Why isn't the Las Vegas shooting considered a terrorist attack?

Anonymous
I'm guessing he didn't meet the requirements of being an Arab or a Muslim? Is that why were not calling it a terrorist attack?
Updates:
+1 y
Governments definition of terrorism "Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C. F. R. Section 0.85)" that clearly says that this man is a terrorist.
+1 y
Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover ""domestic,"" as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act "dangerous to human life" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population...
This clearly defines the las vegas shooting. These are the sources from the government.
Why isn't the Las Vegas shooting considered a terrorist attack?
41
112
Add Opinion