Questions

I came across a photo on my Facebook page that just triggered me so much for some reason... it took me a while to figure out what it was, but then I realized it... the two girl's shorts stop at the very top of their thigh, while the boy's shorts go down to the knee. Besides just the photo itself, it's a really widespread phenomenon. Even when buying clothes for toddlers or children you will notice this, which is... rather creepy. Why would you want little girls showing off their thighs? At least keep the shorts length thing exclusive to adults and not forced onto children. I know that both men's shorts and women's shorts used to be super short in the 80's and before that, but in the 90's and forward they get longer and have stayed longer, showing that there is truly no good reason for the length. There's the fact that men's shorts are designed with practicality and function and comfort in mind, while women's shorts are designed just to simply look good for men, but is there any GOOD reason for women's shorts being so much shorter than men's shorts?

Only Kings who lived during the time of photography, I didn't include HM Queen Elizabeth II for 2 reasons

1. Comparing females with males in terms of attractiveness is odd

2. Out of respect, she died recently

I didn't include the future George VII (Prince George), either, since asking how attractive a child is seems weird to me

Men's shorts that go above the knee... something that's so controversial for not very good reason. Some people say it looks "gay," others just think it looks bad, etc.

However, I just don't see the problem. To me it looks perfectly fine, and I actually PREFER men wear their shorts this way.

And to be perfectly honest, I find it kind of hot. Like take the example picture, I kind of looked at it way too long, hehehehe. 😂 I just find all that exposed mid to lower thigh kind of hot. 70's or 80's shorts are way too short in my opinion, but the example picture to me is the perfect length. 🤤