Have an opinion?
A Nazi who has done nothing except speak their nonsense? No. Violence should only be employed to counter violence. If I punched every person who spewed stupidity I'd never get out of prison.
absolutely! absolutely !!! punch, kick, slap, mace. i wouldn't shed a single tear
Nope, not unless it's self defence. You can't hit people for freedom of speech. Didn't vote in your pole though I don't fit into those categories
What the people who say that usually mean by "Nazi" is anybody who isn't a leftist.
Why I might call someone a Nazi. ↗Just FYI. I'm not planning on punching anyone who isn't physically attacking someone.
None of these options apply.Sure it’s okay to punch a nazi.The trouble is, they’re all but extinct.
Any comment on this?Why I might call someone a Nazi. ↗"It will not be because they are a member of a political party that went extinct in 1945."
Do you think it’s acceptable to punch people who think differently than you? And you’ve never even fucking met a nazi.
He thinks ever conservatives is a nazi
@Rissyanne What's your evidence for that?
Because you go at every conservative and scream at them.
@Rissyanne Because I argue with people doesn't mean I think that they're a Nazi. I have compared a few conservatives on here to Nazis but that's because said individuals advocated things like sending Trans people to concentration camps.
Then why the hell do you want to punch them?
@Rissyanne Who said want to punch them. This is a question asking people if it's OK to punch a Nazi, not a take arguing that it's OK to do so.
Why would you even think it’s ok to punch anyone for their beliefs? If you are asking this question then it must be on your mind and you’re thinking about punching someone. You are a hypocrite. You say conservatives are more violent than liberals. This proves that liberals are more violent
Bang... this is the same liberal that posted a question stating conservatives are more violent
@Rissyanne It is on my mind that some people think it's OK but that doesn't mean that I'm OK with it and even if I did, it still wouldn't mean that the left is more violent. Now you're really desperately clutching at straw LMAO.
You wouldn’t ask this question if you didn’t think it was ok.
@Rissyanne The same reason I ask any other question; so I can see what other people think on the topic. If I thought it was OK I would have made a mytake justifying it.
You are wanting to punch someone who doesn’t believe like you. That’s all
@Rissyanne No, you're just desperately clinging to the false pretense that the left is more violent than the right.
This question proves it.
@Rissyanne -Data proves whether the right or left is more violent-A take arguing that it is justified posted by me would prove that I'm Ok with it-The only thing this question (or your response to it) proves is that you're desperately clinging to your false narrative because you know that after the El Paso shooting, people aren't buying it anymore.
Meanwhile antifa attacked more people in Oregon today.
And conservatives try to equivocate punching people to killing them.
yes, we’ll just ignore it because it goes against your hypothesis. Wonderful plan.
No, you'll counter my hypothesis with evidence of a similar weight or make an ass of yourself.
Why? Because you’re stupidly moving goalposts? Not worth my time.
No, because fatalities caused by politically motivated violence weigh more into which side is more violent than punches. I didn't need to move that post anywhere.
Violence is not restricted to murders. The whole thread has been about violence. When I mention recent left-wing violence you go ‘YeAH BuT ThEy WeReNt KiLlEd”. That’s moving the goal posts.
Except I wasn't claiming that the left isn't responsible for any violence, I was claiming that the right is more violent so you were aiming for the wrong goal.
And the left is proving you wrong.
Not as much as the right has proved me right.
Bang him asking this question proves he is violent
@Rissyanne As I already explained to you a take justifying it would prove I support violence, not a question asking what other people think about it.
You want to punch someone who doesn’t agree with you and you want others to do the same thing.
@Rissyanne No, I'm asking other people if they think it's OK, I'm not saying I think it's OK. Are you so desperate to hold on to your false narrative?
Dude you posted it... now live with it. If I posted.. is it ok to punch a liberal. You would be whining about that
@Rissyanne I posted it but that doesn't mean anything and if you asked if it's OK to punch a liberal I wouldn't assume that you think it's OK.
That not withstanding that asking if it's OK to punch a liberal would hardly be analogous to this question. A more fitting analogy is whether or not it's OK to punch an Antifa member.
@Rissyanne Now saying that you don't care about minorities being targeted is a way better case for someone being OK with politically motivated violence than posting a question like this.
Actually the question should be... is it ok to punch someone with different opinions than mine. That’s what it boils down to.
@Rissyanne No it doesn't boil down to that because asking if it's OK to punch someone with extremist views isn't the same as asking if it's OK to punch anyone who disagrees with you (and me asking this doesn't mean that I'm OK with either).
I would call AOC an extremist
@Rissyanne Comparable to Nazis?
Yes she is
@Rissyanne And you say I've lost my mind LMAO. If she was a communist you might be able to make a case for her being as extreme as a Nazi but she (despite Trumps rhetoric) isn't.
She is nuts. She wants open borders... to get ride of cows and airplanes.
@Rissyanne Not wanting migrant children in detention facilities isn't the same as wanting open borders and she wants airlines to be replaced with high speed rails. BUT even if that were true how on Earth would that make her comparable to Nazis?
Because she wants to turn this country into a communist country
She is an extremist
@Rissyanne So I guess you think not wanting children in detention facilities is being an extremist. Good to know.
When Obama did this you weren’t whining. And you do realize a lot of these children are not being brought over by their parents. They are being brought over by traffickers.
@Rissyanne Because no where near as many children were put in detention facilities as under Trump and most are being brought over by their parents. But hey you would have the child punished for their parents transgression.
Idiot! Most of these kids are not brought by their parents. So you are ok when Obama did it. Hypocrite
@Rissyanne No I'm not and neither was he. these practices didn't start under Obama and he tried to curtail them BUT the president doesn't hold absolute power. Translation: they occurred in spite of Obama under his administration; not because of them.
You are so pathetic. You talk out of both sides of your mouth. If it is Obama... he doesn’t hold absolute power. But if is trump... he’s responsible for everything that is bad. You’re a piece of shit
@Rissyanne No, because Obama used what power he had to try to stop the practice while Trump uses his power to encourage it. It's not a double standard; it's just what happened imbecile.
In your mind. Obama has deported way more illegals than trump has shithead.
@Rissyanne Yeah idiot, he deported them instead of letting them linger in detention centers.
We need to make everyone happy in the US and release all the refugees and immigrants from the detention center. The US Army should escort them and provide living essentials as we march them up through the Canadian border. Canada has free healthcare, free education and legal weed. It's a much better country than the US.
Then the democrats would lose there voting base... lol. I think we should make a list if liberals and make each one of them take in at least 3 illegals into their home.
@Rissyanne But they care about the immigrants well being. You're not telling me that isn't the truth are you?
I don’t think they care.
@Rissyanne The reason isn't that Democrats would lose their voting base (what percentage of migrants do you think have committed voter fraud) it's because we would lose 6% of our work force with no means to replace it.
Dude it’s you democrats that don’t want people to have voter id’s.
@Rissyanne And you can only win elections with low voter turnout.
And here’s the soft bigotry of low expectations.
Or just realizing that certain groups have been disadvantaged by official policy and the impacts don't just go away.
They’re able to get government id for their government benefits. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=odB1wWPqSlE
That's anecdotal while a 2006 Brennan Center survey found that an estimated 21 million voting-age U. S. citizens didn’t have government-issued photo IDs. Of those 21 million, 15% of citizens who earned less than $35,000 a year, 18% age 65 or older, and 25% of African Americans didn’t have a current government-issued photo ID.
This video shows how liberals really thinkhttps://youtu.be/odB1wWPqSlE
@Rissyanne And a Brennan Center survey showed what's actually going on.
Liberals are the ones who are really racist
The Brennan survey says nothing about them being unable to get voter id’s. Just that they didn’t have them.
@Rissyanne No, we're just not stupid enough to pretend that the impacts of discrimination go away once you take it off the law books
We can speculate as to why this discrepancy exists is but the fact remains that voter ID laws do restrict voter turnout while there have been 31 cases of voter fraud per >billion votes casted over the course of 14 years. In short, the costs of voter ID laws outweigh the benefits.
And if you're going to use anecdotal evidence at least take it with a pinch of salt. For all you know the person who made that video could have met black people who did have issues with voter ID laws and just not included them in the final video.
You just can’t except defeat can you. It’s you liberals that want to keep black people down... on that Democratic plantation.
@Rissyanne Yeah, I can't accept defeat which is why I keep bringing up transsexuals to try to change the topic when my argument's been debunked, oh wait, that's you.
No you are the one always whining about conservatives
@Rissyanne No, I just show why their arguments are BS.
In your dreams
@Rissyanne And in reality (the two aren't mutually exclusive).
You are out of touch with reality
@Rissyanne I'm not the one who refuses to believe any data contradictory to their world view.
Yes you do
@Rissyanne Your assertions don't equal data. Sheesh you're full of yourself.
When someone shows you evidence you call it straw man or cherry picking.
@Rissyanne I do that when the evidence presented can't support the conclusion drawn, not that it's false because I don't believe it. Again, you're trying to pull a false equivalency.
Another one of your little sayings
@Rissyanne Because it's another one of your tactics that you use all the time.
Now you’re cherry picking
@Rissyanne I wasn't claiming that one use of a false equivalence meant that you do it all the time; there are plenty of other examples. You're just trying to use that criticism against me on account of your limited vocabulary.
You use that cherry picking and strawman when you don’t have an argument
@Rissyanne No, I accuse people of using them when they actually use it.
Just for having a differing opinion? No. For negative actions, then yes.
Being a liberal I knew the violence in you would come out.
No more so then anyone else
Nazis are traitors so yes
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.