not correct . most law clerks are white males .for example . even with the SCJ's . according to the National Law Journal ::::'The court’s 2016 law clerk class came closest to gender parity with 42 percent women clerks. This term, the court’s 38 law clerks 14 women 24 men—are 36 percent women.' but i'm not complaining ::::however in your mind . how many of those 14 female law clerks would you consider to be an over representation in that industry?
So what your saying is that despite gender equality law and most law students being female that women are unable to compete in the legal profession with men?
NO . i'm not say that . YOU are!
Equality means being responsible for your own failures.
tell that to the judge .
So kavanagh is actually helping women in law by giving them a start. Is that not good.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
That's fucking sick
But i dont know the context
@Intraluminalit is actually Amy Chua, a prominent Yale professor and a vocal supporter of Kavanaugh you are referring to Not Lee and not at Columbia U .
Thank you. Old age is setting in.
Actually, this has been acknowledged by a female law professor who is, oddly, in favor of his choice, and who "prepped" her daughter to be hired by him.
@Intraluminal I heard you was a rapist
@Intraluminal so you need to be in prison without a trial
@Rissyanne I'm just saying that Professor Lee at, I think it's Columbia University School of Law, instructs her students (female) in how to dress to be hired by Kavanaugh. I never said he was a rapist. Apparently you have trouble reading.
Being a nurse is nothing job, of no great importance, but as a nurse, I have to have a CORI (Criminal record check) and a SORI (sex record check) before I can be hired. You would think that, if there was any question about someone who will be sitting in judgement on the Supreme Court for the rest of his life, everyone would want him to have complete record check. But, I guess not.Besides, the Republicans already said that they were going to appoint Kavanaugh no matter what. So it doesn't matter if he's a rapist or not. Let him be investigated and then, even if he is a rapist, he can still be a Supreme Court Judge... apparently. Maybe he'll be more sympathetic to rapists, after all, they need love too... apparently. LOL!
@Intraluminal but this is what it’s about. You liberals want to send him to prison without any evidence. But you defended Bill Clinton
His predeliction for hiring his law clerks based on their appearance is well known, and this has been acknowledged by a female law professor who is, oddly, in favor of his choice, and who "prepped" her daughter to be hired by him.