They’re so focused on scrambling to the far left and socialism
Exactly!! A lot of Trump’s actions are questionable or unique but not illegal
Pretty much every day, Trump does something illegal. The Republicans cover it up. And the far right media lies for him. But he has gotten so bad that even Fox is beginning to admit he is doing illegal things.
He hasn’t done anything illegal. Right. Tell that to Robert Mueller and his 400 page report.
@AspiringArtist I would. The report said no collusion, and potential obstruction. People are innocent until proven guilty in this country and there was not enough evidence of any illegal activity to actually indict the President.
GigiMary, try again. The report did NOT say no collusion, nor did it say no obstruction. Mueller clearly stated his belief that he could not charge him with those things because of him being a sitting president, but laid out a lot of facts so that he could be charged after leaving office or he can be impeached. Nowhere did he say those illegal actions did not happen. Those were lies that the Trump group kept pushing, but you will not find that in his report, nor in anything he said.
@Red_Arrow you try again! The Dems couldn't impeach him over the report for a reason. Some of his staff and associates were indicted, but he himself was not. Therefore - no collusion on his part.On counts of obstruction Mueller was not willing to indict him, nor concretely say that he was guilty of it because he did not have enough evidence to do so, and in this country it is innocent until proven guilty. Therefore - no (or more accurately, potential) obstruction.
The Dems could have impeached him long ago, but because of the corruption of the Republican Senate that refuses to be loyal to the Constitution instead of the Orange Orangutan, they would not have voted him guilty of the impeachment. Both sides know that is the reason.I do not need to try again. You said the report said no collusion and it did NOT say that. You said the report said no obstruction and it did NOT say that. And in speaking to Congress after the report Mueller made it very clear that he did not exonerate Trump on either of those. So you were either grossly WRONG or grossly LYING.Some of his staff and associates did confess or were found guilty. Of acts that Trump participated in. Again, Mueller did not believe he could carry it farther with a sitting president, but did state facts that can be used later against Trump. And the latest crap he and Giuliana are pulling even has the Republican Senate agreeing to an investigation into their activities, which could lead to impeachment.
Ah but asking Ukraine to help trump in the 2020 election is a crime, hence the whistleblower complaint 🤗
@AspiringArtist I read the actual transcript of the call. Have you? He did not ask for help or favor in regards to the 2020 election. He mentioned in passing that they should look into Biden exactly once. That isn't pressing it and there was no quid pro quo as the aid was released before the Ukrainian Gov't ever knew it was being withheld and before the complaint was even filed.
"I read the actual [incomplete] transcript of the call." ftfy"He did not ask for help or favor in regards to the 2020 election."Except that's the election he might be facing Biden in, so it's implicit."He mentioned in passing that they should look into Biden exactly once." it was about a fifth of the conversation, and understood by the Ukrainiand to be a precondition for the call. How often should he mention an otherwise trivial Ukrainian criminal investigation for it to be important? "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?""there was no quid pro quo as the aid was released before the Ukrainian Gov't ever knew it was being withheld and before the complaint was even filed. "So what? They agreed to re-re-investigate before Trump had to threaten them. Trump used the power of his position to force a foreign country to give him something to help him win an election; that's illegal.
Hannity doesn't do news, he's on the propaganda side of Fox News. She only needs a simple majority of those present and voting. It's the Senate that runs the trial and needs two-thirds.
The way I see it is:Today, Boris Johnson (basically Trump UK) has had the worst case scanerio happen to him. Him shutting Parliament down was deemed illegal by the UK Supreme Court.This gives me hope, if this can happen in the UK- Trump can and will get impeached in the USA. Change is coming, and those of who support Trump on this website, it will be written in history that you supported a criminal president. ;)
For an idiot who supported an insane woman as a candidate, and a party full racists and liars, you're very quick to speak, dear.
@Guanfei I'm sorry remind me of these "racists" I support?
The democrats of course. The same people always speaking about how being white is bad, about how white people are bad and evil, about how being white is a shame, and advocating for a "diversity" excluding white people as a whole.
@Guanfei No, that's not what diversity means. You have been brainwashed by far right terrorist organisations. I'm not white, but I consider white people to be my people. I'm not black but I consider black people to be my people. I'm not every race in the world but I consider people of every race to be my people.Because let me tell you this. Let's take the race label away, and what are we all? We're human beings. And as far as I am concerned human beings are my people. I support very specific members of the Democratic party. And back in 2016, I did not support Hillary or Trump both were scum of the Earth.I support Bernie Sanders. I support Elizabeth Warren. I support AOC. I support Ilhan Omar. I support Rashida Talib. I support Ayanna Pressley. Those are the great people I support.Those people speak of nothing of what you say. You are being brainwashed by far right media most likely online media- online propaganda which makes you believe diversity doesn't mean inclusion of all and it scares you into believing that diversity means the extinction of white people.My college is arguably, one of the most diverse colleges in my city and white people attend my college. If anybody wants the extinction of white people or any race, then they are scum because people are people regardless of race.These people aren't those people though.
You support people who spoke against white people. Most candidate did, in fact, even the white candidate.We agree on one point, that's not what diversity means. But that's what dems are considering as diversity. And stop that bullshit about being "brainwashed" for a second, that's the rhetoric of a 10yo.What I said comes directly from dems candidates speeches.You just don't care because it doesn't concern you.
@Guanfei Okay. You have made a statement, now back it up with sufficient evidence- what have they said which is against white people?And what do you believe diversity means? Because I believe diversity means people coming together, of all different backgrounds, and celebrating our differences.And you might not like hearing it but it is true. And I actually pity you people. You are clueless as to how you have been brainwashed- the majority of you are.And yes, it does concern me- because if the UK leave the EU then we'll most likely trade with the USA.
It doesn’t bother you with what Biden did?
A tiny bit of evidence/perspectivehttps://qr.ae/TWstO6
@Grond21 - the quickest reply to the last sentence is to remind all of Treyvon Martin, an innocent man of color visiting someone in a gate community. George Zimmerman stalked him and called police. The police told him to back off, but he continued stalking then approached and threatened Martin. Martin protected himself and Zimmerman shot and killed him, but was found innocent at trial.
“Far right terrorist organizations”, yea right. No all Republicans are like that, there is a very small percentage that take things way too far. But on the far right side, yikes! The majority of the far left/anti-trump, not all far left, take it even further with all the violence, there is a vast a majority of videos that shows how mean, rude, violent the left is. At trump rallies, trump supporters getting attacked, punched, if we display anything that shows support for Trump we get attacked, far left are the violent ones. They are the most hateful, violent people on this earth. I’m not saying that all Democrats are like, just talking about the ones who take this wayyyyy too far. In every trump rally, or protest that I have seen on the news, far left are the ones that initiate the violence.
And the dems didn't do the same for obama cover it up everytime.
When Obama did the speech on Immigration nobody said anything, even the Democrats supported it, but when Trump took action, they all began to hate him.
@Red_Arrow yeah, that was the media narrative at the time, but the facts don't bear that out at all. Certainly some criticism can be leveled Zimmerman's way, but nothing like what he was accused of or what you just accused him of.
pelosi arse-licker you are an immature you child. Like Pelosi you got yourself duped, both of you have the IQ of around 60.
@Grond21 - The facts did, and do, support what I said. In 2015, two years after his acquittal, the media was still talking about that case, because of ongoing controversy. AND, since then, he has been involved in other violent acts.
@DavidGonzalez7 - "In every trump rally, or protest that I have seen on the news, far left are the ones that initiate the violence." Which only shows that you are watching the far right not-news stations. Watch the videos of those rallies and you will see Trump mocking everyone except his supporters. He has had protestors attacked, and even publicly offered to pay any court costs for people who would attack those who disagreed with him. One of the locations of violent actions is Portland, Oregon, where Far Right groups travel to with the purpose of causing violence with the people who live there.
@Red_Arrow See if this changes your perspective.https://qr.ae/TWsrUA
So CNN, NBC News, ABC News are far right? 🤔And as I said, the majority of far right are not extremists, however majority of far right are extremists as well, they are the ones that won’t even listen, respect other people’s opinions if they are against them. But yet there’s that very percentage of far left that are willing to listen, discuss (not screaming) and respect far right opinions.
@Grond21 - Nope. That is just another take that someone believed about the case. There were many differences in various accounts by various witnesses, and there were only two peoples present during the event who actually knew exactly what happened. Since Zimmerman killed Martin, the jury could only hear Zimmerman's side, in which he claimed he did not stalk Martine (even though he ended up at the same place) and that his shooting him was self defense. Neither account could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, so the jury had no choice but to find him "not guilty", which does not mean innocent.
@Red_Arrow assuming that's true, that neither account could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, why state that Trevon was innocent, that Zimmerman stalked him, that he approached Trevon or that Trevon was defending himself?
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Not passing on the whistle-blower's report was breaking the law. Until the report has been seen, no-one can make a judgement on what it says, but bear in mind, a Trump appointee decided it was significant enough to warrant sending to congress.
Remind me, how many of his "brilliant advisors" are in prison, right now?That prosecutor was corrupt (and getting rid of him wouldn't have got rid of any genuine investigations).
@goaded Well, 'brilliant' doesn't necessarily also mean 'morally-upright, legally-clean, and functionally-perfect', especially in describing humans. There were also brilliant con-artists, criminal-org masterminds, and assassins-for-hire, but their deeds will inevitably catch-up to them (either in this life or the next). If brilliance is your only criteria for hiring… such outcomes seem only inevitable, esp. in jurisdictions with a strong justice system.As for the Ukrainian prosecutor, this is Eastern Europe, which is known for corruption. (I've heard it's what 3rd-world nations would look like if the people were White & the climate temperate, though that may be an exaggeration.) With cultures of corruption, citizens can only hope the interests of the corruption are in line with the needs of the people, since eradicating it is almost impossible. Many times, the interests don't align that way. So an effective (not necessarily 'genuine') investigation would lean heavily on the internal-politics (though external manipulations will also inevitably come to play). While I've read somewhere (Now, I've been backtracking, though this would have been eliminated if I just saved the link, as I usually do when I find some interesting factoids.) that prosecutor this Vikor Shokin who formed a national anti-corruption board is skilled, I also did find allegations of corruption in Ukrainian news-media. (But then again, I don't know much about what's their C. N. N., Fox, etc.)With all the intricacies of Ukrainian politics, I'm just glad I'm not Ukrainian, so I have the luxury of x-ing tabs and being done with the matter, instead of having to deal with this personally. I can only wish they can fix their vast internal problems without any more external interference from Washington or Moscow, though I highly doubt it.
Fair enough lol I can respect that. My parents are the same way
TRUMP IS NOT A THE TYRANT So you rather have socialism and communism are that blind no more choice no free market you honestly think that is better WAKE UP AMERICA. ... 2020TRUMP2020
@BIGGESTD39No offense, do you even know a difference between socialism and communism?I think you have no clue.You say "wake up America" but support individual.Capitalism is an idea but what you have is classic imperialism where small group of modern kings rule majority of others under a patriotic masks.Free market is free only in your head, that is simply a lie , let me explain why, free market that you believe you have is a idea of a perfect competitive market, that means that whatever you are selling, so does the competition which means competitive prices, which means prices war, which means prices of everything is down, which means little or no profit... have you seen any prices going down lately?No!Truth is that businesses run from free market like from a plague, and that is the truth.If you had it for real, you'd be unemployed. I strongly recommend reading and learning more about everything around. We have finite planet, and "small kings" are spreading infinite without control, on the way they "kill" eachother and as their number reduce they start to make deals like " we will sell our products but first brand it , that way we'll sell same thing under different names without lowering the price an we'll call it free market"
Yes i know the difference and the left are wanting both if you don't see this than your blind wake up America 2020TRUMP2020
What political system do you support and where are you from?
I live in America we need to go back to what the founding fathers wanted and limit voting.On the federal level have it tie to if you paid over a $1000 of Federal income tax average of the last 4 years and how that $1000 tie to the rate of inflation as well. For the state and local level you have to own property there as your primary residence to be allowed to vote in those.There problem solved now only the people who are contribute Get a vote not just the parasites wanting free stuff and high taxes to pay for their free stuff.You have to remember over 40% of Americans don't even pay any federal income
That’s a very agreeable point of view similar to a Libertarian. I agree an income tax is stupid especially for the amount of illegals. A high sales tax like how my state has would be more beneficial
Do you realize there's more at 1 level my state has no income tax but there's the federal income tax that is actually only reason we have it is to pay back money the government borrowed to pay for social programs. A federal income taxes actually unconstitutional but they don't care about that they just want to buy votes. We need to go back to what the founding fathers wanted with Limited voting
Essentially yes you’re right. There needs to be a higher division of fed and state level
This all makes me heave a big sigh. I mean I KNOW it won't go anywhere and it just makes dems look foolish. It's not worth the trouble. Impeach... THEN you have to get him out of office. Impeaching is simply slap on wrist. Clinton was. He never left office. What's the point? It's too late anyway.
this guy has the joker bested.
Was t a whistle blower. It was hear say.
Look under Pelosi's dress and you will find a shriveled up penis.
Woot woot! I vote for this! ✊✊✊
Impeached for imposible offense exactly? Oh thats right, nothing on him. Thats why its continues to get dropped! Its sad and pathetic for dems to keep making up shit
I wish. Both of them can leave politics for all I care and at least one of them should enter prison.
Who made the transcript? There was someone who was around for Watergate who said they got given a transcript by Nixon, and it didn't match the tapes.
@goaded lol ok keep digging But what if? What if Trump is actually Obama using white face? Lmao.
Imagine Trump standing on the resolute desk , playing a big ole democrat shaped violin
It wasn't even a transcript, just contemporaneous notes, and they're reportedly damning.
@goaded you sound exactly like the media you listen to It’s a declassified transcript. That is about as damning as ordering a Big Mac at Wendy’s I’d love to replace Trump with another conservative but I fell for the hysteria on the Russian collusion story back after Trumps inauguration. Realized the dems don’t actually care about the truth of the matter So I’m very pragmatic You like music? I got one for yahttps://youtu.be/ebYoq8uPciI
Maybe you don't think it's damning because you don't know what the law says? Have a look at the Fox News video I posted in my opinion, and pay special attention to what Judge Napolitano says on the matter. What national interest would be served by an investigation into Biden's son?
Here's a later take on the subject by Fox News' expert, Judge Napolitano. He read it, he agrees that it was a crime.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs5FkaWbI8s
Lol ikr but I’m happy their doing it now to showcase their stupidity and loose all credibility moving forward into the 2020 election
Right it’s like they are ensuring his re election.
Trump knows it to so he’s jist sitting back baiting them further and further into the whole.
Ikr he’s the best troller there is 😂😂Just let them dig their own graveThey should’ve waited until closer to 2020 tbh
You gotta wonder..
Don’t work like that
It not going to happen he is 1 of the best presidents of time when are people going to see this y'all don't want the alternative wake up 2020TRUMP2020
Bill Clinton's crime had nothing to do with his ability to fill the post of the presidency.
I know. Billl Clinton wasn't removed because the Senate was majority Democrat. Same as Trump won't be removed because the Senate is controlled by Republicans
Actually, the Republicans held both houses, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/105th_Congress there were ten more Republican than Democratic senators. Some Republicans voted not guilty on both counts. (All the Democrats voted not guilty, but like I said, lying about sex is not a disqualification for office, whereas illegally attempting to compromise an election with the help of a foreign government certainly is.)An acquittal won't be as easy to justify to the voters, if there's clear evidence of criminality directly affecting the president's ability to do their job. Even Republican voters might start to notice that their party doesn't really care about law and order.
@goaded does it just require a simple majority in the Senate to convict or a 2/3 majority?I'm not from the USA by the way
Me, neither. It's two-thirds, or 67 votes in the senate. The difference is, back then, they'd have had a fair chance of getting 12 Democratic votes, if there was a relevant crime.
This is exactly what lord Cheeto stain wants them to do, he’s gonna use this as a marketing tool
Of course he will.
Wasent there an unanimous vote though? Sure this might not mean republicans will support this in the future but the fact that they sided against Trump this time does not look good for Trump.
Agreed. It will be a happy day when she kicks the bucket.
He already admitted to asking a foreign government to investigate his political rival. That's illegal, for a start.