Search Results: gay marriage

"I believe that Jesus would approve of gay marriage, but that’s just my own personal belief," he later added. "I think Jesus would encourage any love affair if it was honest and sincere and was not damaging to anyone else"

Read here
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/9/jimmy-carter-i-believe-that-jesus-would-approve-of/

Do u support gay marriage, gay love, and gay everything?

In some ways we have come a long way, The gay community has been recognized more and has received more openness and love and respect than in the past and marriage equality is recognized in most places now. And the womens movement has made a lot of progress in certain areas. However I do feel like there's more negativity in the world then a decade ago. I'm not sure if it's based on political circumstances and it's caused those types of people to become open with their hatefulness or what. Overall I think everything will eventually balance itself out. I'm a very loving person and I like to believe most people are good and full of love inside.

Just skip to the conclusion if you trust me
Assume you love first before you get married.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus (if following the laws, the statements are 100% true)
Correct me if I'm wrong.

Using Modus Tollens

If p then q; not q; therefore not p
p=love
q=sign marriage certificate = officially married (true statement)

If love then sign marriage certificate
Not sign marriage certificate
Therefore Not love

if you don't sign your marriage contract, you're not in love
or you need to sign the marriage certificate, then you're in love,
and before you sign your love isn't real.
This is all true and proven below

You scratching your head? keep reading.


The above statement is true if love = exist. If it doesn't, we can make it exist using negation of not p)

So we have assumed 2 scenarios where there is love, and there isn't.
q =true, so we have to make p= true for the 2 scenarios
p=love
If you believe love is real is true, then don't marry (no benefit) - q=love is true. So 100% true

Using p is equivalent to the negation of not p
p=love is true. Is eqv to p=" love isn't true" is true

If you believe "love isn't true" then marry.
(for gains, or you think it might work out, divorce helps your scam live longer)

conclusion;

If you believe you need to love before you marry
Whether love is real or not real,
Marriage only benefits those who marry without love for each other (or one-sided)
If you're in both in love, don't marry, there are no REAL benefits. Only costing money.

Therefore Abolish Marriage law because it's useless (+ fixes gay marriage, no divorces)

In the argument over gay marriage a lot of people opposed it by claiming that marriage has been traditionally between a man and a woman. Traditionally marriage involved a lot of things such as love, romance, passion, sex etc... However, those aren't things you can really legislate because in a free society you don't dictate people's personal lives. Instead of looking at what marriage has been traditionally we should instead look at what it is legally. And legally speaking it is simply a financial contract between two individuals stating that they will jointly share their property and income. And guess what, people do get married for purely financial reasons all the time and sometimes both parties have relationships with people outside their marriage and both partners are aware and OK with it because the marriage had nothing to do with romance in the first place. Traditionalists may think that's wrong but like I said, this is a free society. So, from that perspective, it doesn't make any more sense to call a same sex marriage "homosexual" or a different sex marriage "heterosexual" any more than it would make calling any kind of financial contract homo or heterosexual because of the genders of the co-signers of said contract. And as such, if you're going to deny two individuals the right to enter into a financial contract with one another because of what genders they are; whether it'd be because both are male or both female OR because they are of the same or different genders, (no matter how you feel about homosexuality) you're violating their civil rights, that's all there is to.

Basically it's divorcing the same sex marriage debate from homosexuality.