take care (...)*
on the space (...)*
Nasa said they destroyed/don't even remember the technology to get back the moon and y'all think we going to mars? lol
We don’t need NASA we have private businesses such as Space X for example which do space travel and technology for cheaper and better.NASA is dead and is only sucking up resources by being government funded. It did good back in the 60s and we should thank the Nazi scientists for that
Thanks for the MHO. I am happy to see that there are concerned people here on earth ;-)
We can clean earth and visit other planets the same way you can run 2 applications inside a computer. Both take resources but the system can handle it, one does not stop the other from happening.Being concerned about earth is voting on the right politicians, living your life on a specific way, share knowledge, and help developing science and enginnering projects.It's not about closing activities outside earth.
No water because of the high co2 in atmosphere which causes green house effect to a massive extent. So average temperature is soo high that liquid water can't exist on surface
@Ultimate_Gohan You would have a better chance of survival in the Sahara Desert than on Mars.
That’s not true.There are areas that are -120 degrees and there are areas that are 100 degrees. Just like on earth.No plant is uniformly hot or cold
True, but SpaceX has a plan to build an atmosphere on mars to protect against solar radiation. Probably using ozone.
That's it. Done.
I can't tell if you're a troll or a retard
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
I wish I Coul fly around the skies of the gas giants. I wonder how pretty they might be...
Not quite, a Nuclear War would end a majority of human life and agriculture though
@Tslaveee : Point being, even if we were capable of conquering Mars effectively, we don't deserve to have it.
You picked the MHO to soon, lol.
Because moving any significant number of people between planets is practically impossible. e. g. Europeans colonising America didn't empty Europe.
Good point. We could ship a bunch of babies over though. Could stack them in an infirmary like setup with a couple nurses and doctors on board.
I'm guessing you don't have any children! 6-12 months is (literally) a lifetime for babies, they need a lot of looking after (and it still wouldn't save the people on Earth).
I don’t, :D. I knew what I wrote was ridiculous but it was the best comeback I could think of.
WoW! Thanks for the not so beneficial info.
I hope you don’t believe that man. I say this as a friendly voice.
I meant do you think MARS is the future planet for Humans?
I hope so too
What life? Is life determined by cells that can become life or is life as Democrats determine post birth organisms. Because if we believe in science then there are only 2 genders, life begins immediately once a zygote is formed.Can’t be muddying the waters.
Because we are destroying earth's ecosystem
So? Whatever the Earth's ecosystem is like, it's always preferable to Mars which has no ecosystem to speak of. There isn't even an atmosphere strong enough to breath. There is still nothing on Mars of value, so going there will always be 100% pointless. It's not a livable planet.
Stepping stone to what?
Further space travel and colonization. What else did you think?
But can't we save earth?
I feel earth is gonna get fucked up soon
In that case, Mars isn't the future, it's just next.
In order for future humans to ensure human survival, we need to leave our planet and spread out throughout the cosmos.
Because that’s my opinion