by the way i dont see what this has to do with racism/BLM. I imagine the man called him the N word if anything. But i dont think this vid had anything to do with race on either end. Just looks like some idiot beating up someone old for a reason we won't know because it wasn't fully recorded. So maybe we should all just stop assuming. Or keep assuming.. whatever makes u happy sir
Okay yea this dudes clearly nuts 🤦♀️ I guess it was patients plural after all. I think he gets off to beating peepsmobile.twitter.com/.../1263395350523584512
Typical hood rat defending a black criminal piece of shit. In this case I wish the old man called him nig*er he certainly deserves such a title.
@RolandCuthbert this guy knows, though guns were pointed at the Ahmaud Aubrey in the cartoon, it was merely a conversation about his trespassing and suspicious behaviour
Also, the guys who were pointing the guns were former police and Arbery knew them as former police because he had had run ins with them before in that capacity and that's why they were able to recognize him, they KNEW this guy and they knew he was a burglar and thief and that he had a criminal record for stealing and for concealing weapons and for fleeing from police. They handled him exactly as you should handle someone who is armed, dangerous, and uncooperative.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
As long as those fully armed nazi flag wavers waves aren't beating up Jewish pensioners
@WarningWarning Well and I've seen dudes a lot bigger and stronger than him. One in particular I swear he looks like he's on steroids. And even he said he got his ass beat in there. Not for nothing like that but he made a mistake and got jumped.
@ThisIsMyOpinionIf a white policeman did the same to a black person, the video would be on continuous loop on all the usual liberal networks and every democrat in the US down to the local dog catcher would be demanding that every white policeman in America resign immediately.(OK that's a little bit of an exaggeration, but not much.)
@I-am-a-nobody I might be wrong about this, again I am not American, but the idea that we have here is that your news networks are really bias against the left or the right depending on what channel we are talking. To have the news controlled like that without getting actually valuable and reliable information must be frustrating.
@ThisIsMyOpinionIn reading the news, there's a lot of reading between the lines and interpolation to get the real story.
Is that why a mainstream media outlet reported this story?
@Ad_Quid_Orator If you base that on the video, notice how race was not brought up into this while race tends to be brought up much more when the victim (s) are racial minorities. The same goes with sexuality.
Do (or did they at the time) know it was racially motivated?
@Ad_Quid_Orator After watching the video, from what they say, I can't tell if it was racially motivated. That guy just looks deranged to me.
Ahmaud Aubrey was a violent thug who attacked and assaulted a man forcing that man to defend himself.
No son, the people who murdered him were "violent thugs". That's why the police finally arrested all three of them. Violent thugs commit violence. They kill without thinking, without regret, and without care. Aubrey killed no one.
The police arrested them due to a race baiting media witchunt and I'm sure they like the cop Michael brown assaulted or that Hispanic guy Zimmerman who was attacked by a black thug they will be exonerated.
No son, it is against the law to run down a man and kill him in cold-blood. In this country, that is illegal. No one trying to justify the beating of a "White" man in a retirement home based upon some earlier conduct in his life. Get some help before you hurt someone. . . or force them to hurt you. And no, they will not be exonerated. They will spend the rest of their lives in jail. I don't know why Zimmerman got off. I would say it was a very poor job by the DA's office.But Michael Brown? That was police brutality. Not many win cases of police brutality. And the funny thing is "White" people are victims too. But you are so racist, you would rather have police brutality as long as a few more "Black" people are victims.That's why we have situations like this. This "White" dude is literally begging for his life. And you are okay with it as long as some "Black" guy dies too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ooa7wOKHhg
In all three occasions violent thugs made the mistake of threatening the lives of men who were armed, grabbing for their firearms. It's not against the law to talk to a person you suspect of criminal conduct like Micheal brown who had just robbed a store, or Ahmaud Aubrey who had been trespassing looking for opportunities to rob or Trayvon Martin who had a criminal history of trespassing, robbery and drugs and was unknown to the neighborhood watch co-ordinator of the gated community and was uninformed of thug Trayvon Martin staying there.That video shows SWAT protecting themselves, he could have had a grenade or gun and refused to listen to instruction. Death by cop is a common suicide method.
No one threatened Zimmerman's life. He is a thug, wannabe cop, who took the law into his own hands. He had no right to follow Trayvon, much less murder him in cold blood. He is a child killer nothing more.MIchael Brown also did not threaten the officer. Though I agree with the finding. The police officer probably had no choice but to fire. He could not be certain of Brown's intentions. I thought you were talking of another case. I had to look Michael Brown up actually.And again the thugs who killed Aubrey will be found guilty. It is just a matter of how long they will be in jail. But this is far off your initial point. You compared these thugs murdering Aubrey to a "White" man being beaten by his "Black" caretaker. When you knew full well that the justice system will find this man and punish him to the fullest extent of the law.That method for spreading lies comes straight from Stormfront.
Zimmerman was an concerned citizen and member of the neighbourhood watch as a resident he had every right to enquire of thug Trayvon Martin what he was doing there, Trayvon Martin had no right attack him. I never compared the case of elderly old timers being beaten by their paid carer to 3 men who defended themselves against the violent thugs that attacked them.
Zimmerman is a thug, child killing freakazoid. And that is all to his story.He had no right to follow Trayvon. He was even instructed by 911 to stop following Trayvon. But he took the law into his own hands. And the only way Trayvon could have survived that night is if his parents had given him a gun. Then he could have used the "Stand Your Ground" defense. He could have killed Zimmerman and been praised as a concerned citizen defending his right to life. I mean, that's the point right. If Zimmerman was following him, he could have turned around, displayed his gun. Then if Zimmerman tries to pull his weapon, he could have shot him just like the old West. Right?He could have been a concerned citizen simply because he had a gun and was ready to shoot to take Zimmerman's life. And yes, you did. You implied the press did not care about the case, when the fact is the press would only be concerned if that "Black" man got off with some freak excuse like he was defending himself or some other nonsense. No one is supposed to care when the justice system functions normally. Only when it fails to dispense justice.Like I said, get some help before you hurt someone or force them to hurt you.
He had every right to follow Trayvon, it was Trayvon who instigated the violence.Police officer was doing his job questioning about a recent robbery. Trayvon Martin could only have legally shot Zimmerman provided Zimmerman attacked him which the opposite happened. Why a black man followed me to my car the other day I did not attack him and if I did he had the legal right to shoot me in self defence as he was carrying (I dropped my wallet, decent man). Bottom line is that if you assault someone or threaten their lives they have the legal right to stand their ground and shoot you regardless of race.
If he had every right, why would the 911 operator tell him not to? Zimmerman isn't a police officer. He has never been in law enforcement and he will never be in law enforcement. He had no right other than being an average citizen, the same as Trayvon. The only difference is he had a gun. So to even the odds, Trayvon needed one. And yes, Trayvon could have legally shot Zimmerman. He could have a gun, then he could turn around and face Zimmerman and say, "I am standing my ground. If you come any further, I will kill you."Thank you for that agreement. Young "Black" men have to know, crazy "White" supremacists will kill them, kill their mother, father, sisters and brothers, then claim it was the only rational thing they could do.So instead of whipping their ass like a man would do. These young men will have to get legal permits and carry. Then shoot they have to shoot crazy racists just to be left alone to walk the streets like any other free American.
doesn't matter, Zimmerman is free to walk where he wants and can't be attacked.
Make logic son. Zimmerman admitted he was freely walking. He was looking to confront Trayvon because he believed Trayvon did not belong there. So the only precaution that makes sense is for young "Black" men to be strapped in case someone like you thinks they have the right to question their freedom to walk where they please.
You can confront a person with words but when someone attacks you then it's time to confront that aggression with lead.
Right. If Trayvon had a gun, he would never had needed to confront Zimmerman and put a whupping on him. He could have just turned around and made the statement, "I am armed and I am standing my ground". Then Zimmerman could decide if he wanted to live or not.I don't know why you are arguing at this point. It seems like a great ad for the NRA.
If Travyon had shot Zimmerman that would have been murder as Zimmerman wasn't attacking him nor was his gun drawn. Armed or not when Trayvon attacked Zimmerman, Zimmerman had the right to shoot in self defense.Self defense and stand your ground is very simple, you attack somebody with a gun or with your fists they've the right to shoot you in self defense. Most people get this except for a minority section of the population that keeps getting themselves shot.
It wouldn't be murder. Zimmerman is a coward. He would never have tried to fight Trayvon. And Trayvon has every right, every citizen has. He can stand his ground. His walk through that neighborhood was legal. So Zimmerman would have to choose to escalate the confrontation or leave. And if he escalated, Trayvon has every right to defend himself. So seeing that Zimmerman is not really a man. I think he would try to go for his gun. Trayvon could just drill him at that point.
Zimmerman isn't a coward, he kept tabs on a violent thug. Trayvon had the right to stand his ground but opted to violently attack Zimmerman and paid the price for his thuggery. Zimmerman didn't escalate anything, Trayvon did that by attacking Zimmerman. Stand your ground works only when attacked, if Trayvon hadn't attacked Zimmerman the police would have arrived and Trayvon would have to answer as a non resident of the gated community the legitimate question as to who he was and what he was doing snooping around but Trayvon choose to commit the crime of assault.
Yes, he is a coward. He got his ass whupped by a child. So he shot him. Now I am saying that child simply has to have a gun. Then the odds would be even. Zimmerman, being the coward he is, would never had tried to engage hand to hand combat. Cowards never do. He would have been carrying his weapon. And Trayvon could just announce he was standing his ground and get ready. With proper training, he could drill Zimmerman before Zimmerman pulls his weapon. It is pretty simple. That way Trayvon can ensure his right to go where he pleases without being disturbed or bothered by insane fruitcake racists. And it is something Aubrey needed also. He needed a weapon. Then he could have been perfectly right to stand his ground when he was being chased. He could turn, say I am armed and standing my ground. And those dudes could decide was it worth dying for.
So you admit Trayvon Martin was a violent thug that needed put down? Stand your ground laws exist for this reason.Trayvon Martin was the racist coward for assaulting some fat over weight Hispanic, that's what cowards do, they attack those weaker than themselves.No because again Zimmerman drew his weapon after being attacked, remember Trayvon Martin is the attacker weapon or not. It's not standing your ground if you attack another person. Aubrey too was the violent aggressor, stand your ground doesn't give you the right to gun somebody down but does give you the right to protect yourself against rascist thugs like aubrey and Trayvon who attack you.
How am I admitting to that? He was child who needed a gun and training. Just so he could live here in America. That way you could have been here whining about Zimmerman, rather than bragging about the loss of someone's life. I dislike racism and racists. But even I would not celebrate Zimmerman's death. I am certain had Trayvon had a gun, he would be alive. Zimmerman is too much of a coward to approach someone when the odds are even. He couldn't even take the ass whupping for stalking Trayvon.Haha!!! It isn't Trayvon's fault that Zimmerman is fat and overweight. Zimmerman needs some personal accountability and needs to get his fat ass to the gym and work out. "Black" people owe him nothing.He was told to stop following Trayvon and to not force a confrontation. The only way that coward was going to leave Trayvon alone was if Trayvon showed him a weapon. That's it. That's all.And your testimony here proves it. Racists think they can question and approach "Black" people just because they are "Black". And the only way we can ensure we can travel around this nation without being bothered is if we show racists that we are prepared to defend ourselves. Racism? That crap you believe in is a trip.
If Trayvon had not attacked Zimmerman he would still be alive.Your testimony here is that racist black men feel they are immune to laws and cannot be questioned by a white person when acting suspiciously in a neighbourhood they dont live in simply because of skin color is ridiculous. This is why there are neighborhood watch schemes m, in white neighborhoods neighbor's watch out for each other, their kids and report any crimes or unknown thugs acting suspiciously which is why crime us lower in white neighborhoods compared to black neighborhoods. Its called community.
No he wouldn't. Zimmerman is a coward and likely would have shot him. Trayvon was a kid. And he might have taken off and tried to run. I mean, what else would you do if someone is stalking you. Zimmerman is not a police officer. He is a wannabe.But if he had a gun. He has a chance to come out alive. And it is a good lesson going forward for "Black" people in general. 1. Know your neighbors. Crazy insane racist fruitcakes need to be identified. Stop worrying about offending people. This is a matter of life or death.2. Arm yourselves when you find that you live near crazy insane racist fruitcakes. They do not care about your life. They will kill you and your family, then excuse it just like you are doing here.3. Get training for using weapons, practice safety at home and when you leave your home. Yes crazy insane fruitcake racist. I am "Black" and I will go wherever I please on public property whenever I wish. And only the proper authorities have a right to detain me. And you can bet if someone infringes upon my constitutional right, to travel where I please, I will deal with them accordingly. I understand your point fruitcake racist. You think you own "Black" people. I would not put that theory to the test.
What do I do if someone is stalking me well first of all I ask why, secondly i talk reasonably to them, thirdly i call the police but what i dont do is savagely attack them as then I'm committing a crime by instigating violence and threatening somebody's life giving them the right to shoot me and if I'm armed and shoot them or grab their gun and shoot them well that's murder.Zimmerman as a concerned citizen & resident has the legal right to watch & go wherever he wants.1. Trayvon wasn't a resident, which was why Zimmerman called police and followed him after he saw Trayvon acting suspiciously.2. Certainly arm yourself as is your legal right provided you dont have a criminal record but learn the law.3. Gun training is a must in my opinion for any law bidding gun owner and it's a good way to meet other like minded citizens.4. Attend special classes that teach black men that its illegal to attack a person and that under the stand your ground law they can be shot and killed, if you attack a person or if armed shoot a person you will be jailed. Bottom line is that you are allowed to defend yourself but that does not give you the right to attack a person.5. To teach young black men like yourself the difference between private property and public property as well as about trespass laws.
1. Zimmerman had called the police yet he refused to do what the police ordered him to do. If Stand your ground is legal for Zimmerman, then it is legal for Trayvon. The law is supposed to be blind to race, culture and skin color.2. Hey, Trayvon needed a gun. I said that already. That way he doesn't have to whup Zimmerman's ass. He can just shoot him if he is threatened. I don't know why you are disputing that.3. Trayvon's parent was a resident. So he had every right to be there. And walking while being "Black" isn't acting suspiciously. Even so, Zimmerman has no right to Trayvon's privacy and the only way to ensure that is with a gun.4. Right Trayvon had no legal record and had every right to own a gun. And you are wrong. Even convicted felons can have their gun rights restored. So you need to learn the law.5. Right, Trayvon was a law abiding citizen. He just needed a gun with some bullets in it.6. No, we just need classes on being able to draw and fire accurately whenever an insane crazed racist thinks they can take our rights away because they are armed. Racists are cowards. When the odds are even, they run. 7. Crazy racist fruicake, neither incident involves the trespass of private property. Again, I will go where I wish on public land, and no crazy racist is going to stop me.
1. Police operators advise they dont order as they are not officers and have no legal authority.2. Trayvon needed a lesson in the law not a gun. He could only shoot if attacked.3. Trayvon father was not a resident, his girlfriend was. Zimmerman as a resident has the right to enquire the identity of anyone, they dont have to answer. Even if Trayvon is armed it still doesn't give him the right to shoot someone if the talk to him.4. While a student at Dr. Michael M. Krop High School, Martin had behavioral issues. At the time of the shooting, he was serving a ten-day suspension for having a marijuana pipe and an empty bag containing marijuana residue. He had been suspended twice before, for tardiness and truancy and marking up a door with graffiti. The suspension for graffiti was in October 2011, when Martin was observed by a school police officer on a security camera "hiding and being suspicious" in a restricted area of the school. According to the officer, he later observed Martin marking up a door with "W. T. F." ("what the fuck?"). When his backpack was searched the next day by a Miami-Dade School Police officer, looking for the graffiti marker, the officer found a dozen pieces of women's jewelry, a watch and a screwdriver that was described by the school police officer as a burglary tool. The jewelry found in his backpack included silver wedding bands and earrings with diamonds. Depends what state you live in and the seriousness of your crime ie violence forget it.
5. Trayvon could have owned a gun but by attacking Zimmerman hed end up in jail or dead.6. No one took Trayvon's rights away, he made a bad choice to launch a racist assault Zimmerman and paid with his life.7. Trayvon and audrey were previously trespassing and acting suspiciously which is why good citizens felt the need to speak to them. Go on to public land all you want bug when you step on to private property that's called trespassing and is illegal.
1. Advise/order it doesn't matter. He made the decision to stalk Trayvon. Trayvon just needed a gun to ensure he can walk without anyone bothering him.2. Trayvon needed gun lessons badly. As does every "Black" person who lives near a crazy insane racist like you and Zimmerman. They need gun training because you don't understand "Black" people have the same rights to privacy that you enjoy. I will walk where I please on public property and no crazy insane racist is going to stop me.3. Wrong. If Trayvon had a gun, he would be perfectly within his rights to shoot and kill Zimmerman is Zimmerman threatens his life. As you said, his father's girlfriend lived there. He had ever right to be there. 4. None what you post matters. Behaviorial issues do not justify murder. And Trayvon had a right to own a gun. He was not a convicted felon. And even then, he could file to have his gun rights reinstated. He just needed a weapon with the appropriate ammunition. Nothing you post prevents him from owning a weapon.
1. Zimmerman's legal right. Can legally be bothered with or without a gun.2. Learn gun laws first that way you won't get shot or jailed.3. Wrong nobody threatened Trayvon, you can't shoot someone for talking to you nor can you savagely attack them.4. doesn't matter if he had a right to own a gun. Trespassing is ilegal. Yes he had a criminal background. Nothing may have prevented him owning a gun but if he used it on Zimmerman nothing would stop him going to jail.You are having so much trouble understanding the law, I've a feeling you are going to get shot or jailed because of it lol.
1. Trayvon has the same rights.2. Already know them. I have a concealed weapons permit. If any fruitcake racist thinks he can intimidate me, he will find he is mistaken. I will go wherever I please in public. And no fruitcake racist is going to stop me.3. Well if Trayvon has a gun, we can be certain that Zimmerman would not have threatened him. Zimmerman would have worked off some of that fat sprinting away.4. He broke no laws. There was no trespassing. He was legally going back to the residence of his father's girlfriend. There has been no finding that he broke the law. 5. I understand the law. And I will explain it to any insane crazed racist fruitcake who needs to understand I can go in public wherever I please without anyone questioning my right to privacy. The funny thing is you are not even American. You are in Sweden or at least you claim to be. How is your Swedish wife? You guys been married for awhile now?
1. Yes he did bug made a bad choice2. You can walk on until attacked3. Only difference is that Trayvon would be jailed for life.4. He was lurking about the neighbourhood, Zimmerman had a right to question him Trayvon could have just walked on instead of assaulting him5. Dude your going to get shot. I'm not swedish. I'm American
1. Choose to carry a gun. What every "Black" family has to make a decision on now. You have to know if crazy insane racists are your neighbors. 2. Oh, you don't know the stand your ground law. He can stand his ground. He can turn and say, "I am standing my ground." But you aren't American, you don't know anything about the law.3. No, he wouldn't the stand your ground law is very specific. Trayvon has no obligation to retreat. Read the law crazy insane racist. It isn't in your first language. But it is written in English.4. Going to the store and coming back is not lurking. Either way, Zimmerman is no authority. And in order to ensure he understands that, Trayvon needed a gun.5. I am not going to get shot. I have the right to go in my society wherever I please. If I ever go to Sweden, I will have to obey whatever rules you have there. Though I am certain the rules there are much different than in America.Well, don't be mad that you are not a Slav. The requirements for being a Slav are quite high.
1. Any actual black will tell you it's not the white neighbor with a gun they need to worry about it's the black ones.2. He can only stand his ground if attacked. He can't attack.3. the law clearly says you can stand your ground if attacked not attack as so many foolish black men like yourself seem to do.4. Zimmerman doesn't need authority to ask an unknown thug if he lives there, which Trayvon didn't.5. Yes you are going to get shot or jailed because you think you can shot people for speaking to you. Sweden doesn't have stand your ground The requirements for being a slav is pretty low.
1. Oh Swedish guy who pretends to be Slav. Any "Black" and I am any "Black" will also tell you that if a "Black" person kills me, he/she will in all likelihood be arrested and tried for murder. Whereas, a "White" supremacist fruitcake racist would be off and free to live his life with his family if I am dead. Like the three men who killed Aubrey, went free for two months before they were arrested. Had they been "Black", they would have been arrested on the spot. If you note the "Black" man who defended his how dead girlfriend in a no knock warrant break in on his property was arrested immediately. And was only released after a public outcry. Man for a Swedish wannabe Slav, you sure are interested in American race relations. :D2. He can stand his ground against a perceived threat. AS YOU HAVE SAID REPEATEDLY, READ THE LAW. But you are not an American so, what do you know?3. The law clearly states you can stand your ground and with no obligation to retreat. It says nothing about an attack. If a person perceives they are in danger of great bodily harm, they can stand their ground. READ THE LEGISLATION. GO BACK TO YOUR GOOGLE SEARCHES. That's what happens when you are not an American citizen. You are ignorant of American law. They don't have stand your ground laws in Sweden do they?4. Zimmerman has no authority period. And Trayvon with a proper weapon can stand his ground. In a perfectly legal manner he can inform Zimmerman he will stand his ground if Zimmerman approaches him. Zimmerman was armed and he could make the decision about his life then. But we know he is a coward. He and you have something in common. You both are not Slavs.5. Nope, I am going to live a long happy life with my family. And no crazy insane fruitcake racist is going to tell me where I can or cannot go on public property. But you are thousands of miles away. . . little anonymous troll. You are the least of my worries.
1. No one agrees with no knock warrants except police.2. You can stand your ground only if attacked not if you are the attacking thug.3. Yes stand your ground and dont retreat but you can't be the aggressor or its jail.4. Stand your ground if you want but If you attack its jail or a guy like Zimmerman has the right to defend himself. Zimmerman is a hispanic dont be racist and quit being racist about slavs when you are clearly ignorant of them.5. No you are going to get shot because you dont understand the difference between standing your ground and attacking or the difference between private and public property.It's ok because you probably not even black and your girlfriend merely fantasy.
1. Not a response. I mentioned the other case to show how the American justice system works in too many instances. When it does not dispense justice people have no faith in it. As in when a fruitcake racist kills a "Black" person claiming their lives were in danger. Crazy racist logic always talks about who kills most "Black" people just like most "White" people are not killed by other "Whites". But this is the conclusions of a racist Swedish guy who lives thousands of miles away in another country. You aren't even accepted in your community, yet you pretend to critique American society.2. Again, read the law. Go back to google and search for Florida's stand your ground law. It says, upon threat of great bodily harm. 3. Again, read the law. Go back to google and search for Florida's stand your ground law. It says, upon threat of great bodily harm.4. Again, read the law. Go back to google and search for Florida's stand your ground law. It says, upon threat of great bodily harm.5. Again, read the law. Go back to google and search for Florida's stand your ground law. It says, upon threat of great bodily harm. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.
1. You attack a person they have right to defend themselves. Statistics and the prison pop6show that black men are too quick too attack.2. Threat of bodily harm is a thug attacking you and trying to take your gun.3. Again reread what threat of bodily harm means legally 4. Again reread what threat of bodily harm means legally 5. www.google.com/.../florida-man-michael-drejka-markeis-mcglockton-stand-your-ground-found-guilty-manslaughter here is a different case see if you can tell the difference as to why this wasn't legal and the Zimmerman case and Aubrey case was.
They only raised their voice to dismiss the case and talk about how thug Ahmaud Aubrey was shot attacking somebody
What is your actual point?
Until liberals stop saying that reverse racism doesn't exist and attacking people who say white lives matter than they need reminding of the fact that Black people are violent too.
@Jackblue saying white lives matter makes you a racist because you miss the point of black lives matter. Black people are just trying to get people to admit they matter, but that was too much for racist white rednecks. You can't even say black people matter, that's too much for you. Go back on your turnip truck with your sister/wife
I am not a redneck I have a master's degree in education and I bet I have traveled more than you have. I spent 14 months in China teaching English and living the lifestyle of a lower middle class Chinese person. Before that I went to India for four months and after seeing the poverty there I realized that most "poor" Americans need to quit bitching, they don't have it that bad. I will say here and now black lives do matter. Right now however, blacks and liberals don't seem to recognize white lives matter too and the threat of prison isn't enough to stop black criminals we need a cultural change.
@Jackblue you have a master's degree in a fake field. I bet you go to church and worship the fake God.
It is a Master's of Education: Curriculum and Instruction to be exact. Actually I used to believe in God, but am now an agnostic, so by making fun of God you are actually insulting the black people you claim to support most of whom believe in God, not me.
@Jackblue this is true the majority of us practicing Christians are black.
@Jackblue a Master's degree in BS (BULLSHIT).
My mass shooters? Its black kids that are shot down by other black kids, mass shootings though terrible dont compare to what happens in the inner cities every weekend
The double standard is if the roles were reversed it would have been labeled racist white mean beats old black man. LeBron James would get on his high horse along with every other bitch celebrity and liberal politician. Anyone who can't see this in 2020 is a hateful POS. Everyday you see a story about a white person doing something "bad" to a black person, literally EVERYDAY.
@angryyhedge If there was a good case for the attack being racially motivated they would be up in arms but that's not the case here. It's 2020, not 2016 and you can't just contrive hypocrisy to gain support for your anti-SJW campaign and expect people to fall for it hook line and sinker.
What you fail to see is if the roles were reversed it would automatically be a hate crime. Eveytime a white person does a bad thing to a black person they consider it racially motivated without any evidence. Just pay attention to the article headlines and you will see what I'm talking about.
@angryyhedge That's just conjecture on your part. Were there crimes committed by whites against blacks that were mislabeled as a hate crime? Yes but that isn't true for every white on black crime (contrary to your worldview where there is some regressive left/cultural marxist/SJW undercurrent controlling the media).
It's not true for every crime but you see the media doing it on a daily basis. They love stories of white on black crime so they can demonize white people. That's how they keep the racial tension high. Whether they do it on purpose or have an agenda really doesn't matter. Point being it's making us look bad and is creating hatred towards us.
@angryyhedge Do you have any data that shows more coverage of white on black than black on white crime relative to the occurrences of said crimes?
Hahaha evidence, we both know there's plenty just go on all the left wing sites.
@angryyhedge That's called cherrypicking ;)
here's the actual vid but still tells nothingmobile.twitter.com/.../1263531020009299969
And i was right. Dudes mentally illhttps://ibb.co/x7Fkr48
@DizzyDesii No surprise there
Then don't click on them
Even if I don’t they’re still on my feed😂 but oh well