Search Results: men in jail

Strangers (normally females) have a tendency to belittle the male's in public and when the man says be civil to me please im nit a kid.. they often end up in jail. For not having a female friend or with constant up for him.

I can always take a female friend or family member with me in public to defend me against another Bossy arrogant stranger female.


But doing that would sometimes be hard as they too have their own lives to attend to.


Our female feelings are not our baby sisters to watch us like big sisters or bodyguards.. they have their own lives
If it's a guy I can punch him in the face.. but if it's a woman I got to watch my mouth actions so she don't throw in cuffs

I was at the clinic with my friend and only serves the following incident. when I saw the man. In cuffs We left the facility immediately thinking that we should get out of here.

So a man enters the local clinic seeking medical help.
The nurse at the facility is a real mean witch. She speaks to him as one would speak to a 10 year old kid.
He tells her please we are both adults let's be civil to each other (calm tone)
She flares up " I'm not blah blah etc.
He tells her again "I'm not a ten year old kid. talk civil to me.
She calls security and have the man thrown in jail.

I see some people (mostly feminists tbh) go on about how men have so many more privileges than they do.

But honestly, I've never seen us as really having that. For example, we're more likely to fail school, commit suicide and get longer jail sentences for equivalent crimes just to name a few.

Not to sit on the pity potty but I don't see men as having many societal advantages, only really physical ones.

But what do you think?

"Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]" April 16th 1963
I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality.

I don't know if maybe I'm just tired or annoyed or angry but it seems to me that white people who only want "blissful" ignorance or who say "Let's not talk about race at all and all the problems related to race will go away" are 10 times more frustrating than all the racists I've met combined.