Search Results: girl measurements

I have a problem. I want to be noticeably taller, bigger and more muscular than my ideal girlfriend, and by extension, I want my ideal girlfriend to be considerably shorter, smaller and slimmer than me. A lot taller than her, enough to rub the underside of my chin against the top of her head when I hold her close to me, and broader than her, as well as a lot heavier and stronger than her, to the extent where I can princess-carry her around or carry her over my shoulder. Those are the things I dream about, the imagined images which turn me on the most of all. I NEED to feel powerful, dominant- if I can't, then I can't be aroused. Trouble is, I'm only 5'7" tall. With the circumferences of my shoulders, chest, waist, hips and thighs measuring in at only 41", 35", 29.5", 31.5" and 19.5" respectively (shoulder width= 17.5") And while I can comfortably lift, walk around with and climb flights of stairs carrying weights considerably heavier than myself, and I have chiselled, well-defined abs, pecs and muscles everywhere, I still only weigh in at a meagre 120lbs (54kg).

Which means that, to meet my ideal criteria, to stand any chance of doing these things with her and to be taller, bigger and muscular enough in comparison to her for me to be aroused by the mental imagery of having sex with her, in the real world, she'd have to be 4'11" or shorter, and under 95lbs (43kg), with a waist slimmer than my own (27" or less). Her bust, hips and thighs don't matter all that much to me, but even so, do I have any chance of ever finding any girl (over the age of 16) who's small and slim enough to fit within these size parameters, here in the UK, where landwhales seem to be the norm these days? Or any chance of her being the slightest bit attracted to me, given how short, lightweight and slender I am? Or should I give up; are my desired measurements for my ideal girl too strict and unreasonable?