CO2 in the atmosphere sure people are going to have to move from violent countries most of the fires in the Northwest are due to man and hurricanes are just as bad as they were 100 years ago we’re going through a cycle. Is man partially responsible for it probably but I doubt we have that much of that effect on climate change as the natural cycle of the earth has an affect on climate change. For example there was no ice at the polls during the jurassic period And things got huge. This is when redwoods evolved so I understand science perfectly fine don’t share a lot of the same conclusions as the ““ experts
No, scientific consensus. We’re ok with it for iPhones and heart transplants. But funnily its when it comes up against our politics…So no, we need standards.
Unfortunately you won’t get the standards nowadays. There “the scienceTM”. Like believing that a man can give birth then there science which actually does research. Unfortunately the left has caused a lot of people to loose trust in the scientific institution because of “the scienceTM”. Until we can get back to logic and reason and not let emotions and political correctness dictate what science truly is,
Don’t know what the science Tm is. But again, your smart phone, care and electricity are all in the science realm yet you’re fine with that.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Why is everyone saying that? I know they’re my political enemies but have an intelligent thought instead.
“Intelligent thoughts” are something you know nothing about.
Ooh, I see that being an “influencer” has nothing to do with intelligent thought.
You arguing just for the sake of arguing doesn’t make you look very intelligent.
Says the one falsely accusing I’m into eugenics
Advocating the idea that only a certain group of people based on a faulty scale of compatibility should be allowed to have offspring is textbook eugenics.
When the hell did I say they couldn’t have offspring? I just said they should be required to get licensed if they want to parent it.
Have trouble reading? Simple: not saying people can’t have offspring, moron.Just if you want to parent you take a fckin class.
That’s still eugenics cause if you fail the class you are prohibited from having offspring because you would be deemed unfit.
(Slaps face) it’s a parenting class. Not an offspring class. And like a drivers test, there’s a lot of support for idiots like you who would fail.But just having to take a course learning not to beat a child would be extremely useful.
You don’t really seem to understand the error in your idea do you? The class will obviously be designed to fail certain groups of people.People need to learn how to drivepeople don’t need to learn how to make a babyThere goes your logic.
Let’s not forget that you are the same guy that is okay with putting people who are right of the political spectrum in gulags. So there goes your credibility.
When did I say that?
On some old post where you said something along the lines of “definitely gulags” in regards to what should be done to conservatives.
Ahh, so you’re canceling me over a joke. How sjw of you.
I don’t boycott people over speech, that’s the SJW Modus operandi not mine. I’m just referencing what you said.
Exactly what SJWs do. But back to why you think I’m pro eugenics?
It’s self explanatory but for some reason you don’t seem to think that infringing on reproductive rights is Eugenics.
Demanding parents expecting parents to take a class isn’t infringing on reproduction rights.
Making it illegal to reproduce if you don’t take a class isn’t eugenics? Come on man, where is your common sense?
You don’t listen, do you. Not what I said.
“Intelligence test before allowed to give birth”Yeah totally not eugenics *sarcasm*
Well it’s off a news site. Insider I think. Don’t mean it couldn’t be.But isn’t that problem? We can’t figure out if right wingers are that stupid.
Is that the Dem party in the photo?
What’s eugenics in what I said?
“At least an intelligence test before giving birth” oh and who would administer that? The government? I wonder what sort of questions they’d pick XD absurd idea only a eugenicist would like
Like we admin drivers licenses.
Scum of the earth you are. Driving in the city is not a biological right, and they don’t test intelligence, only ability to recognize signs and drive. Terrible argument.
Didn’t say we stop people from giving birth. I said we force parents to pass a test.
Neither do I.
You know that’s right wingers in the photo right?
Yes. And that's stupid as long as it's not government over reach.Like, are they protesting their right to mutilate their children?
Essentially. They’re saying their rights over their children are absolute, in health, mutilation and death.
That's stupid and horrible!Like those folks with "trans 5yo", which is the equivalent of a vegan cat.But what they explicitly said?
The only difference is trans kids have a say.
Yeah, "5yo" have as much say in sex as well as trans kids, lol!Don't forget jews and muslims with their child mutilation as well. (and other cultures with similar rituals)
If my 5 yr old came up saying he thought he was a girl, I wouldn’t freak out. And when the puberty kicked in if she still felt that way we’d discuss meds with a doc.
Puberty kick in? Don't you mean after puberty settled?Have you seen the rates of desistance?What if your kid told you they were going to vote for trump? (jr, in this case)