Search Results: hand thigh

So what I mean by the title, is either my girlfriend shows a lot of leg, or none at all.

For example, either she wears tiny shorts with very small or no legs to them, and they basically leave her legs completely bare... no, she never shows butt cheek, but it's still a hell lot of leg. The longest shorts she's worn were mid-thigh length. Either that, or she wears full long pants, showing no leg once so ever. She never wears knee length shorts, or capris. She doesn't even own anything in an in between length.

It's the same with her skirts and dresses. Either they're full length maxis in which sweep the floor a bit, or they're a hand above the knee to mid-thigh length. Basically, they're either long, or pretty short, in which I consider above the knee "short" in terms of skirts/dresses.

When I told her I loved her style but asked why she did it, she just simply said she likes things that are either one or the other, and have overall made a decision. She said she doesn't like something that is the mid-way length, and hasn't decided whether to be above the knee or full length.

She also said that when she shaves her legs she wants to have them show WELL, not just a little piece. She always shaves her legs from ankle to butt cheeks, so there's no reason for her to cover any of it up when she shaves. So if the shorts/skirts/dresses are not above her knee, she doesn't buy them. She wears pants and maxis to cover up when the hair starts to grow back.

So that's her overall reason for dressing in such a manner.

Her tops are also kind of similar. Either she wears full long sleeves, or completely sleeveless. But the legs are much more noticeable.

Don't get me wrong, I DON'T have a problem with it. I absolutely love her style. But I'm just simply wondering how normal it is. Most people I know seem to wear something an in-between length at least sometimes, but she... never. So is it considered weird?