I she would not have and sit. Her business is based on and propagate sby selfies. selfies she can only take bc of millions of dollars of surgery. She could certainly have worked hard if she were poor but no one would be looking at her and therefore she would have no business.
Made it. Not and sit.
@VIVANT that's generally what I think too. If she were an average girl without a famous family, I seriously doubt she would have a business right now.
Three no way. Not even bc she’s not particularly talented. Maybe she is. But her stuff sells based on her looks. Which she bought. Lol
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
She’s not self made at all
@KEC203 well she made her money but she was born in a rich family. So of course she has help. But like everyone tends to get helpJust even average people get help to buy houses. Maybe someone gives them 20k to start with. Very commonBut she marketed herself. No one did that for her. She was the face for her. She made her product line.
Bro most of it was handed to her
@KEC203 Most of it was handed to her?So her wealth of 900 million was handed to her? C’mon now. They didn’t even have that much wealth as a total family lolShe made all that. She’s the richest kardashian now
Kim Kardashian’s also billionaire but Kylie made history because she’s twenty
I’m saying most of the foundation was handed to her so no she’s not self made. She didn’t work hard and build from the ground up I’m saying the hardest part was done for her. And calling her self made is disrespectful to people who have actually worked hard to better themselves who didn’t have the millions given to them or the nice family name and reputation. So no she’s not self made now yes she’s worked and made it bigger than the other Kardashian’s but no she didn’t do all of it by herself
@KEC203 No! LolKim K is not a billionaire. Her net worth is around 359 million Kylie was obviously given what Shen needed. But her brand blew up within a coupleOf years to 800 mil and she’s close to 1 billion now. That’s just rhe market. That’s her. Her family didn’t give her anywhere near thatMost people get some help. Bank loans and what not.
No, that’s Kaitlyn, I believe. Kylie is I think the youngest or second youngest. Yeah, it gets confusing as to who’s who sometimes.
Um no she’s been handed money by her rich family. Which they got the money from slutty sextapes The only people who say yes are guys like you who thinks she’s hot
The American dream is real. Anyone can make it but nobody ever said everybody can.
You've fallen for the lie.Capitalism results in many working class people going totally broke, thousands every year. Meanwhile, literally no one goes from poverty to millionaire, let alone billionaire. Very few go from poor to six figure income and the possibility of a comfortable retirement. Look it up. It's a farce. It's the lie the wealthy and powerful tell the rest of us so we'll participate in a system designed to keep us broke or in debt while increasing their wealth.
Haha!I'm well past the starter pack stage. Clearly you haven't looked into the increasingly more common legislation that literally forces us to pay into capitalism. Look up "arrested for collecting rain water," and "forced to destroy eggs and milk" and follow the rabbit hole, friend. Every should have the right to participate in the system as much or as little as they wish. I see no problem with a guy who uses razors, but boycotts BP after the Gulf fiasco. I also see no problem with a guy who wants to move to the middle of nowhere and go fully off the grid, dig a well, grow his own food. You've chosen to boycott Nike because of their choice of Kaepernick as a spokesmodel. Does that mean you have to go full hippie to believe in something? I don't think so. Problem is, our government and the "evil" corporations disagree. They're literally outlawing self sufficiency in order to guarantee their market share and profitability. Don't take my word for it. Check it out yourself.
Arrested for collecting rainwater and drinking raw milk is extreme socialism at work.
You think being arrested for collecting rain water and being forced to destroy Co-op agricultural products is socialism? Please expound on that. I'm certain that neither side of those cases is socialist by any stretch of the imagination.
That's socialism and is done in places in the US with socialist local government. They want to control the means of production and ensure anything you earn yourself is taxed.
I've had local government in my face over a lot of different stuff from havin a us flag displaying, to growing vegetables in my back yard, to rearing karp, to having hens, to collecting rain water in barrels, to storing food, to owning a few surplus ww2 rifles, to my lawn not being cut properly. Always it's a liberal from the town hall.Take a look at this guy stacking wood wrong.www.offthegridnews.com/.../
Actually, that's fascism. Socialism is when the government collects resources and redistributes them as they see fit. People being arrested for collecting rain water and being forced to destroy Co-op agricultural products is a direct result of capitalism. Corporations lobby the government to legislate natural resources so that people are forced to buy their products rather than source them for themselves. Same of the co-ops. The capitalist pigs didn't like being undersold, so they made the local government change the laws to restrict sales of co-op goods. When the co-op takes donations and gives away their products instead, the sheriff shows up and makes them smash thousands of eggs and dump thousands of gallons of milk.
It's happening right here in the capitalist "democracy" of the United States of America, the country in which nearly 90% ofb the country fears and despises socialism, so there's no where in this country where non-democratic socialism is practiced, guaranteed. I defy you to produce evidence to the contrary. Meanwhile, everyone in this country benefits from socialism daily, but either don't understand that fact, or they live in willful ignorance.
Socialism is when the government collects resources and redistributes them as they see fit.That's why they don't want you collection rain water, they want the rain water to go into the water table. They also want to take the fruits of your labor leaving you with just enough so that you are essentially working for the state.Socialists have a bad history with co-operative farms as the green party and anarchists found out.Law enforcement shows up at the behest of local liberal governments quoting bullshit health regulations but the real reason is that people producing their own food, energy and clothing is not within their control, anything outside of their control must be stopped. Capitalists and republicans want you to prosper so they can tax the shit out of you and sell you consumer goods. Socialists and liberals want you totally reliant on big government and docile.People tend to starve under socialists.
Or Paris Hilton, for that matter!